The Underuse of Carotid Interventions in Veterans with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

Salomeh Keyhani, Eric Cheng, Susan Ofner, Linda Williams, Dawn Bravata

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the receipt of carotid intervention among eligible patients post stroke in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: We examined whether veterans admitted to a VA medical center in 2007 with a diagnosis of stroke and who were eligible for intervention, received carotid intervention in a period up to 6 months after their index hospitalization. We also examined whether demographics, comorbid conditions, stroke severity and availability of vascular intervention services were independently associated with receipt of intervention. Results: Among the 5721 patients admitted, 253 ischemic stroke patients had evidence of some carotid stenosis and had data on side of stroke available. Among the 200 patients who had at least 50% to 99% stenosis of the carotid artery, 34 (17%) received intervention (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.79%-22.21%). In a multivariable model, black race and past history of diabetes were significantly associated with carotid intervention: An eligible black patient was 6 times more likely to NOT receive intervention compared to patients of other races (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 6.54; 95% CI, 1.34-31.9), and a patient with diabetes was 3 times more likely to NOT receive intervention (adjusted OR = 3.38; 95% CI, 1.24-9.24) compared to nondiabetics. Stroke severity and availability of vascular surgery services was not associated with receipt of intervention. Conclusions: Few patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who were admitted with stroke to the VA received carotid intervention. Future research should be directed at improving access to this procedure among eligible patients in the VA.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAmerican Journal of Managed Care
Volume20
Issue number7
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Carotid Stenosis
Veterans
Veterans Health
Stroke
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Confidence Intervals
Blood Vessels
Odds Ratio
Hospitalization
Demography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

The Underuse of Carotid Interventions in Veterans with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. / Keyhani, Salomeh; Cheng, Eric; Ofner, Susan; Williams, Linda; Bravata, Dawn.

In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 20, No. 7, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7d3c00180b7d4cc38062654c42027751,
title = "The Underuse of Carotid Interventions in Veterans with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine the receipt of carotid intervention among eligible patients post stroke in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: We examined whether veterans admitted to a VA medical center in 2007 with a diagnosis of stroke and who were eligible for intervention, received carotid intervention in a period up to 6 months after their index hospitalization. We also examined whether demographics, comorbid conditions, stroke severity and availability of vascular intervention services were independently associated with receipt of intervention. Results: Among the 5721 patients admitted, 253 ischemic stroke patients had evidence of some carotid stenosis and had data on side of stroke available. Among the 200 patients who had at least 50{\%} to 99{\%} stenosis of the carotid artery, 34 (17{\%}) received intervention (95{\%} confidence interval [CI], 11.79{\%}-22.21{\%}). In a multivariable model, black race and past history of diabetes were significantly associated with carotid intervention: An eligible black patient was 6 times more likely to NOT receive intervention compared to patients of other races (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 6.54; 95{\%} CI, 1.34-31.9), and a patient with diabetes was 3 times more likely to NOT receive intervention (adjusted OR = 3.38; 95{\%} CI, 1.24-9.24) compared to nondiabetics. Stroke severity and availability of vascular surgery services was not associated with receipt of intervention. Conclusions: Few patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who were admitted with stroke to the VA received carotid intervention. Future research should be directed at improving access to this procedure among eligible patients in the VA.",
author = "Salomeh Keyhani and Eric Cheng and Susan Ofner and Linda Williams and Dawn Bravata",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "American Journal of Managed Care",
issn = "1088-0224",
publisher = "Ascend Media",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Underuse of Carotid Interventions in Veterans with Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis

AU - Keyhani, Salomeh

AU - Cheng, Eric

AU - Ofner, Susan

AU - Williams, Linda

AU - Bravata, Dawn

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Objectives: To examine the receipt of carotid intervention among eligible patients post stroke in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: We examined whether veterans admitted to a VA medical center in 2007 with a diagnosis of stroke and who were eligible for intervention, received carotid intervention in a period up to 6 months after their index hospitalization. We also examined whether demographics, comorbid conditions, stroke severity and availability of vascular intervention services were independently associated with receipt of intervention. Results: Among the 5721 patients admitted, 253 ischemic stroke patients had evidence of some carotid stenosis and had data on side of stroke available. Among the 200 patients who had at least 50% to 99% stenosis of the carotid artery, 34 (17%) received intervention (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.79%-22.21%). In a multivariable model, black race and past history of diabetes were significantly associated with carotid intervention: An eligible black patient was 6 times more likely to NOT receive intervention compared to patients of other races (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 6.54; 95% CI, 1.34-31.9), and a patient with diabetes was 3 times more likely to NOT receive intervention (adjusted OR = 3.38; 95% CI, 1.24-9.24) compared to nondiabetics. Stroke severity and availability of vascular surgery services was not associated with receipt of intervention. Conclusions: Few patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who were admitted with stroke to the VA received carotid intervention. Future research should be directed at improving access to this procedure among eligible patients in the VA.

AB - Objectives: To examine the receipt of carotid intervention among eligible patients post stroke in the Veterans Health Administration (VA). Methods: We examined whether veterans admitted to a VA medical center in 2007 with a diagnosis of stroke and who were eligible for intervention, received carotid intervention in a period up to 6 months after their index hospitalization. We also examined whether demographics, comorbid conditions, stroke severity and availability of vascular intervention services were independently associated with receipt of intervention. Results: Among the 5721 patients admitted, 253 ischemic stroke patients had evidence of some carotid stenosis and had data on side of stroke available. Among the 200 patients who had at least 50% to 99% stenosis of the carotid artery, 34 (17%) received intervention (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.79%-22.21%). In a multivariable model, black race and past history of diabetes were significantly associated with carotid intervention: An eligible black patient was 6 times more likely to NOT receive intervention compared to patients of other races (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 6.54; 95% CI, 1.34-31.9), and a patient with diabetes was 3 times more likely to NOT receive intervention (adjusted OR = 3.38; 95% CI, 1.24-9.24) compared to nondiabetics. Stroke severity and availability of vascular surgery services was not associated with receipt of intervention. Conclusions: Few patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who were admitted with stroke to the VA received carotid intervention. Future research should be directed at improving access to this procedure among eligible patients in the VA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905057641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905057641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - American Journal of Managed Care

JF - American Journal of Managed Care

SN - 1088-0224

IS - 7

ER -