The impact of uncertainty on decision making in prenatal consultations: Obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines decision making in prenatal consultations, how obstetricians (OBs) and midwives differ, and the role of uncertainty in these processes. Using participant-observation, comparative case-study methodology, pregnant women were observed and audio-recorded in their pre- and postnatal appointments, and in-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with mothers and providers. Although decision-making processes appear similar between the OBs and midwives, closer analysis, employing problematic integration theory, reveals marked differences in providers' probabilistic and evaluative orientations that carry clear implications for both mothers and providers during pregnancy care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)199-211
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Communication
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

midwife
Midwifery
Uncertainty
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Decision making
Mothers
uncertainty
decision making
participant observation
decision-making process
pregnancy
Pregnant Women
Appointments and Schedules
Observation
Interviews
Pregnancy
methodology
interview

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Communication

Cite this

The impact of uncertainty on decision making in prenatal consultations : Obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives. / Matthias, Marianne.

In: Health Communication, Vol. 25, No. 3, 01.04.2010, p. 199-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3ee9a5fe0a22485a9765dbad0044df9b,
title = "The impact of uncertainty on decision making in prenatal consultations: Obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives",
abstract = "This article examines decision making in prenatal consultations, how obstetricians (OBs) and midwives differ, and the role of uncertainty in these processes. Using participant-observation, comparative case-study methodology, pregnant women were observed and audio-recorded in their pre- and postnatal appointments, and in-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with mothers and providers. Although decision-making processes appear similar between the OBs and midwives, closer analysis, employing problematic integration theory, reveals marked differences in providers' probabilistic and evaluative orientations that carry clear implications for both mothers and providers during pregnancy care.",
author = "Marianne Matthias",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10410230903544977",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "199--211",
journal = "Health Communication",
issn = "1041-0236",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of uncertainty on decision making in prenatal consultations

T2 - Obstetricians' and midwives' perspectives

AU - Matthias, Marianne

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - This article examines decision making in prenatal consultations, how obstetricians (OBs) and midwives differ, and the role of uncertainty in these processes. Using participant-observation, comparative case-study methodology, pregnant women were observed and audio-recorded in their pre- and postnatal appointments, and in-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with mothers and providers. Although decision-making processes appear similar between the OBs and midwives, closer analysis, employing problematic integration theory, reveals marked differences in providers' probabilistic and evaluative orientations that carry clear implications for both mothers and providers during pregnancy care.

AB - This article examines decision making in prenatal consultations, how obstetricians (OBs) and midwives differ, and the role of uncertainty in these processes. Using participant-observation, comparative case-study methodology, pregnant women were observed and audio-recorded in their pre- and postnatal appointments, and in-depth, semistructured interviews were conducted with mothers and providers. Although decision-making processes appear similar between the OBs and midwives, closer analysis, employing problematic integration theory, reveals marked differences in providers' probabilistic and evaluative orientations that carry clear implications for both mothers and providers during pregnancy care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952325127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952325127&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10410230903544977

DO - 10.1080/10410230903544977

M3 - Article

C2 - 20461605

AN - SCOPUS:77952325127

VL - 25

SP - 199

EP - 211

JO - Health Communication

JF - Health Communication

SN - 1041-0236

IS - 3

ER -