The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention

Ingrid Ekenman, Charles Milgrom, Aharon Finestone, Michal Begin, Carin Olin, Toni Arndt, David Burr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Biomechanical orthoses have been shown to lower stress fracture incidence in infantry recruits. However, these results may not be applicable to running athletes. Hypothesis: Training in either running shoes or military boots with custom biomechanical shoe orthoses lessens tibial bone strains and strain rates during walking and running. Study Design: Randomized controlled laboratory study. Methods: In vivo strain measurements were made in nine subjects to determine whether the use of biomechanical orthoses lowers tibial strains during both walking and running and whether such lowering depends on the type of shoe worn. Measurements were made during treadmill walking at 5 km/hr and then during serial 2-km treadmill runs at 13 km/hr with running shoes, with and without the orthoses, and during serial 1-km runs with army boots, with and without the orthoses. Results: When soft or semirigid biomechanical orthoses were worn with boots, the tibial peak-to-peak strains were significantly lowered. Soft orthoses also significantly lowered the tension and compression strain rates when worn with boots. During running, semirigid orthoses significantly increased the compression and tension strain rates when worn with boots. Conclusions: The use of biomechanical orthoses may be warranted for tibial stress fracture prevention during training in which boots are worn and that mostly involves walking, but they are not warranted for activities that primarily involve running or are performed in running shoes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)866-870
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume30
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1 2002

Fingerprint

Orthotic Devices
Stress Fractures
Tibial Fractures
Shoes
Running
Walking
Athletes
Bone and Bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Ekenman, I., Milgrom, C., Finestone, A., Begin, M., Olin, C., Arndt, T., & Burr, D. (2002). The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 30(6), 866-870.

The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention. / Ekenman, Ingrid; Milgrom, Charles; Finestone, Aharon; Begin, Michal; Olin, Carin; Arndt, Toni; Burr, David.

In: American Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 30, No. 6, 01.12.2002, p. 866-870.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ekenman, I, Milgrom, C, Finestone, A, Begin, M, Olin, C, Arndt, T & Burr, D 2002, 'The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention', American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 866-870.
Ekenman I, Milgrom C, Finestone A, Begin M, Olin C, Arndt T et al. The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention. American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2002 Dec 1;30(6):866-870.
Ekenman, Ingrid ; Milgrom, Charles ; Finestone, Aharon ; Begin, Michal ; Olin, Carin ; Arndt, Toni ; Burr, David. / The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention. In: American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 30, No. 6. pp. 866-870.
@article{442b22acc33043f2a944f1990e454c1b,
title = "The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention",
abstract = "Background: Biomechanical orthoses have been shown to lower stress fracture incidence in infantry recruits. However, these results may not be applicable to running athletes. Hypothesis: Training in either running shoes or military boots with custom biomechanical shoe orthoses lessens tibial bone strains and strain rates during walking and running. Study Design: Randomized controlled laboratory study. Methods: In vivo strain measurements were made in nine subjects to determine whether the use of biomechanical orthoses lowers tibial strains during both walking and running and whether such lowering depends on the type of shoe worn. Measurements were made during treadmill walking at 5 km/hr and then during serial 2-km treadmill runs at 13 km/hr with running shoes, with and without the orthoses, and during serial 1-km runs with army boots, with and without the orthoses. Results: When soft or semirigid biomechanical orthoses were worn with boots, the tibial peak-to-peak strains were significantly lowered. Soft orthoses also significantly lowered the tension and compression strain rates when worn with boots. During running, semirigid orthoses significantly increased the compression and tension strain rates when worn with boots. Conclusions: The use of biomechanical orthoses may be warranted for tibial stress fracture prevention during training in which boots are worn and that mostly involves walking, but they are not warranted for activities that primarily involve running or are performed in running shoes.",
author = "Ingrid Ekenman and Charles Milgrom and Aharon Finestone and Michal Begin and Carin Olin and Toni Arndt and David Burr",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "866--870",
journal = "American Journal of Sports Medicine",
issn = "0363-5465",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of biomechanical shoe orthoses in tibial stress fracture prevention

AU - Ekenman, Ingrid

AU - Milgrom, Charles

AU - Finestone, Aharon

AU - Begin, Michal

AU - Olin, Carin

AU - Arndt, Toni

AU - Burr, David

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Background: Biomechanical orthoses have been shown to lower stress fracture incidence in infantry recruits. However, these results may not be applicable to running athletes. Hypothesis: Training in either running shoes or military boots with custom biomechanical shoe orthoses lessens tibial bone strains and strain rates during walking and running. Study Design: Randomized controlled laboratory study. Methods: In vivo strain measurements were made in nine subjects to determine whether the use of biomechanical orthoses lowers tibial strains during both walking and running and whether such lowering depends on the type of shoe worn. Measurements were made during treadmill walking at 5 km/hr and then during serial 2-km treadmill runs at 13 km/hr with running shoes, with and without the orthoses, and during serial 1-km runs with army boots, with and without the orthoses. Results: When soft or semirigid biomechanical orthoses were worn with boots, the tibial peak-to-peak strains were significantly lowered. Soft orthoses also significantly lowered the tension and compression strain rates when worn with boots. During running, semirigid orthoses significantly increased the compression and tension strain rates when worn with boots. Conclusions: The use of biomechanical orthoses may be warranted for tibial stress fracture prevention during training in which boots are worn and that mostly involves walking, but they are not warranted for activities that primarily involve running or are performed in running shoes.

AB - Background: Biomechanical orthoses have been shown to lower stress fracture incidence in infantry recruits. However, these results may not be applicable to running athletes. Hypothesis: Training in either running shoes or military boots with custom biomechanical shoe orthoses lessens tibial bone strains and strain rates during walking and running. Study Design: Randomized controlled laboratory study. Methods: In vivo strain measurements were made in nine subjects to determine whether the use of biomechanical orthoses lowers tibial strains during both walking and running and whether such lowering depends on the type of shoe worn. Measurements were made during treadmill walking at 5 km/hr and then during serial 2-km treadmill runs at 13 km/hr with running shoes, with and without the orthoses, and during serial 1-km runs with army boots, with and without the orthoses. Results: When soft or semirigid biomechanical orthoses were worn with boots, the tibial peak-to-peak strains were significantly lowered. Soft orthoses also significantly lowered the tension and compression strain rates when worn with boots. During running, semirigid orthoses significantly increased the compression and tension strain rates when worn with boots. Conclusions: The use of biomechanical orthoses may be warranted for tibial stress fracture prevention during training in which boots are worn and that mostly involves walking, but they are not warranted for activities that primarily involve running or are performed in running shoes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036892053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036892053&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12435654

AN - SCOPUS:0036892053

VL - 30

SP - 866

EP - 870

JO - American Journal of Sports Medicine

JF - American Journal of Sports Medicine

SN - 0363-5465

IS - 6

ER -