The process-knowledge model of health literacy: Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures

Jessie Chin, Daniel G. Morrow, Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow, Thembi Conner-Garcia, James F. Graumlich, Michael Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)222-241
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Health Communication
Volume16
Issue numberSUPPL. 3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
literacy
Health
Aptitude
health
evidence
Processing
Independent Living
Vocabulary
ability
Short-Term Memory
performance
level of knowledge
hypertension
weighting
Health care
Hypertension
Delivery of Health Care
vocabulary
health care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health(social science)
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Communication

Cite this

The process-knowledge model of health literacy : Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures. / Chin, Jessie; Morrow, Daniel G.; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L; Conner-Garcia, Thembi; Graumlich, James F.; Murray, Michael.

In: Journal of Health Communication, Vol. 16, No. SUPPL. 3, 2011, p. 222-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chin, Jessie ; Morrow, Daniel G. ; Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L ; Conner-Garcia, Thembi ; Graumlich, James F. ; Murray, Michael. / The process-knowledge model of health literacy : Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures. In: Journal of Health Communication. 2011 ; Vol. 16, No. SUPPL. 3. pp. 222-241.
@article{a901feb65845489c981b7358fb187567,
title = "The process-knowledge model of health literacy: Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures",
abstract = "We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.",
author = "Jessie Chin and Morrow, {Daniel G.} and Stine-Morrow, {Elizabeth A L} and Thembi Conner-Garcia and Graumlich, {James F.} and Michael Murray",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1080/10810730.2011.604702",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "222--241",
journal = "Journal of Health Communication",
issn = "1081-0730",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "SUPPL. 3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The process-knowledge model of health literacy

T2 - Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures

AU - Chin, Jessie

AU - Morrow, Daniel G.

AU - Stine-Morrow, Elizabeth A L

AU - Conner-Garcia, Thembi

AU - Graumlich, James F.

AU - Murray, Michael

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.

AB - We investigated the effects of domain-general processing capacity (fluid ability such as working memory), domain-general knowledge (crystallized ability such as vocabulary), and domain-specific health knowledge for two of the most commonly used measures of health literacy (S-TOFHLA and REALM). One hundred forty six community-dwelling older adults participated; 103 had been diagnosed with hypertension. The results showed that older adults who had higher levels of processing capacity or knowledge (domain-general or health) performed better on both of the health literacy measures. Processing capacity interacted with knowledge: Processing capacity had a lower level of association with health literacy for participants with more knowledge than for those with lower levels of knowledge, suggesting that knowledge may offset the effects of processing capacity limitations on health literacy. Furthermore, performance on the two health literacy measures appeared to reflect a different weighting for the three types of abilities. S-TOFHLA performance reflected processing capacity as well as general knowledge, whereas performance on the REALM depended more on general and health knowledge than on processing capacity. The findings support a process-knowledge model of health literacy among older adults, and have implications for selecting health literacy measures in various health care contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053556697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053556697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10810730.2011.604702

DO - 10.1080/10810730.2011.604702

M3 - Article

C2 - 21951254

AN - SCOPUS:80053556697

VL - 16

SP - 222

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Health Communication

JF - Journal of Health Communication

SN - 1081-0730

IS - SUPPL. 3

ER -