The Indiana University Telephone-Based Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: A new method for large scale neuropsychological assessment

Frederick Unverzagt, Patrick Monahan, Lyndsi R. Moser, Qianqian Zhao, Janet Carpenter, George W. Sledfe, Victoria Champion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sensitive measures of neuropsychological function were adapted to a telephone administration format for use in a large survey of quality of life in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Healthy controls (HC) and BCS were recruited from the community and administered the same neuropsychological test battery on two occasions separated by 1 week. Subjects were randomly assigned to conditions, stratified by diagnosis: In-person at Time-1 and In-person at Time-2 (P-P); Telephone at Time-1 and Telephone at Time-2 (T-T); T-P; and P-T. Four cognitive (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Digit Span, Symbol Digit) and two self-report measures (Squire Memory Self-Report Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) were used. The 106 subjects were randomized (54 HC and 52 BCS). Test-retest reliabilities (intraclass correlations) did not differ significantly by condition across the cognitive or self-report measures and ranged from moderate to near perfect (r's .43-.93; p's < .05). Mean scores at Time-1, practice effects (Time-1 to Time-2), and standard errors of measurement were comparable between In-person and Telephone administration formats. Results suggest that memory, attention, information processing speed, verbal fluency, and self-report of mood and memory can be measured reliably and precisely over the telephone.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)799-806
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Volume13
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Telephone
Self Report
Survivors
Breast Neoplasms
Verbal Learning
Neuropsychological Tests
Automatic Data Processing
Reproducibility of Results
Epidemiologic Studies
Quality of Life
Depression

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Dementia
  • Diagnosis
  • Mass screening
  • Memory
  • Mild cognitive Impairment
  • Neuropsychological test

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neurology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

@article{c65a6716b6e64495bf4f12be1854a259,
title = "The Indiana University Telephone-Based Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: A new method for large scale neuropsychological assessment",
abstract = "Sensitive measures of neuropsychological function were adapted to a telephone administration format for use in a large survey of quality of life in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Healthy controls (HC) and BCS were recruited from the community and administered the same neuropsychological test battery on two occasions separated by 1 week. Subjects were randomly assigned to conditions, stratified by diagnosis: In-person at Time-1 and In-person at Time-2 (P-P); Telephone at Time-1 and Telephone at Time-2 (T-T); T-P; and P-T. Four cognitive (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Digit Span, Symbol Digit) and two self-report measures (Squire Memory Self-Report Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) were used. The 106 subjects were randomized (54 HC and 52 BCS). Test-retest reliabilities (intraclass correlations) did not differ significantly by condition across the cognitive or self-report measures and ranged from moderate to near perfect (r's .43-.93; p's < .05). Mean scores at Time-1, practice effects (Time-1 to Time-2), and standard errors of measurement were comparable between In-person and Telephone administration formats. Results suggest that memory, attention, information processing speed, verbal fluency, and self-report of mood and memory can be measured reliably and precisely over the telephone.",
keywords = "Cognition, Dementia, Diagnosis, Mass screening, Memory, Mild cognitive Impairment, Neuropsychological test",
author = "Frederick Unverzagt and Patrick Monahan and Moser, {Lyndsi R.} and Qianqian Zhao and Janet Carpenter and Sledfe, {George W.} and Victoria Champion",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1017/S1355617707071020",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "799--806",
journal = "Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society",
issn = "1355-6177",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Indiana University Telephone-Based Assessment of Neuropsychological Status

T2 - A new method for large scale neuropsychological assessment

AU - Unverzagt, Frederick

AU - Monahan, Patrick

AU - Moser, Lyndsi R.

AU - Zhao, Qianqian

AU - Carpenter, Janet

AU - Sledfe, George W.

AU - Champion, Victoria

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Sensitive measures of neuropsychological function were adapted to a telephone administration format for use in a large survey of quality of life in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Healthy controls (HC) and BCS were recruited from the community and administered the same neuropsychological test battery on two occasions separated by 1 week. Subjects were randomly assigned to conditions, stratified by diagnosis: In-person at Time-1 and In-person at Time-2 (P-P); Telephone at Time-1 and Telephone at Time-2 (T-T); T-P; and P-T. Four cognitive (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Digit Span, Symbol Digit) and two self-report measures (Squire Memory Self-Report Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) were used. The 106 subjects were randomized (54 HC and 52 BCS). Test-retest reliabilities (intraclass correlations) did not differ significantly by condition across the cognitive or self-report measures and ranged from moderate to near perfect (r's .43-.93; p's < .05). Mean scores at Time-1, practice effects (Time-1 to Time-2), and standard errors of measurement were comparable between In-person and Telephone administration formats. Results suggest that memory, attention, information processing speed, verbal fluency, and self-report of mood and memory can be measured reliably and precisely over the telephone.

AB - Sensitive measures of neuropsychological function were adapted to a telephone administration format for use in a large survey of quality of life in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Healthy controls (HC) and BCS were recruited from the community and administered the same neuropsychological test battery on two occasions separated by 1 week. Subjects were randomly assigned to conditions, stratified by diagnosis: In-person at Time-1 and In-person at Time-2 (P-P); Telephone at Time-1 and Telephone at Time-2 (T-T); T-P; and P-T. Four cognitive (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Digit Span, Symbol Digit) and two self-report measures (Squire Memory Self-Report Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) were used. The 106 subjects were randomized (54 HC and 52 BCS). Test-retest reliabilities (intraclass correlations) did not differ significantly by condition across the cognitive or self-report measures and ranged from moderate to near perfect (r's .43-.93; p's < .05). Mean scores at Time-1, practice effects (Time-1 to Time-2), and standard errors of measurement were comparable between In-person and Telephone administration formats. Results suggest that memory, attention, information processing speed, verbal fluency, and self-report of mood and memory can be measured reliably and precisely over the telephone.

KW - Cognition

KW - Dementia

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Mass screening

KW - Memory

KW - Mild cognitive Impairment

KW - Neuropsychological test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548134419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34548134419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1355617707071020

DO - 10.1017/S1355617707071020

M3 - Article

C2 - 17697411

AN - SCOPUS:34548134419

VL - 13

SP - 799

EP - 806

JO - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

JF - Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

SN - 1355-6177

IS - 5

ER -