The role of routine postoperative stentograms in the pediatric patient undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation

Stanton M. Regan, Richard C. Rink, Martin Kaefer, Kirstan D. Meldrum, Rosalia Misseri, Mark P. Cain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To determine the usefulness of routine stentograms in postoperative management of pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation from March 2003 to March 2008 at one center was performed. One hundred patients were identified. Seventeen had stentograms performed approximately 2 weeks (1-5 weeks) after surgery. The 83 without stentograms composed the control group. Results: Of the 17 pediatric patients with postoperative stentograms, 10 (59%) had no contrast observed in the bladder. Ureteral stents were removed despite this finding. No anastamotic leaks were observed. In this group, not one had a postoperative complication at time of follow up (mean 25 months; range 4-52). Of the 83 patients without stentograms, not one had clinical signs of anastamotic leakage or obstruction at discharge. The stents were removed routinely 2 weeks (range 1-8) after surgery. Nine patients (10.8%) developed ureteral obstruction (mean 7 weeks; range 1-24) requiring intervention. Three of these patients required a second operation. Conclusions: Since routine stentograms rarely identify ureteral leak, and poor drainage on postoperative stentogram does not indicate a risk of obstruction, these studies are not required following routine excisional tapered ureteral reimplant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)472-474
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Pediatric Urology
Volume5
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Fingerprint

Replantation
Pediatrics
Stents
Ureteral Obstruction
Drainage
Urinary Bladder
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Stentogram
  • Stents
  • Ureteral reimplantation
  • Ureteroneocystostomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

The role of routine postoperative stentograms in the pediatric patient undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation. / Regan, Stanton M.; Rink, Richard C.; Kaefer, Martin; Meldrum, Kirstan D.; Misseri, Rosalia; Cain, Mark P.

In: Journal of Pediatric Urology, Vol. 5, No. 6, 12.2009, p. 472-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Regan, Stanton M. ; Rink, Richard C. ; Kaefer, Martin ; Meldrum, Kirstan D. ; Misseri, Rosalia ; Cain, Mark P. / The role of routine postoperative stentograms in the pediatric patient undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation. In: Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2009 ; Vol. 5, No. 6. pp. 472-474.
@article{bc98c4c785aa41c393fdc36c434667b2,
title = "The role of routine postoperative stentograms in the pediatric patient undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the usefulness of routine stentograms in postoperative management of pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation from March 2003 to March 2008 at one center was performed. One hundred patients were identified. Seventeen had stentograms performed approximately 2 weeks (1-5 weeks) after surgery. The 83 without stentograms composed the control group. Results: Of the 17 pediatric patients with postoperative stentograms, 10 (59{\%}) had no contrast observed in the bladder. Ureteral stents were removed despite this finding. No anastamotic leaks were observed. In this group, not one had a postoperative complication at time of follow up (mean 25 months; range 4-52). Of the 83 patients without stentograms, not one had clinical signs of anastamotic leakage or obstruction at discharge. The stents were removed routinely 2 weeks (range 1-8) after surgery. Nine patients (10.8{\%}) developed ureteral obstruction (mean 7 weeks; range 1-24) requiring intervention. Three of these patients required a second operation. Conclusions: Since routine stentograms rarely identify ureteral leak, and poor drainage on postoperative stentogram does not indicate a risk of obstruction, these studies are not required following routine excisional tapered ureteral reimplant.",
keywords = "Stentogram, Stents, Ureteral reimplantation, Ureteroneocystostomy",
author = "Regan, {Stanton M.} and Rink, {Richard C.} and Martin Kaefer and Meldrum, {Kirstan D.} and Rosalia Misseri and Cain, {Mark P.}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.006",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "472--474",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Urology",
issn = "1477-5131",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of routine postoperative stentograms in the pediatric patient undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation

AU - Regan, Stanton M.

AU - Rink, Richard C.

AU - Kaefer, Martin

AU - Meldrum, Kirstan D.

AU - Misseri, Rosalia

AU - Cain, Mark P.

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - Objective: To determine the usefulness of routine stentograms in postoperative management of pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation from March 2003 to March 2008 at one center was performed. One hundred patients were identified. Seventeen had stentograms performed approximately 2 weeks (1-5 weeks) after surgery. The 83 without stentograms composed the control group. Results: Of the 17 pediatric patients with postoperative stentograms, 10 (59%) had no contrast observed in the bladder. Ureteral stents were removed despite this finding. No anastamotic leaks were observed. In this group, not one had a postoperative complication at time of follow up (mean 25 months; range 4-52). Of the 83 patients without stentograms, not one had clinical signs of anastamotic leakage or obstruction at discharge. The stents were removed routinely 2 weeks (range 1-8) after surgery. Nine patients (10.8%) developed ureteral obstruction (mean 7 weeks; range 1-24) requiring intervention. Three of these patients required a second operation. Conclusions: Since routine stentograms rarely identify ureteral leak, and poor drainage on postoperative stentogram does not indicate a risk of obstruction, these studies are not required following routine excisional tapered ureteral reimplant.

AB - Objective: To determine the usefulness of routine stentograms in postoperative management of pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of all pediatric patients undergoing excisional tapered ureteral reimplantation from March 2003 to March 2008 at one center was performed. One hundred patients were identified. Seventeen had stentograms performed approximately 2 weeks (1-5 weeks) after surgery. The 83 without stentograms composed the control group. Results: Of the 17 pediatric patients with postoperative stentograms, 10 (59%) had no contrast observed in the bladder. Ureteral stents were removed despite this finding. No anastamotic leaks were observed. In this group, not one had a postoperative complication at time of follow up (mean 25 months; range 4-52). Of the 83 patients without stentograms, not one had clinical signs of anastamotic leakage or obstruction at discharge. The stents were removed routinely 2 weeks (range 1-8) after surgery. Nine patients (10.8%) developed ureteral obstruction (mean 7 weeks; range 1-24) requiring intervention. Three of these patients required a second operation. Conclusions: Since routine stentograms rarely identify ureteral leak, and poor drainage on postoperative stentogram does not indicate a risk of obstruction, these studies are not required following routine excisional tapered ureteral reimplant.

KW - Stentogram

KW - Stents

KW - Ureteral reimplantation

KW - Ureteroneocystostomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70449133489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70449133489&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 19362519

AN - SCOPUS:70449133489

VL - 5

SP - 472

EP - 474

JO - Journal of Pediatric Urology

JF - Journal of Pediatric Urology

SN - 1477-5131

IS - 6

ER -