The Teacher and Learner Interactive Assessment System (TeLIAS): A New Tool to Assess Teaching Behaviors in the Ambulatory Setting

Jeffrey L. Jackson, Patrick G. O'Malley, Stephen M. Salerno, Kurt Kroenke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There are no objective tools to assess ambulatory teaching, an increasingly important component of medical education. Purpose: To develop and describe an objective ambulatory teaching tool. Methods: Exactly 30 consecutive ambulatory teaching encounters were audio taped. Audio tapes were transcribed and teacher-learner utterances were qualitatively analyzed by 3 coders using a grounded theory approach. Results: A total of 4,560 utterances were coded: 1/3 were devoted to case presentations, and the remainder to case discussion. Most learner utterances conveyed factual patient information; only 7% conveyed learner thoughts on diagnosis or management. Attending utterances were equally divided between questions, statements of fact, and management statements. Most attending questions (75%) asked patient or medical facts; few were of a higher-level asking learners to analyze, synthesize, or apply content. Feedback, although common (10%), consisted of mostly minimal statements such as "right" or "1 agree." At the bedside, 80% of utterances were by the teacher. Conclusions: This is a feasible tool that reliably documents ambulatory teacher and learner behaviors and may be useful for educational research and faculty development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)249-256
Number of pages8
JournalTeaching and Learning in Medicine
Volume14
Issue number4
StatePublished - Sep 2002

Fingerprint

Teaching
teacher
Medical Education
educational research
management
grounded theory
Research
education
Grounded Theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

The Teacher and Learner Interactive Assessment System (TeLIAS) : A New Tool to Assess Teaching Behaviors in the Ambulatory Setting. / Jackson, Jeffrey L.; O'Malley, Patrick G.; Salerno, Stephen M.; Kroenke, Kurt.

In: Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 4, 09.2002, p. 249-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{16cad534c57342668b9853ca8d146ce1,
title = "The Teacher and Learner Interactive Assessment System (TeLIAS): A New Tool to Assess Teaching Behaviors in the Ambulatory Setting",
abstract = "Background: There are no objective tools to assess ambulatory teaching, an increasingly important component of medical education. Purpose: To develop and describe an objective ambulatory teaching tool. Methods: Exactly 30 consecutive ambulatory teaching encounters were audio taped. Audio tapes were transcribed and teacher-learner utterances were qualitatively analyzed by 3 coders using a grounded theory approach. Results: A total of 4,560 utterances were coded: 1/3 were devoted to case presentations, and the remainder to case discussion. Most learner utterances conveyed factual patient information; only 7{\%} conveyed learner thoughts on diagnosis or management. Attending utterances were equally divided between questions, statements of fact, and management statements. Most attending questions (75{\%}) asked patient or medical facts; few were of a higher-level asking learners to analyze, synthesize, or apply content. Feedback, although common (10{\%}), consisted of mostly minimal statements such as {"}right{"} or {"}1 agree.{"} At the bedside, 80{\%} of utterances were by the teacher. Conclusions: This is a feasible tool that reliably documents ambulatory teacher and learner behaviors and may be useful for educational research and faculty development.",
author = "Jackson, {Jeffrey L.} and O'Malley, {Patrick G.} and Salerno, {Stephen M.} and Kurt Kroenke",
year = "2002",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "249--256",
journal = "Teaching and Learning in Medicine",
issn = "1040-1334",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Teacher and Learner Interactive Assessment System (TeLIAS)

T2 - A New Tool to Assess Teaching Behaviors in the Ambulatory Setting

AU - Jackson, Jeffrey L.

AU - O'Malley, Patrick G.

AU - Salerno, Stephen M.

AU - Kroenke, Kurt

PY - 2002/9

Y1 - 2002/9

N2 - Background: There are no objective tools to assess ambulatory teaching, an increasingly important component of medical education. Purpose: To develop and describe an objective ambulatory teaching tool. Methods: Exactly 30 consecutive ambulatory teaching encounters were audio taped. Audio tapes were transcribed and teacher-learner utterances were qualitatively analyzed by 3 coders using a grounded theory approach. Results: A total of 4,560 utterances were coded: 1/3 were devoted to case presentations, and the remainder to case discussion. Most learner utterances conveyed factual patient information; only 7% conveyed learner thoughts on diagnosis or management. Attending utterances were equally divided between questions, statements of fact, and management statements. Most attending questions (75%) asked patient or medical facts; few were of a higher-level asking learners to analyze, synthesize, or apply content. Feedback, although common (10%), consisted of mostly minimal statements such as "right" or "1 agree." At the bedside, 80% of utterances were by the teacher. Conclusions: This is a feasible tool that reliably documents ambulatory teacher and learner behaviors and may be useful for educational research and faculty development.

AB - Background: There are no objective tools to assess ambulatory teaching, an increasingly important component of medical education. Purpose: To develop and describe an objective ambulatory teaching tool. Methods: Exactly 30 consecutive ambulatory teaching encounters were audio taped. Audio tapes were transcribed and teacher-learner utterances were qualitatively analyzed by 3 coders using a grounded theory approach. Results: A total of 4,560 utterances were coded: 1/3 were devoted to case presentations, and the remainder to case discussion. Most learner utterances conveyed factual patient information; only 7% conveyed learner thoughts on diagnosis or management. Attending utterances were equally divided between questions, statements of fact, and management statements. Most attending questions (75%) asked patient or medical facts; few were of a higher-level asking learners to analyze, synthesize, or apply content. Feedback, although common (10%), consisted of mostly minimal statements such as "right" or "1 agree." At the bedside, 80% of utterances were by the teacher. Conclusions: This is a feasible tool that reliably documents ambulatory teacher and learner behaviors and may be useful for educational research and faculty development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036728837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036728837&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12395488

AN - SCOPUS:0036728837

VL - 14

SP - 249

EP - 256

JO - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

JF - Teaching and Learning in Medicine

SN - 1040-1334

IS - 4

ER -