The Morphology Index

Predictive value of malignancy among clinicians at various levels of training

Kris Barnsfather, C. Brennan Fitzpatrick, Jill Wilson, Cady L. Linn, Edward Brizendine, Jeanne Schilder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether clinicians at various levels of training can reproduce and apply the Morphology Index when compared to Ueland's Morphology Index data, and to determine intra-observer variability when applied by observers at various levels of training. Methods: One hundred four transvaginal ultrasound images of adnexal masses obtained at Indiana University between 1991 and 2003 were identified which had correlating surgical pathology. The images were scored by four investigators at four different levels of training. Scoring was based upon the revised University of Kentucky Morphology Index by Ueland. Each mass received 0-5 points for its structure, and 0-5 points for tumor volume. Each total score was then correlated with the surgical pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each investigator were determined. All images were reviewed independently by each investigator; each was blinded to scores given by the other investigators and to final pathology. Results: Nine malignant and 95 benign masses were noted on final pathology. Ranges for statistical values were: positive predictive value (PPV) 15-18%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93-98%, sensitivity 44-89%, and specificity 52-76%. Conclusion: The Morphology Index is a consistent and reliable tool for predicting benign disease demonstrating a high negative predictive value with little intra-observer variability. However, when predicting malignancy, the results showed more intra-observer variability and a positive predictive value half of that previously reported. This study confirms the clinical utility of the Morphology Index when utilized for its NPV and demonstrates its widespread application even among clinicians with minimal ultrasound training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-97
Number of pages4
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume127
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012

Fingerprint

Observer Variation
Research Personnel
Surgical Pathology
Neoplasms
Pathology
Tumor Burden
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Adnexal mass
  • Ovarian cancer screening
  • Ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Oncology

Cite this

The Morphology Index : Predictive value of malignancy among clinicians at various levels of training. / Barnsfather, Kris; Fitzpatrick, C. Brennan; Wilson, Jill; Linn, Cady L.; Brizendine, Edward; Schilder, Jeanne.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 127, No. 1, 10.2012, p. 94-97.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Barnsfather, Kris ; Fitzpatrick, C. Brennan ; Wilson, Jill ; Linn, Cady L. ; Brizendine, Edward ; Schilder, Jeanne. / The Morphology Index : Predictive value of malignancy among clinicians at various levels of training. In: Gynecologic Oncology. 2012 ; Vol. 127, No. 1. pp. 94-97.
@article{db464cff557642088b2ce88925af7c0e,
title = "The Morphology Index: Predictive value of malignancy among clinicians at various levels of training",
abstract = "Objective: To determine whether clinicians at various levels of training can reproduce and apply the Morphology Index when compared to Ueland's Morphology Index data, and to determine intra-observer variability when applied by observers at various levels of training. Methods: One hundred four transvaginal ultrasound images of adnexal masses obtained at Indiana University between 1991 and 2003 were identified which had correlating surgical pathology. The images were scored by four investigators at four different levels of training. Scoring was based upon the revised University of Kentucky Morphology Index by Ueland. Each mass received 0-5 points for its structure, and 0-5 points for tumor volume. Each total score was then correlated with the surgical pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each investigator were determined. All images were reviewed independently by each investigator; each was blinded to scores given by the other investigators and to final pathology. Results: Nine malignant and 95 benign masses were noted on final pathology. Ranges for statistical values were: positive predictive value (PPV) 15-18{\%}, negative predictive value (NPV) 93-98{\%}, sensitivity 44-89{\%}, and specificity 52-76{\%}. Conclusion: The Morphology Index is a consistent and reliable tool for predicting benign disease demonstrating a high negative predictive value with little intra-observer variability. However, when predicting malignancy, the results showed more intra-observer variability and a positive predictive value half of that previously reported. This study confirms the clinical utility of the Morphology Index when utilized for its NPV and demonstrates its widespread application even among clinicians with minimal ultrasound training.",
keywords = "Adnexal mass, Ovarian cancer screening, Ultrasound",
author = "Kris Barnsfather and Fitzpatrick, {C. Brennan} and Jill Wilson and Linn, {Cady L.} and Edward Brizendine and Jeanne Schilder",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "94--97",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Morphology Index

T2 - Predictive value of malignancy among clinicians at various levels of training

AU - Barnsfather, Kris

AU - Fitzpatrick, C. Brennan

AU - Wilson, Jill

AU - Linn, Cady L.

AU - Brizendine, Edward

AU - Schilder, Jeanne

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Objective: To determine whether clinicians at various levels of training can reproduce and apply the Morphology Index when compared to Ueland's Morphology Index data, and to determine intra-observer variability when applied by observers at various levels of training. Methods: One hundred four transvaginal ultrasound images of adnexal masses obtained at Indiana University between 1991 and 2003 were identified which had correlating surgical pathology. The images were scored by four investigators at four different levels of training. Scoring was based upon the revised University of Kentucky Morphology Index by Ueland. Each mass received 0-5 points for its structure, and 0-5 points for tumor volume. Each total score was then correlated with the surgical pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each investigator were determined. All images were reviewed independently by each investigator; each was blinded to scores given by the other investigators and to final pathology. Results: Nine malignant and 95 benign masses were noted on final pathology. Ranges for statistical values were: positive predictive value (PPV) 15-18%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93-98%, sensitivity 44-89%, and specificity 52-76%. Conclusion: The Morphology Index is a consistent and reliable tool for predicting benign disease demonstrating a high negative predictive value with little intra-observer variability. However, when predicting malignancy, the results showed more intra-observer variability and a positive predictive value half of that previously reported. This study confirms the clinical utility of the Morphology Index when utilized for its NPV and demonstrates its widespread application even among clinicians with minimal ultrasound training.

AB - Objective: To determine whether clinicians at various levels of training can reproduce and apply the Morphology Index when compared to Ueland's Morphology Index data, and to determine intra-observer variability when applied by observers at various levels of training. Methods: One hundred four transvaginal ultrasound images of adnexal masses obtained at Indiana University between 1991 and 2003 were identified which had correlating surgical pathology. The images were scored by four investigators at four different levels of training. Scoring was based upon the revised University of Kentucky Morphology Index by Ueland. Each mass received 0-5 points for its structure, and 0-5 points for tumor volume. Each total score was then correlated with the surgical pathology. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each investigator were determined. All images were reviewed independently by each investigator; each was blinded to scores given by the other investigators and to final pathology. Results: Nine malignant and 95 benign masses were noted on final pathology. Ranges for statistical values were: positive predictive value (PPV) 15-18%, negative predictive value (NPV) 93-98%, sensitivity 44-89%, and specificity 52-76%. Conclusion: The Morphology Index is a consistent and reliable tool for predicting benign disease demonstrating a high negative predictive value with little intra-observer variability. However, when predicting malignancy, the results showed more intra-observer variability and a positive predictive value half of that previously reported. This study confirms the clinical utility of the Morphology Index when utilized for its NPV and demonstrates its widespread application even among clinicians with minimal ultrasound training.

KW - Adnexal mass

KW - Ovarian cancer screening

KW - Ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865687908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865687908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.043

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.043

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 94

EP - 97

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 1

ER -