The interaction of patient race, provider bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain management decisions

Adam T. Hirsh, Nicole A. Hollingshead, Leslie Ashburn-Nardo, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although racial disparities in pain care are widely reported, much remains to be known about the role of provider and contextual factors. We used computer-simulated patients to examine the influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain decisions. One hundred twenty-nine medical residents/fellows made assessment (pain intensity) and treatment (opioid and nonopioid analgesics) decisions for 12 virtual patients with acute pain. Race (black/white) and clinical ambiguity (high/low) were manipulated across vignettes. Participants completed the Implicit Association Test and feeling thermometers, which assess implicit and explicit racial biases, respectively. Individual- and group-level analyses indicated that race and ambiguity had an interactive effect on providers' decisions, such that decisions varied as a function of ambiguity for white but not for black patients. Individual differences across providers were observed for the effect of race and ambiguity on decisions; however, providers' implicit and explicit biases did not account for this variability. These data highlight the complexity of racial disparities and suggest that differences in care between white and black patients are, in part, attributable to the nature (ie, ambiguity) of the clinical scenario. The current study suggests that interventions to reduce disparities should differentially target patient, provider, and contextual factors. Perspective This study examined the unique and collective influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on providers' pain management decisions. These results could inform the development of interventions aimed at reducing disparities and improving pain care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)558-568
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Pain
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2015

Fingerprint

Pain Management
Racism
Pain
Non-Narcotic Analgesics
Thermometers
Acute Pain
Pain Measurement
Individuality
Opioid Analgesics
Emotions
hydroquinone

Keywords

  • bias
  • decision making
  • disparities
  • Race

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

The interaction of patient race, provider bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain management decisions. / Hirsh, Adam T.; Hollingshead, Nicole A.; Ashburn-Nardo, Leslie; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: Journal of Pain, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.06.2015, p. 558-568.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hirsh, Adam T. ; Hollingshead, Nicole A. ; Ashburn-Nardo, Leslie ; Kroenke, Kurt. / The interaction of patient race, provider bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain management decisions. In: Journal of Pain. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 6. pp. 558-568.
@article{34e4ce435ddf47d889947e4947354f56,
title = "The interaction of patient race, provider bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain management decisions",
abstract = "Although racial disparities in pain care are widely reported, much remains to be known about the role of provider and contextual factors. We used computer-simulated patients to examine the influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain decisions. One hundred twenty-nine medical residents/fellows made assessment (pain intensity) and treatment (opioid and nonopioid analgesics) decisions for 12 virtual patients with acute pain. Race (black/white) and clinical ambiguity (high/low) were manipulated across vignettes. Participants completed the Implicit Association Test and feeling thermometers, which assess implicit and explicit racial biases, respectively. Individual- and group-level analyses indicated that race and ambiguity had an interactive effect on providers' decisions, such that decisions varied as a function of ambiguity for white but not for black patients. Individual differences across providers were observed for the effect of race and ambiguity on decisions; however, providers' implicit and explicit biases did not account for this variability. These data highlight the complexity of racial disparities and suggest that differences in care between white and black patients are, in part, attributable to the nature (ie, ambiguity) of the clinical scenario. The current study suggests that interventions to reduce disparities should differentially target patient, provider, and contextual factors. Perspective This study examined the unique and collective influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on providers' pain management decisions. These results could inform the development of interventions aimed at reducing disparities and improving pain care.",
keywords = "bias, decision making, disparities, Race",
author = "Hirsh, {Adam T.} and Hollingshead, {Nicole A.} and Leslie Ashburn-Nardo and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "2015",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "558--568",
journal = "Journal of Pain",
issn = "1526-5900",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The interaction of patient race, provider bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain management decisions

AU - Hirsh, Adam T.

AU - Hollingshead, Nicole A.

AU - Ashburn-Nardo, Leslie

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 2015/6/1

Y1 - 2015/6/1

N2 - Although racial disparities in pain care are widely reported, much remains to be known about the role of provider and contextual factors. We used computer-simulated patients to examine the influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain decisions. One hundred twenty-nine medical residents/fellows made assessment (pain intensity) and treatment (opioid and nonopioid analgesics) decisions for 12 virtual patients with acute pain. Race (black/white) and clinical ambiguity (high/low) were manipulated across vignettes. Participants completed the Implicit Association Test and feeling thermometers, which assess implicit and explicit racial biases, respectively. Individual- and group-level analyses indicated that race and ambiguity had an interactive effect on providers' decisions, such that decisions varied as a function of ambiguity for white but not for black patients. Individual differences across providers were observed for the effect of race and ambiguity on decisions; however, providers' implicit and explicit biases did not account for this variability. These data highlight the complexity of racial disparities and suggest that differences in care between white and black patients are, in part, attributable to the nature (ie, ambiguity) of the clinical scenario. The current study suggests that interventions to reduce disparities should differentially target patient, provider, and contextual factors. Perspective This study examined the unique and collective influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on providers' pain management decisions. These results could inform the development of interventions aimed at reducing disparities and improving pain care.

AB - Although racial disparities in pain care are widely reported, much remains to be known about the role of provider and contextual factors. We used computer-simulated patients to examine the influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on pain decisions. One hundred twenty-nine medical residents/fellows made assessment (pain intensity) and treatment (opioid and nonopioid analgesics) decisions for 12 virtual patients with acute pain. Race (black/white) and clinical ambiguity (high/low) were manipulated across vignettes. Participants completed the Implicit Association Test and feeling thermometers, which assess implicit and explicit racial biases, respectively. Individual- and group-level analyses indicated that race and ambiguity had an interactive effect on providers' decisions, such that decisions varied as a function of ambiguity for white but not for black patients. Individual differences across providers were observed for the effect of race and ambiguity on decisions; however, providers' implicit and explicit biases did not account for this variability. These data highlight the complexity of racial disparities and suggest that differences in care between white and black patients are, in part, attributable to the nature (ie, ambiguity) of the clinical scenario. The current study suggests that interventions to reduce disparities should differentially target patient, provider, and contextual factors. Perspective This study examined the unique and collective influence of patient race, provider racial bias, and clinical ambiguity on providers' pain management decisions. These results could inform the development of interventions aimed at reducing disparities and improving pain care.

KW - bias

KW - decision making

KW - disparities

KW - Race

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930418059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930418059&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.03.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 25828370

AN - SCOPUS:84930418059

VL - 16

SP - 558

EP - 568

JO - Journal of Pain

JF - Journal of Pain

SN - 1526-5900

IS - 6

ER -