The standardized vascular clinic

An alternative to the traditional ambulatory setting

Maura E. Sullivan, Glenn T. Ault, Douglas B. Hood, Jeanine R. Chalabian, Jeremy Pripstein, Nicolas Jabbour, Gary Dunnington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a standardized vascular clinic (SVC) in teaching diagnostic and management skills for common vascular problems, as compared with that of the traditional ambulatory setting. Methods: Third-year medical students participating in the required surgical clerkship participated in this study. Students were randomly assigned to attend either a 4-hour SVC experience (group 1, n = 64) or a 4-hour traditional ambulatory experience (group 2, n = 60). Students completed a satisfaction rating scale and a preencounter and postencounter self-efficacy rating scale at the end of the experience. Student t tests were used to compare the groups in the areas of knowledge acquisition, problem solving, clinical skills and satisfaction with the encounter. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the change between pre and post self-efficacy ratings. Results: Students in group 1 performed significantly higher than students in group 2 in the areas of problem solving, clinical skills, and student satisfaction. They also demonstrated a higher level of confidence in their vascular skills than students assigned to the traditional setting. Conclusion: The SVC may be more effective in teaching problem-solving and clinical skills. It also may promote more student satisfaction with the experience and confidence in clinical skills than the traditional ambulatory setting. Copyright (C) 2000 Excerpta Medica Inc.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-246
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume179
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Blood Vessels
Students
Clinical Competence
Self Efficacy
Teaching
Medical Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The standardized vascular clinic : An alternative to the traditional ambulatory setting. / Sullivan, Maura E.; Ault, Glenn T.; Hood, Douglas B.; Chalabian, Jeanine R.; Pripstein, Jeremy; Jabbour, Nicolas; Dunnington, Gary.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 179, No. 3, 03.2000, p. 243-246.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sullivan, ME, Ault, GT, Hood, DB, Chalabian, JR, Pripstein, J, Jabbour, N & Dunnington, G 2000, 'The standardized vascular clinic: An alternative to the traditional ambulatory setting', American Journal of Surgery, vol. 179, no. 3, pp. 243-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00303-2
Sullivan, Maura E. ; Ault, Glenn T. ; Hood, Douglas B. ; Chalabian, Jeanine R. ; Pripstein, Jeremy ; Jabbour, Nicolas ; Dunnington, Gary. / The standardized vascular clinic : An alternative to the traditional ambulatory setting. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2000 ; Vol. 179, No. 3. pp. 243-246.
@article{980fbb610b9f45ae9acab262b4060081,
title = "The standardized vascular clinic: An alternative to the traditional ambulatory setting",
abstract = "Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a standardized vascular clinic (SVC) in teaching diagnostic and management skills for common vascular problems, as compared with that of the traditional ambulatory setting. Methods: Third-year medical students participating in the required surgical clerkship participated in this study. Students were randomly assigned to attend either a 4-hour SVC experience (group 1, n = 64) or a 4-hour traditional ambulatory experience (group 2, n = 60). Students completed a satisfaction rating scale and a preencounter and postencounter self-efficacy rating scale at the end of the experience. Student t tests were used to compare the groups in the areas of knowledge acquisition, problem solving, clinical skills and satisfaction with the encounter. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the change between pre and post self-efficacy ratings. Results: Students in group 1 performed significantly higher than students in group 2 in the areas of problem solving, clinical skills, and student satisfaction. They also demonstrated a higher level of confidence in their vascular skills than students assigned to the traditional setting. Conclusion: The SVC may be more effective in teaching problem-solving and clinical skills. It also may promote more student satisfaction with the experience and confidence in clinical skills than the traditional ambulatory setting. Copyright (C) 2000 Excerpta Medica Inc.",
author = "Sullivan, {Maura E.} and Ault, {Glenn T.} and Hood, {Douglas B.} and Chalabian, {Jeanine R.} and Jeremy Pripstein and Nicolas Jabbour and Gary Dunnington",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00303-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "179",
pages = "243--246",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The standardized vascular clinic

T2 - An alternative to the traditional ambulatory setting

AU - Sullivan, Maura E.

AU - Ault, Glenn T.

AU - Hood, Douglas B.

AU - Chalabian, Jeanine R.

AU - Pripstein, Jeremy

AU - Jabbour, Nicolas

AU - Dunnington, Gary

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a standardized vascular clinic (SVC) in teaching diagnostic and management skills for common vascular problems, as compared with that of the traditional ambulatory setting. Methods: Third-year medical students participating in the required surgical clerkship participated in this study. Students were randomly assigned to attend either a 4-hour SVC experience (group 1, n = 64) or a 4-hour traditional ambulatory experience (group 2, n = 60). Students completed a satisfaction rating scale and a preencounter and postencounter self-efficacy rating scale at the end of the experience. Student t tests were used to compare the groups in the areas of knowledge acquisition, problem solving, clinical skills and satisfaction with the encounter. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the change between pre and post self-efficacy ratings. Results: Students in group 1 performed significantly higher than students in group 2 in the areas of problem solving, clinical skills, and student satisfaction. They also demonstrated a higher level of confidence in their vascular skills than students assigned to the traditional setting. Conclusion: The SVC may be more effective in teaching problem-solving and clinical skills. It also may promote more student satisfaction with the experience and confidence in clinical skills than the traditional ambulatory setting. Copyright (C) 2000 Excerpta Medica Inc.

AB - Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of a standardized vascular clinic (SVC) in teaching diagnostic and management skills for common vascular problems, as compared with that of the traditional ambulatory setting. Methods: Third-year medical students participating in the required surgical clerkship participated in this study. Students were randomly assigned to attend either a 4-hour SVC experience (group 1, n = 64) or a 4-hour traditional ambulatory experience (group 2, n = 60). Students completed a satisfaction rating scale and a preencounter and postencounter self-efficacy rating scale at the end of the experience. Student t tests were used to compare the groups in the areas of knowledge acquisition, problem solving, clinical skills and satisfaction with the encounter. Analysis of covariance was used to compare the change between pre and post self-efficacy ratings. Results: Students in group 1 performed significantly higher than students in group 2 in the areas of problem solving, clinical skills, and student satisfaction. They also demonstrated a higher level of confidence in their vascular skills than students assigned to the traditional setting. Conclusion: The SVC may be more effective in teaching problem-solving and clinical skills. It also may promote more student satisfaction with the experience and confidence in clinical skills than the traditional ambulatory setting. Copyright (C) 2000 Excerpta Medica Inc.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034023513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034023513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00303-2

DO - 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00303-2

M3 - Article

VL - 179

SP - 243

EP - 246

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 3

ER -