The extent of interorganizational resource sharing among local health departments

The association with organizational characteristics and institutional factors

Joshua Vest, Gulzar H. Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context/Objective: Resource sharing, arrangements between local health departments (LHDs) for joint programs or to share staff, is a growing occurrence. The post-9/11 influx of federal funding and new public health preparedness responsibilities dramatically increased the occurrence of these inter-LHD relationships, and several states have pursed more intrastate collaboration. This article describes the current state of resource sharing among LHDs and identifies the factors associated with resource sharing. Design and Setting: Using the National Association of County & City Health Officials 2010 Profile Survey, we determined the self-reported number of shared programmatic activities and the number of shared organizational functions for a sample of LHDs. Negative binomial regression models described the relationships between factors suggested by interorganizational theory and the counts of sharing activities. Main Outcome Measures:: We examined the extent of resource sharing using 2 different count variables: (1) number of shared programmatic activities and (2) number of shared organizational functions. Results : About one-half of all LHDs are engaged in resource sharing. The extent of sharing was lower for those serving larger populations, with city jurisdictions, or of larger size. Sharing was more extensive for state-governed LHDs, those covering multiple jurisdictions, states with centralized governance, and in instances of financial constraint. Conclusions : Many LHDs are engaged in a greater extent of resource sharing than others. Leaders of LHDs can work within the Context of these factors to leverage resource sharing to meet their organizational needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-560
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume18
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health
Statistical Models
Public Health
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

Keywords

  • organization and administration
  • organizational innovation
  • workforce

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{00716449bfa54d5fa355e11d492f8346,
title = "The extent of interorganizational resource sharing among local health departments: The association with organizational characteristics and institutional factors",
abstract = "Context/Objective: Resource sharing, arrangements between local health departments (LHDs) for joint programs or to share staff, is a growing occurrence. The post-9/11 influx of federal funding and new public health preparedness responsibilities dramatically increased the occurrence of these inter-LHD relationships, and several states have pursed more intrastate collaboration. This article describes the current state of resource sharing among LHDs and identifies the factors associated with resource sharing. Design and Setting: Using the National Association of County & City Health Officials 2010 Profile Survey, we determined the self-reported number of shared programmatic activities and the number of shared organizational functions for a sample of LHDs. Negative binomial regression models described the relationships between factors suggested by interorganizational theory and the counts of sharing activities. Main Outcome Measures:: We examined the extent of resource sharing using 2 different count variables: (1) number of shared programmatic activities and (2) number of shared organizational functions. Results : About one-half of all LHDs are engaged in resource sharing. The extent of sharing was lower for those serving larger populations, with city jurisdictions, or of larger size. Sharing was more extensive for state-governed LHDs, those covering multiple jurisdictions, states with centralized governance, and in instances of financial constraint. Conclusions : Many LHDs are engaged in a greater extent of resource sharing than others. Leaders of LHDs can work within the Context of these factors to leverage resource sharing to meet their organizational needs.",
keywords = "organization and administration, organizational innovation, workforce",
author = "Joshua Vest and Shah, {Gulzar H.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825b89e4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "551--560",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The extent of interorganizational resource sharing among local health departments

T2 - The association with organizational characteristics and institutional factors

AU - Vest, Joshua

AU - Shah, Gulzar H.

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Context/Objective: Resource sharing, arrangements between local health departments (LHDs) for joint programs or to share staff, is a growing occurrence. The post-9/11 influx of federal funding and new public health preparedness responsibilities dramatically increased the occurrence of these inter-LHD relationships, and several states have pursed more intrastate collaboration. This article describes the current state of resource sharing among LHDs and identifies the factors associated with resource sharing. Design and Setting: Using the National Association of County & City Health Officials 2010 Profile Survey, we determined the self-reported number of shared programmatic activities and the number of shared organizational functions for a sample of LHDs. Negative binomial regression models described the relationships between factors suggested by interorganizational theory and the counts of sharing activities. Main Outcome Measures:: We examined the extent of resource sharing using 2 different count variables: (1) number of shared programmatic activities and (2) number of shared organizational functions. Results : About one-half of all LHDs are engaged in resource sharing. The extent of sharing was lower for those serving larger populations, with city jurisdictions, or of larger size. Sharing was more extensive for state-governed LHDs, those covering multiple jurisdictions, states with centralized governance, and in instances of financial constraint. Conclusions : Many LHDs are engaged in a greater extent of resource sharing than others. Leaders of LHDs can work within the Context of these factors to leverage resource sharing to meet their organizational needs.

AB - Context/Objective: Resource sharing, arrangements between local health departments (LHDs) for joint programs or to share staff, is a growing occurrence. The post-9/11 influx of federal funding and new public health preparedness responsibilities dramatically increased the occurrence of these inter-LHD relationships, and several states have pursed more intrastate collaboration. This article describes the current state of resource sharing among LHDs and identifies the factors associated with resource sharing. Design and Setting: Using the National Association of County & City Health Officials 2010 Profile Survey, we determined the self-reported number of shared programmatic activities and the number of shared organizational functions for a sample of LHDs. Negative binomial regression models described the relationships between factors suggested by interorganizational theory and the counts of sharing activities. Main Outcome Measures:: We examined the extent of resource sharing using 2 different count variables: (1) number of shared programmatic activities and (2) number of shared organizational functions. Results : About one-half of all LHDs are engaged in resource sharing. The extent of sharing was lower for those serving larger populations, with city jurisdictions, or of larger size. Sharing was more extensive for state-governed LHDs, those covering multiple jurisdictions, states with centralized governance, and in instances of financial constraint. Conclusions : Many LHDs are engaged in a greater extent of resource sharing than others. Leaders of LHDs can work within the Context of these factors to leverage resource sharing to meet their organizational needs.

KW - organization and administration

KW - organizational innovation

KW - workforce

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867529024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867529024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825b89e4

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825b89e4

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 551

EP - 560

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 6

ER -