The jury is still out

Changes in gastroschisis management over the last decade are associated with both benefits and shortcomings

Brent R. Weil, Charles M. Leys, Frederick Rescorla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Management of gastroschisis has shifted from early primary closure to preformed silo placement and delayed closure. We aimed to identify how closure techniques have changed and how outcomes have been affected. Methods: Records of patients undergoing gastroschisis closure at a single institution from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared among those undergoing primary closure vs preformed silo placement. Outcomes were also compared in an era when primary closure predominated (2000-2002) vs one when primary silo predominated (2003-2009). Results: From 2000 to 2009, 203 patients underwent gastroschisis closure. Primary closure was performed in 50% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 12.3% from 2003 to 2009. Preformed silos were placed in 34.7% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 84.4% from 2003 to 2009. Patients treated from 2000 to 2002 experienced shorter hospital stays and shorter time to achievement of full enteral nutrition. Patients treated from 2003 to 2009 developed fewer ventral hernias and wound infections and required less ventilator days. Patients undergoing early primary closure developed ventral hernias at higher rates compared with those treated with preformed silos. Intensive care unit stay was longer for patients receiving preformed silos. Conclusion: Change in our management strategy has resulted in prolonged intensive care unit stay and time to full feeds but reduced postoperative hernias and wound infections.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Pediatric Surgery
Volume47
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Gastroschisis
Ventral Hernia
Intensive Care Units
Surgical Wound Infection
Enteral Nutrition
Wound Infection
Mechanical Ventilators
Length of Stay

Keywords

  • Abdominal wall defects
  • Congenital anomalies
  • Gastroschisis
  • Preformed silo

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

The jury is still out : Changes in gastroschisis management over the last decade are associated with both benefits and shortcomings. / Weil, Brent R.; Leys, Charles M.; Rescorla, Frederick.

In: Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Vol. 47, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 119-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8d5e6f7c3d404b13b5eea478f1be417b,
title = "The jury is still out: Changes in gastroschisis management over the last decade are associated with both benefits and shortcomings",
abstract = "Purpose: Management of gastroschisis has shifted from early primary closure to preformed silo placement and delayed closure. We aimed to identify how closure techniques have changed and how outcomes have been affected. Methods: Records of patients undergoing gastroschisis closure at a single institution from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared among those undergoing primary closure vs preformed silo placement. Outcomes were also compared in an era when primary closure predominated (2000-2002) vs one when primary silo predominated (2003-2009). Results: From 2000 to 2009, 203 patients underwent gastroschisis closure. Primary closure was performed in 50{\%} of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 12.3{\%} from 2003 to 2009. Preformed silos were placed in 34.7{\%} of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 84.4{\%} from 2003 to 2009. Patients treated from 2000 to 2002 experienced shorter hospital stays and shorter time to achievement of full enteral nutrition. Patients treated from 2003 to 2009 developed fewer ventral hernias and wound infections and required less ventilator days. Patients undergoing early primary closure developed ventral hernias at higher rates compared with those treated with preformed silos. Intensive care unit stay was longer for patients receiving preformed silos. Conclusion: Change in our management strategy has resulted in prolonged intensive care unit stay and time to full feeds but reduced postoperative hernias and wound infections.",
keywords = "Abdominal wall defects, Congenital anomalies, Gastroschisis, Preformed silo",
author = "Weil, {Brent R.} and Leys, {Charles M.} and Frederick Rescorla",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.10.029",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "119--124",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Surgery",
issn = "0022-3468",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The jury is still out

T2 - Changes in gastroschisis management over the last decade are associated with both benefits and shortcomings

AU - Weil, Brent R.

AU - Leys, Charles M.

AU - Rescorla, Frederick

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - Purpose: Management of gastroschisis has shifted from early primary closure to preformed silo placement and delayed closure. We aimed to identify how closure techniques have changed and how outcomes have been affected. Methods: Records of patients undergoing gastroschisis closure at a single institution from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared among those undergoing primary closure vs preformed silo placement. Outcomes were also compared in an era when primary closure predominated (2000-2002) vs one when primary silo predominated (2003-2009). Results: From 2000 to 2009, 203 patients underwent gastroschisis closure. Primary closure was performed in 50% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 12.3% from 2003 to 2009. Preformed silos were placed in 34.7% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 84.4% from 2003 to 2009. Patients treated from 2000 to 2002 experienced shorter hospital stays and shorter time to achievement of full enteral nutrition. Patients treated from 2003 to 2009 developed fewer ventral hernias and wound infections and required less ventilator days. Patients undergoing early primary closure developed ventral hernias at higher rates compared with those treated with preformed silos. Intensive care unit stay was longer for patients receiving preformed silos. Conclusion: Change in our management strategy has resulted in prolonged intensive care unit stay and time to full feeds but reduced postoperative hernias and wound infections.

AB - Purpose: Management of gastroschisis has shifted from early primary closure to preformed silo placement and delayed closure. We aimed to identify how closure techniques have changed and how outcomes have been affected. Methods: Records of patients undergoing gastroschisis closure at a single institution from 2000 to 2009 were reviewed. Patient characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared among those undergoing primary closure vs preformed silo placement. Outcomes were also compared in an era when primary closure predominated (2000-2002) vs one when primary silo predominated (2003-2009). Results: From 2000 to 2009, 203 patients underwent gastroschisis closure. Primary closure was performed in 50% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 12.3% from 2003 to 2009. Preformed silos were placed in 34.7% of patients from 2000 to 2002 vs 84.4% from 2003 to 2009. Patients treated from 2000 to 2002 experienced shorter hospital stays and shorter time to achievement of full enteral nutrition. Patients treated from 2003 to 2009 developed fewer ventral hernias and wound infections and required less ventilator days. Patients undergoing early primary closure developed ventral hernias at higher rates compared with those treated with preformed silos. Intensive care unit stay was longer for patients receiving preformed silos. Conclusion: Change in our management strategy has resulted in prolonged intensive care unit stay and time to full feeds but reduced postoperative hernias and wound infections.

KW - Abdominal wall defects

KW - Congenital anomalies

KW - Gastroschisis

KW - Preformed silo

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855850689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855850689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.10.029

DO - 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.10.029

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 119

EP - 124

JO - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

JF - Journal of Pediatric Surgery

SN - 0022-3468

IS - 1

ER -