The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research

Susan Perkins, Wanzhu Tu, Michael G. Underhill, Xiao Hua Zhou, Michael Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

92 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - To describe the application of propensity score analysis in pharmacoepidemiologic research using a study comparing the renal effects of two commonly prescribed non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Method - Observational data were collected on the change in renal function, as measured by serum creatinine concentration, before and after use of two NSAIDs, Ibuprofen and Sulindac. To estimate the treatment effect of the different NSAIDs, we used the propensity score methodology to reduce the potential confounding effects caused by unbalanced covariates. After estimating the propensity scores (the probabilities of each patient being prescribed Sulindac) from a logistic regression model, we stratified the data based on sample quintiles of the propensity score distribution. The final estimate of the treatment effect was then obtained by averaging the treatment estimates from the stratified samples. Results - Initially, 23 covariates differed significantly between the two treatment groups. Using the propensity score methodology, we were able to balance the distributions of 16 covariates. The imbalances in the remaining seven covariates were also greatly reduced. Although the use of either drug resulted in a decrease in renal function, overall differences between them were not statistically significant with respect to their effect on creatinine concentrations based on the propensity score analysis. Conclusion - Observational studies often produce treatment groups that are not directly comparable due to imbalances in covariate distributions between the treatment groups. Propensity score analysis provides a simple and effective way of controlling the effects of these covariates and obtaining a less biased estimate of the treatment effect. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)93-101
Number of pages9
JournalPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Volume9
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2000

Fingerprint

Propensity Score
Research
Sulindac
Anti-Inflammatory Agents
Kidney
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Therapeutics
Creatinine
Logistic Models
Ibuprofen
Observational Studies
Serum

Keywords

  • NSAIDs
  • Observational studies
  • Propensity scores
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Subclassification
  • Treatment bias

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research. / Perkins, Susan; Tu, Wanzhu; Underhill, Michael G.; Zhou, Xiao Hua; Murray, Michael.

In: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 9, No. 2, 03.2000, p. 93-101.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1afd90b295fa476796dd841686868a1c,
title = "The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research",
abstract = "Purpose - To describe the application of propensity score analysis in pharmacoepidemiologic research using a study comparing the renal effects of two commonly prescribed non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Method - Observational data were collected on the change in renal function, as measured by serum creatinine concentration, before and after use of two NSAIDs, Ibuprofen and Sulindac. To estimate the treatment effect of the different NSAIDs, we used the propensity score methodology to reduce the potential confounding effects caused by unbalanced covariates. After estimating the propensity scores (the probabilities of each patient being prescribed Sulindac) from a logistic regression model, we stratified the data based on sample quintiles of the propensity score distribution. The final estimate of the treatment effect was then obtained by averaging the treatment estimates from the stratified samples. Results - Initially, 23 covariates differed significantly between the two treatment groups. Using the propensity score methodology, we were able to balance the distributions of 16 covariates. The imbalances in the remaining seven covariates were also greatly reduced. Although the use of either drug resulted in a decrease in renal function, overall differences between them were not statistically significant with respect to their effect on creatinine concentrations based on the propensity score analysis. Conclusion - Observational studies often produce treatment groups that are not directly comparable due to imbalances in covariate distributions between the treatment groups. Propensity score analysis provides a simple and effective way of controlling the effects of these covariates and obtaining a less biased estimate of the treatment effect. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.",
keywords = "NSAIDs, Observational studies, Propensity scores, Renal insufficiency, Subclassification, Treatment bias",
author = "Susan Perkins and Wanzhu Tu and Underhill, {Michael G.} and Zhou, {Xiao Hua} and Michael Murray",
year = "2000",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "93--101",
journal = "Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety",
issn = "1053-8569",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of propensity scores in pharmacoepidemiologic research

AU - Perkins, Susan

AU - Tu, Wanzhu

AU - Underhill, Michael G.

AU - Zhou, Xiao Hua

AU - Murray, Michael

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - Purpose - To describe the application of propensity score analysis in pharmacoepidemiologic research using a study comparing the renal effects of two commonly prescribed non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Method - Observational data were collected on the change in renal function, as measured by serum creatinine concentration, before and after use of two NSAIDs, Ibuprofen and Sulindac. To estimate the treatment effect of the different NSAIDs, we used the propensity score methodology to reduce the potential confounding effects caused by unbalanced covariates. After estimating the propensity scores (the probabilities of each patient being prescribed Sulindac) from a logistic regression model, we stratified the data based on sample quintiles of the propensity score distribution. The final estimate of the treatment effect was then obtained by averaging the treatment estimates from the stratified samples. Results - Initially, 23 covariates differed significantly between the two treatment groups. Using the propensity score methodology, we were able to balance the distributions of 16 covariates. The imbalances in the remaining seven covariates were also greatly reduced. Although the use of either drug resulted in a decrease in renal function, overall differences between them were not statistically significant with respect to their effect on creatinine concentrations based on the propensity score analysis. Conclusion - Observational studies often produce treatment groups that are not directly comparable due to imbalances in covariate distributions between the treatment groups. Propensity score analysis provides a simple and effective way of controlling the effects of these covariates and obtaining a less biased estimate of the treatment effect. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

AB - Purpose - To describe the application of propensity score analysis in pharmacoepidemiologic research using a study comparing the renal effects of two commonly prescribed non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Method - Observational data were collected on the change in renal function, as measured by serum creatinine concentration, before and after use of two NSAIDs, Ibuprofen and Sulindac. To estimate the treatment effect of the different NSAIDs, we used the propensity score methodology to reduce the potential confounding effects caused by unbalanced covariates. After estimating the propensity scores (the probabilities of each patient being prescribed Sulindac) from a logistic regression model, we stratified the data based on sample quintiles of the propensity score distribution. The final estimate of the treatment effect was then obtained by averaging the treatment estimates from the stratified samples. Results - Initially, 23 covariates differed significantly between the two treatment groups. Using the propensity score methodology, we were able to balance the distributions of 16 covariates. The imbalances in the remaining seven covariates were also greatly reduced. Although the use of either drug resulted in a decrease in renal function, overall differences between them were not statistically significant with respect to their effect on creatinine concentrations based on the propensity score analysis. Conclusion - Observational studies often produce treatment groups that are not directly comparable due to imbalances in covariate distributions between the treatment groups. Propensity score analysis provides a simple and effective way of controlling the effects of these covariates and obtaining a less biased estimate of the treatment effect. Copyright (C) 2000 John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

KW - NSAIDs

KW - Observational studies

KW - Propensity scores

KW - Renal insufficiency

KW - Subclassification

KW - Treatment bias

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034069113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034069113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 93

EP - 101

JO - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

JF - Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety

SN - 1053-8569

IS - 2

ER -