The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: A retrospective study

Kevin H. Ludwig, Margherita Fontana, LaQuia Vinson, Jeffrey Platt, Jeffrey A. Dean

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) used to restore primary molars with caries lesions, placed by means of both the traditional technique (involving complete caries removal and tooth reduction before placement of the SSC) and the Hall technique (involving no caries removal, no crown preparation and no use of local anesthetic before placement of the SSC).

Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective chart review by using the patient records at a private pediatric dental practice at which the Hall technique had been introduced in June 2010 as an alternative treatment to traditional SSC placement. The inclusion criteria were caries lesions on a primary molar with no clinical or radiographic evidence of pulpitis, necrosis or abscess, as well as follow-up of at least six months or until failure, whichever came first. They graded restoration success by using a four-point scale based on presence or loss of the SSC, and whether or not the patient needed further treatment associated with pulpal pathology or secondary caries. They collected and summarized patient demographic information. They used a Kaplan-Meier survival curve along with 95 percent confidence intervals to evaluate clinical success.

Results. The authors found that 65 (97 percent) of 67 SSCs placed with the Hall technique (mean observation time, 15 months; range, four-37 months) and 110 (94 percent) of 117 SSCs placed with the traditional technique (mean observation time, 53 months; range, four-119 months) were successful.

Conclusion. Findings of this study show a similar success rate for SSCs placed with the traditional technique or the Hall technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1248-1253
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume145
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Stainless Steel
Crowns
Retrospective Studies
Tooth
Pulpitis
Observation
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Local Anesthetics
Abscess
Necrosis
Demography
Confidence Intervals
Pediatrics
Pathology
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Caries
  • Caries lesions
  • Crowns
  • Dental care for children
  • Dental cavity preparation
  • Dental restoration
  • Dental restoration failure
  • Pediatric dentistry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique : A retrospective study. / Ludwig, Kevin H.; Fontana, Margherita; Vinson, LaQuia; Platt, Jeffrey; Dean, Jeffrey A.

In: Journal of the American Dental Association, Vol. 145, No. 12, 01.12.2014, p. 1248-1253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed0d1f0f71344406a4121cf9caeea64f,
title = "The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: A retrospective study",
abstract = "Background. In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) used to restore primary molars with caries lesions, placed by means of both the traditional technique (involving complete caries removal and tooth reduction before placement of the SSC) and the Hall technique (involving no caries removal, no crown preparation and no use of local anesthetic before placement of the SSC).Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective chart review by using the patient records at a private pediatric dental practice at which the Hall technique had been introduced in June 2010 as an alternative treatment to traditional SSC placement. The inclusion criteria were caries lesions on a primary molar with no clinical or radiographic evidence of pulpitis, necrosis or abscess, as well as follow-up of at least six months or until failure, whichever came first. They graded restoration success by using a four-point scale based on presence or loss of the SSC, and whether or not the patient needed further treatment associated with pulpal pathology or secondary caries. They collected and summarized patient demographic information. They used a Kaplan-Meier survival curve along with 95 percent confidence intervals to evaluate clinical success.Results. The authors found that 65 (97 percent) of 67 SSCs placed with the Hall technique (mean observation time, 15 months; range, four-37 months) and 110 (94 percent) of 117 SSCs placed with the traditional technique (mean observation time, 53 months; range, four-119 months) were successful.Conclusion. Findings of this study show a similar success rate for SSCs placed with the traditional technique or the Hall technique.",
keywords = "Caries, Caries lesions, Crowns, Dental care for children, Dental cavity preparation, Dental restoration, Dental restoration failure, Pediatric dentistry",
author = "Ludwig, {Kevin H.} and Margherita Fontana and LaQuia Vinson and Jeffrey Platt and Dean, {Jeffrey A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.14219/jada.2014.89",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "145",
pages = "1248--1253",
journal = "Journal of the American Dental Association",
issn = "0002-8177",
publisher = "American Dental Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique

T2 - A retrospective study

AU - Ludwig, Kevin H.

AU - Fontana, Margherita

AU - Vinson, LaQuia

AU - Platt, Jeffrey

AU - Dean, Jeffrey A.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Background. In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) used to restore primary molars with caries lesions, placed by means of both the traditional technique (involving complete caries removal and tooth reduction before placement of the SSC) and the Hall technique (involving no caries removal, no crown preparation and no use of local anesthetic before placement of the SSC).Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective chart review by using the patient records at a private pediatric dental practice at which the Hall technique had been introduced in June 2010 as an alternative treatment to traditional SSC placement. The inclusion criteria were caries lesions on a primary molar with no clinical or radiographic evidence of pulpitis, necrosis or abscess, as well as follow-up of at least six months or until failure, whichever came first. They graded restoration success by using a four-point scale based on presence or loss of the SSC, and whether or not the patient needed further treatment associated with pulpal pathology or secondary caries. They collected and summarized patient demographic information. They used a Kaplan-Meier survival curve along with 95 percent confidence intervals to evaluate clinical success.Results. The authors found that 65 (97 percent) of 67 SSCs placed with the Hall technique (mean observation time, 15 months; range, four-37 months) and 110 (94 percent) of 117 SSCs placed with the traditional technique (mean observation time, 53 months; range, four-119 months) were successful.Conclusion. Findings of this study show a similar success rate for SSCs placed with the traditional technique or the Hall technique.

AB - Background. In this retrospective study, the authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic success of stainless steel crowns (SSCs) used to restore primary molars with caries lesions, placed by means of both the traditional technique (involving complete caries removal and tooth reduction before placement of the SSC) and the Hall technique (involving no caries removal, no crown preparation and no use of local anesthetic before placement of the SSC).Methods. The authors conducted a retrospective chart review by using the patient records at a private pediatric dental practice at which the Hall technique had been introduced in June 2010 as an alternative treatment to traditional SSC placement. The inclusion criteria were caries lesions on a primary molar with no clinical or radiographic evidence of pulpitis, necrosis or abscess, as well as follow-up of at least six months or until failure, whichever came first. They graded restoration success by using a four-point scale based on presence or loss of the SSC, and whether or not the patient needed further treatment associated with pulpal pathology or secondary caries. They collected and summarized patient demographic information. They used a Kaplan-Meier survival curve along with 95 percent confidence intervals to evaluate clinical success.Results. The authors found that 65 (97 percent) of 67 SSCs placed with the Hall technique (mean observation time, 15 months; range, four-37 months) and 110 (94 percent) of 117 SSCs placed with the traditional technique (mean observation time, 53 months; range, four-119 months) were successful.Conclusion. Findings of this study show a similar success rate for SSCs placed with the traditional technique or the Hall technique.

KW - Caries

KW - Caries lesions

KW - Crowns

KW - Dental care for children

KW - Dental cavity preparation

KW - Dental restoration

KW - Dental restoration failure

KW - Pediatric dentistry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84913615937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84913615937&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.14219/jada.2014.89

DO - 10.14219/jada.2014.89

M3 - Article

C2 - 25429038

AN - SCOPUS:84913615937

VL - 145

SP - 1248

EP - 1253

JO - Journal of the American Dental Association

JF - Journal of the American Dental Association

SN - 0002-8177

IS - 12

ER -