The influence of patient sex, provider sex, and sexist attitudes on pain treatment decisions

Adam T. Hirsh, Nicole A. Hollingshead, Marianne S. Matthias, Matthew J. Bair, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research suggests that patient sex, provider sex, and providers' sexist attitudes interact to influence pain care; however, few empirical studies have examined these influences. We investigated sex (patient and provider) differences in pain treatment and the extent to which providers' sexist attitudes were associated with these differences. Ninety-eight health care providers (52% female) completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and made treatment ratings for 16 computer-simulated patients with low back pain. Patient sex was balanced across vignettes. Results indicated that female patients received significantly higher antidepressant (F[1, 96] = 4.51, P <.05, ηp2 =.05) and mental health referral (F[1, 96] = 3.89, P =.05, ηp2 =.04) ratings than male patients, which is consistent with our hypotheses; however, these differences were significant only among female providers. Controlling for providers' sexism scores did not substantially alter these results, which is counter to our hypotheses. These results suggest that female providers are more likely to recommend psychosocial treatments for female than for male pain patients, and providers' sexist attitudes do not account for these differences. Research is needed to elucidate the contributors to sex/gender differences in treatment in order to reduce pain disparities. Perspective The results of this study suggest that patient and provider sex, but not providers' sexist attitudes, influence pain care. These findings may inform efforts to raise awareness of sex/gender differences in pain care and reduce disparities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)551-559
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2014

Fingerprint

Pain
Sexism
Therapeutics
Sex Characteristics
Low Back Pain
Research
Health Personnel
Antidepressive Agents
Mental Health
Referral and Consultation
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • decision making
  • Pain treatment
  • sex differences
  • sexist attitudes
  • virtual technology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

The influence of patient sex, provider sex, and sexist attitudes on pain treatment decisions. / Hirsh, Adam T.; Hollingshead, Nicole A.; Matthias, Marianne S.; Bair, Matthew J.; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: Journal of Pain, Vol. 15, No. 5, 05.2014, p. 551-559.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dec18ddbf78f49aca428cfc5c9a1cae9,
title = "The influence of patient sex, provider sex, and sexist attitudes on pain treatment decisions",
abstract = "Research suggests that patient sex, provider sex, and providers' sexist attitudes interact to influence pain care; however, few empirical studies have examined these influences. We investigated sex (patient and provider) differences in pain treatment and the extent to which providers' sexist attitudes were associated with these differences. Ninety-eight health care providers (52{\%} female) completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and made treatment ratings for 16 computer-simulated patients with low back pain. Patient sex was balanced across vignettes. Results indicated that female patients received significantly higher antidepressant (F[1, 96] = 4.51, P <.05, ηp2 =.05) and mental health referral (F[1, 96] = 3.89, P =.05, ηp2 =.04) ratings than male patients, which is consistent with our hypotheses; however, these differences were significant only among female providers. Controlling for providers' sexism scores did not substantially alter these results, which is counter to our hypotheses. These results suggest that female providers are more likely to recommend psychosocial treatments for female than for male pain patients, and providers' sexist attitudes do not account for these differences. Research is needed to elucidate the contributors to sex/gender differences in treatment in order to reduce pain disparities. Perspective The results of this study suggest that patient and provider sex, but not providers' sexist attitudes, influence pain care. These findings may inform efforts to raise awareness of sex/gender differences in pain care and reduce disparities.",
keywords = "decision making, Pain treatment, sex differences, sexist attitudes, virtual technology",
author = "Hirsh, {Adam T.} and Hollingshead, {Nicole A.} and Matthias, {Marianne S.} and Bair, {Matthew J.} and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "2014",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "551--559",
journal = "Journal of Pain",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The influence of patient sex, provider sex, and sexist attitudes on pain treatment decisions

AU - Hirsh, Adam T.

AU - Hollingshead, Nicole A.

AU - Matthias, Marianne S.

AU - Bair, Matthew J.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 2014/5

Y1 - 2014/5

N2 - Research suggests that patient sex, provider sex, and providers' sexist attitudes interact to influence pain care; however, few empirical studies have examined these influences. We investigated sex (patient and provider) differences in pain treatment and the extent to which providers' sexist attitudes were associated with these differences. Ninety-eight health care providers (52% female) completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and made treatment ratings for 16 computer-simulated patients with low back pain. Patient sex was balanced across vignettes. Results indicated that female patients received significantly higher antidepressant (F[1, 96] = 4.51, P <.05, ηp2 =.05) and mental health referral (F[1, 96] = 3.89, P =.05, ηp2 =.04) ratings than male patients, which is consistent with our hypotheses; however, these differences were significant only among female providers. Controlling for providers' sexism scores did not substantially alter these results, which is counter to our hypotheses. These results suggest that female providers are more likely to recommend psychosocial treatments for female than for male pain patients, and providers' sexist attitudes do not account for these differences. Research is needed to elucidate the contributors to sex/gender differences in treatment in order to reduce pain disparities. Perspective The results of this study suggest that patient and provider sex, but not providers' sexist attitudes, influence pain care. These findings may inform efforts to raise awareness of sex/gender differences in pain care and reduce disparities.

AB - Research suggests that patient sex, provider sex, and providers' sexist attitudes interact to influence pain care; however, few empirical studies have examined these influences. We investigated sex (patient and provider) differences in pain treatment and the extent to which providers' sexist attitudes were associated with these differences. Ninety-eight health care providers (52% female) completed the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory and made treatment ratings for 16 computer-simulated patients with low back pain. Patient sex was balanced across vignettes. Results indicated that female patients received significantly higher antidepressant (F[1, 96] = 4.51, P <.05, ηp2 =.05) and mental health referral (F[1, 96] = 3.89, P =.05, ηp2 =.04) ratings than male patients, which is consistent with our hypotheses; however, these differences were significant only among female providers. Controlling for providers' sexism scores did not substantially alter these results, which is counter to our hypotheses. These results suggest that female providers are more likely to recommend psychosocial treatments for female than for male pain patients, and providers' sexist attitudes do not account for these differences. Research is needed to elucidate the contributors to sex/gender differences in treatment in order to reduce pain disparities. Perspective The results of this study suggest that patient and provider sex, but not providers' sexist attitudes, influence pain care. These findings may inform efforts to raise awareness of sex/gender differences in pain care and reduce disparities.

KW - decision making

KW - Pain treatment

KW - sex differences

KW - sexist attitudes

KW - virtual technology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899658912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899658912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.02.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 24576430

AN - SCOPUS:84899658912

VL - 15

SP - 551

EP - 559

JO - Journal of Pain

JF - Journal of Pain

SN - 1526-5900

IS - 5

ER -