The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth

Joon Young Kim, Sara F. Michaliszyn, Alexis Nasr, So Jung Lee, Hala Tfayli, Tamara Hannon, Kara S. Hughan, Fida Bacha, Silva Arslanian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), monophasic versus biphasic, identifies physiologically distinct groups of individuals with differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We aimed to verify the value of the OGTT-glucose response curve against more sensitive clampmeasured biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk, and to examine incretin/pancreatic hormones and free fatty acid associations in these curve phenotypes in obese adolescents without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 277 obese adolescents without diabetes completed a 2-h OGTT and were categorized to either a monophasic or a biphasic group. Body composition, abdominal adipose tissue, OGTT-based metabolic parameters, and incretin/pancreatic hormone levels were examined. A subset of 106 participants had both hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps to measure in vivo insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. RESULTS: Despite similar fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, the monophasic group had significantly higher glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid OGTT areas under the curve compared with the biphasic group, with no differences in levels of glucagon, total glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and pancreatic polypeptide. Furthermore, the monophasic group had significantly lower in vivo hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, lack of compensatory first and second phase insulin secretion, and impaired β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In obese youth without diabetes, the risk imparted by the monophasic glucose curve compared with biphasic glucose curve, independent of fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, is reflected in lower insulin sensitivity and poorer β-cell function, which are two major pathophysiological biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in youth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1431-1439
Number of pages9
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume39
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2016

Fingerprint

Glucose Tolerance Test
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Biomarkers
Insulin Resistance
Glucose
Insulin
Pancreatic Hormones
Incretins
Nonesterified Fatty Acids
Fasting
Pancreatic Polypeptide
Abdominal Fat
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
C-Peptide
Body Composition
Glucagon
Individuality
Area Under Curve
Research Design
Phenotype

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Medicine(all)
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth. / Kim, Joon Young; Michaliszyn, Sara F.; Nasr, Alexis; Lee, So Jung; Tfayli, Hala; Hannon, Tamara; Hughan, Kara S.; Bacha, Fida; Arslanian, Silva.

In: Diabetes Care, Vol. 39, No. 8, 01.08.2016, p. 1431-1439.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kim, JY, Michaliszyn, SF, Nasr, A, Lee, SJ, Tfayli, H, Hannon, T, Hughan, KS, Bacha, F & Arslanian, S 2016, 'The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth', Diabetes Care, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 1431-1439. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-0352
Kim, Joon Young ; Michaliszyn, Sara F. ; Nasr, Alexis ; Lee, So Jung ; Tfayli, Hala ; Hannon, Tamara ; Hughan, Kara S. ; Bacha, Fida ; Arslanian, Silva. / The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth. In: Diabetes Care. 2016 ; Vol. 39, No. 8. pp. 1431-1439.
@article{ae815c86ca3b4572b83f2c9721b89dcc,
title = "The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), monophasic versus biphasic, identifies physiologically distinct groups of individuals with differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We aimed to verify the value of the OGTT-glucose response curve against more sensitive clampmeasured biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk, and to examine incretin/pancreatic hormones and free fatty acid associations in these curve phenotypes in obese adolescents without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 277 obese adolescents without diabetes completed a 2-h OGTT and were categorized to either a monophasic or a biphasic group. Body composition, abdominal adipose tissue, OGTT-based metabolic parameters, and incretin/pancreatic hormone levels were examined. A subset of 106 participants had both hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps to measure in vivo insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. RESULTS: Despite similar fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, the monophasic group had significantly higher glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid OGTT areas under the curve compared with the biphasic group, with no differences in levels of glucagon, total glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and pancreatic polypeptide. Furthermore, the monophasic group had significantly lower in vivo hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, lack of compensatory first and second phase insulin secretion, and impaired β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In obese youth without diabetes, the risk imparted by the monophasic glucose curve compared with biphasic glucose curve, independent of fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, is reflected in lower insulin sensitivity and poorer β-cell function, which are two major pathophysiological biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in youth.",
author = "Kim, {Joon Young} and Michaliszyn, {Sara F.} and Alexis Nasr and Lee, {So Jung} and Hala Tfayli and Tamara Hannon and Hughan, {Kara S.} and Fida Bacha and Silva Arslanian",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2337/dc16-0352",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1431--1439",
journal = "Diabetes Care",
issn = "1935-5548",
publisher = "American Diabetes Association Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test heralds biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk in obese youth

AU - Kim, Joon Young

AU - Michaliszyn, Sara F.

AU - Nasr, Alexis

AU - Lee, So Jung

AU - Tfayli, Hala

AU - Hannon, Tamara

AU - Hughan, Kara S.

AU - Bacha, Fida

AU - Arslanian, Silva

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), monophasic versus biphasic, identifies physiologically distinct groups of individuals with differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We aimed to verify the value of the OGTT-glucose response curve against more sensitive clampmeasured biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk, and to examine incretin/pancreatic hormones and free fatty acid associations in these curve phenotypes in obese adolescents without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 277 obese adolescents without diabetes completed a 2-h OGTT and were categorized to either a monophasic or a biphasic group. Body composition, abdominal adipose tissue, OGTT-based metabolic parameters, and incretin/pancreatic hormone levels were examined. A subset of 106 participants had both hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps to measure in vivo insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. RESULTS: Despite similar fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, the monophasic group had significantly higher glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid OGTT areas under the curve compared with the biphasic group, with no differences in levels of glucagon, total glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and pancreatic polypeptide. Furthermore, the monophasic group had significantly lower in vivo hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, lack of compensatory first and second phase insulin secretion, and impaired β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In obese youth without diabetes, the risk imparted by the monophasic glucose curve compared with biphasic glucose curve, independent of fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, is reflected in lower insulin sensitivity and poorer β-cell function, which are two major pathophysiological biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in youth.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The shape of the glucose response curve during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), monophasic versus biphasic, identifies physiologically distinct groups of individuals with differences in insulin secretion and sensitivity. We aimed to verify the value of the OGTT-glucose response curve against more sensitive clampmeasured biomarkers of type 2 diabetes risk, and to examine incretin/pancreatic hormones and free fatty acid associations in these curve phenotypes in obese adolescents without diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 277 obese adolescents without diabetes completed a 2-h OGTT and were categorized to either a monophasic or a biphasic group. Body composition, abdominal adipose tissue, OGTT-based metabolic parameters, and incretin/pancreatic hormone levels were examined. A subset of 106 participants had both hyperinsulinemiceuglycemic and hyperglycemic clamps to measure in vivo insulin sensitivity, insulin secretion, and β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. RESULTS: Despite similar fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, the monophasic group had significantly higher glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and free fatty acid OGTT areas under the curve compared with the biphasic group, with no differences in levels of glucagon, total glucagon-like peptide 1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, and pancreatic polypeptide. Furthermore, the monophasic group had significantly lower in vivo hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity, lack of compensatory first and second phase insulin secretion, and impaired β-cell function relative to insulin sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: In obese youth without diabetes, the risk imparted by the monophasic glucose curve compared with biphasic glucose curve, independent of fasting and 2-h glucose and insulin concentrations, is reflected in lower insulin sensitivity and poorer β-cell function, which are two major pathophysiological biomarkers of type 2 diabetes in youth.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84980360412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84980360412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2337/dc16-0352

DO - 10.2337/dc16-0352

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 1431

EP - 1439

JO - Diabetes Care

JF - Diabetes Care

SN - 1935-5548

IS - 8

ER -