The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: A Pilot Study

Susan Hickman, Bernard J. Hammes, Alexia Torke, Rebecca L. Sudore, Greg Sachs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms are used to document patient treatment preferences as medical orders. Prior research demonstrates that use of POLST alters medical treatments in a way that is consistent with the POLST orders. However, there are minimal data about the quality of POLST decisions, including whether they reflect the current preferences of well-informed patients. Objective: Evaluate the quality of POLST decisions. Design: Chart abstraction; interviews. Subjects: Nursing home residents and healthcare agents of incapacitated nursing home residents (n = 28). Measurements: Characteristics of the POLST conversation were assessed. Brief vignettes were used to assess knowledge about how POLST orders guide medical treatment. Current treatment preferences were elicited and compared with the patient's POLST orders to assess discordance. Results: A majority (59%) of participants recognized the POLST form. Participants were generally accurate in their knowledge of how POLST orders guide treatment concerning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (68%), antibiotics (74%), and artificial nutrition (79%), but less so for medical interventions (50%). Current treatment preferences were initially discordant with one or more POLST orders for 64% (18/28) of participants, but half of these discordances were resolved with further discussion (e.g., participant agreed with the existing order). Discordance by treatment decision was as follows: CPR (7%), level of medical intervention (18%), antibiotics (21%), and artificial nutrition (11%). Conclusions: Discordance between current preferences and POLST orders is complex. Interventions are needed to support high-quality POLST decisions that are informed and concordant with current preferences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)155-162
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Palliative Medicine
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2017

Fingerprint

Physicians
Therapeutics
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Nursing Homes
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Patient Preference
Interviews
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • advance directives
  • bioethics
  • geriatric palliative care end-of-life
  • nursing home

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions : A Pilot Study. / Hickman, Susan; Hammes, Bernard J.; Torke, Alexia; Sudore, Rebecca L.; Sachs, Greg.

In: Journal of Palliative Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.02.2017, p. 155-162.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{68cf100891e6499f9ab694870642f4c2,
title = "The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: A Pilot Study",
abstract = "Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms are used to document patient treatment preferences as medical orders. Prior research demonstrates that use of POLST alters medical treatments in a way that is consistent with the POLST orders. However, there are minimal data about the quality of POLST decisions, including whether they reflect the current preferences of well-informed patients. Objective: Evaluate the quality of POLST decisions. Design: Chart abstraction; interviews. Subjects: Nursing home residents and healthcare agents of incapacitated nursing home residents (n = 28). Measurements: Characteristics of the POLST conversation were assessed. Brief vignettes were used to assess knowledge about how POLST orders guide medical treatment. Current treatment preferences were elicited and compared with the patient's POLST orders to assess discordance. Results: A majority (59{\%}) of participants recognized the POLST form. Participants were generally accurate in their knowledge of how POLST orders guide treatment concerning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (68{\%}), antibiotics (74{\%}), and artificial nutrition (79{\%}), but less so for medical interventions (50{\%}). Current treatment preferences were initially discordant with one or more POLST orders for 64{\%} (18/28) of participants, but half of these discordances were resolved with further discussion (e.g., participant agreed with the existing order). Discordance by treatment decision was as follows: CPR (7{\%}), level of medical intervention (18{\%}), antibiotics (21{\%}), and artificial nutrition (11{\%}). Conclusions: Discordance between current preferences and POLST orders is complex. Interventions are needed to support high-quality POLST decisions that are informed and concordant with current preferences.",
keywords = "advance directives, bioethics, geriatric palliative care end-of-life, nursing home",
author = "Susan Hickman and Hammes, {Bernard J.} and Alexia Torke and Sudore, {Rebecca L.} and Greg Sachs",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/jpm.2016.0059",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "155--162",
journal = "Journal of Palliative Medicine",
issn = "1096-6218",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Quality of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions

T2 - A Pilot Study

AU - Hickman, Susan

AU - Hammes, Bernard J.

AU - Torke, Alexia

AU - Sudore, Rebecca L.

AU - Sachs, Greg

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms are used to document patient treatment preferences as medical orders. Prior research demonstrates that use of POLST alters medical treatments in a way that is consistent with the POLST orders. However, there are minimal data about the quality of POLST decisions, including whether they reflect the current preferences of well-informed patients. Objective: Evaluate the quality of POLST decisions. Design: Chart abstraction; interviews. Subjects: Nursing home residents and healthcare agents of incapacitated nursing home residents (n = 28). Measurements: Characteristics of the POLST conversation were assessed. Brief vignettes were used to assess knowledge about how POLST orders guide medical treatment. Current treatment preferences were elicited and compared with the patient's POLST orders to assess discordance. Results: A majority (59%) of participants recognized the POLST form. Participants were generally accurate in their knowledge of how POLST orders guide treatment concerning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (68%), antibiotics (74%), and artificial nutrition (79%), but less so for medical interventions (50%). Current treatment preferences were initially discordant with one or more POLST orders for 64% (18/28) of participants, but half of these discordances were resolved with further discussion (e.g., participant agreed with the existing order). Discordance by treatment decision was as follows: CPR (7%), level of medical intervention (18%), antibiotics (21%), and artificial nutrition (11%). Conclusions: Discordance between current preferences and POLST orders is complex. Interventions are needed to support high-quality POLST decisions that are informed and concordant with current preferences.

AB - Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms are used to document patient treatment preferences as medical orders. Prior research demonstrates that use of POLST alters medical treatments in a way that is consistent with the POLST orders. However, there are minimal data about the quality of POLST decisions, including whether they reflect the current preferences of well-informed patients. Objective: Evaluate the quality of POLST decisions. Design: Chart abstraction; interviews. Subjects: Nursing home residents and healthcare agents of incapacitated nursing home residents (n = 28). Measurements: Characteristics of the POLST conversation were assessed. Brief vignettes were used to assess knowledge about how POLST orders guide medical treatment. Current treatment preferences were elicited and compared with the patient's POLST orders to assess discordance. Results: A majority (59%) of participants recognized the POLST form. Participants were generally accurate in their knowledge of how POLST orders guide treatment concerning cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (68%), antibiotics (74%), and artificial nutrition (79%), but less so for medical interventions (50%). Current treatment preferences were initially discordant with one or more POLST orders for 64% (18/28) of participants, but half of these discordances were resolved with further discussion (e.g., participant agreed with the existing order). Discordance by treatment decision was as follows: CPR (7%), level of medical intervention (18%), antibiotics (21%), and artificial nutrition (11%). Conclusions: Discordance between current preferences and POLST orders is complex. Interventions are needed to support high-quality POLST decisions that are informed and concordant with current preferences.

KW - advance directives

KW - bioethics

KW - geriatric palliative care end-of-life

KW - nursing home

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85009742450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85009742450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/jpm.2016.0059

DO - 10.1089/jpm.2016.0059

M3 - Article

C2 - 27802064

AN - SCOPUS:85009742450

VL - 20

SP - 155

EP - 162

JO - Journal of Palliative Medicine

JF - Journal of Palliative Medicine

SN - 1096-6218

IS - 2

ER -