The use of segmental anatomy for an operative classification of liver injuries

K. J. Buechter, R. Zeppa, G. Gomez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is no universally accepted standard classification for liver injuries, and thus accurate comparison of reports on the subject is impossible. Most published reports on liver trauma suggest that both morbidity and mortality have a linear correlation with not only the amount of liver parenchyma injured but also with the magnitude of the surgical intervention. The exceptions are retrohepatic vein injuries, which have a mortality independent of associated parenchymal injury should be integrated in any classification of liver injury. The classification proposed is based on the segmental anatomy of the liver (as defined by Couinaud): Grade I - Injuries requiring no operative intervention, or any injury that requires operative intervention limited to a segment or less. Grade II - Any injury that requires operative intervention involving two or more segments. Grade III - Any injury with an associated juxta- or retrohepatic vein injury. We reviewed all patients with isolated liver injuries during the past 5 years and prospectively reviewed all patients for the 6-month period from January to June 1988 and applied this classification. Sixty-nine patients had grade I injuries, with one death (1%); thirteen patients had grade II injuries, with six deaths (46%); and 13 patients had grade III injuries with nine deaths (69%). Postoperative morbidity was 7% for grade I, 57% for grade II, and 50% for grade III. This study supports the conclusion that morbidity and mortality from liver injury are directly related to the volume of parenchyma involved, and that segmental anatomy can be applied to define this volume. Mortality from retrohepatic vein injuries is independent of associated parenchymal injury. We believe that this proposed classification will provide a simple, reproducible, and accurate means for reporting and comparing liver injuries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)669-675
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume211
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

Anatomy
Liver
Wounds and Injuries
Veins
Mortality
Morbidity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

The use of segmental anatomy for an operative classification of liver injuries. / Buechter, K. J.; Zeppa, R.; Gomez, G.

In: Annals of surgery, Vol. 211, No. 6, 01.01.1990, p. 669-675.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Buechter, K. J. ; Zeppa, R. ; Gomez, G. / The use of segmental anatomy for an operative classification of liver injuries. In: Annals of surgery. 1990 ; Vol. 211, No. 6. pp. 669-675.
@article{a72cce45166f472f8215ff6952a42b38,
title = "The use of segmental anatomy for an operative classification of liver injuries",
abstract = "There is no universally accepted standard classification for liver injuries, and thus accurate comparison of reports on the subject is impossible. Most published reports on liver trauma suggest that both morbidity and mortality have a linear correlation with not only the amount of liver parenchyma injured but also with the magnitude of the surgical intervention. The exceptions are retrohepatic vein injuries, which have a mortality independent of associated parenchymal injury should be integrated in any classification of liver injury. The classification proposed is based on the segmental anatomy of the liver (as defined by Couinaud): Grade I - Injuries requiring no operative intervention, or any injury that requires operative intervention limited to a segment or less. Grade II - Any injury that requires operative intervention involving two or more segments. Grade III - Any injury with an associated juxta- or retrohepatic vein injury. We reviewed all patients with isolated liver injuries during the past 5 years and prospectively reviewed all patients for the 6-month period from January to June 1988 and applied this classification. Sixty-nine patients had grade I injuries, with one death (1{\%}); thirteen patients had grade II injuries, with six deaths (46{\%}); and 13 patients had grade III injuries with nine deaths (69{\%}). Postoperative morbidity was 7{\%} for grade I, 57{\%} for grade II, and 50{\%} for grade III. This study supports the conclusion that morbidity and mortality from liver injury are directly related to the volume of parenchyma involved, and that segmental anatomy can be applied to define this volume. Mortality from retrohepatic vein injuries is independent of associated parenchymal injury. We believe that this proposed classification will provide a simple, reproducible, and accurate means for reporting and comparing liver injuries.",
author = "Buechter, {K. J.} and R. Zeppa and G. Gomez",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/00000658-199006000-00004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "211",
pages = "669--675",
journal = "Annals of Surgery",
issn = "0003-4932",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The use of segmental anatomy for an operative classification of liver injuries

AU - Buechter, K. J.

AU - Zeppa, R.

AU - Gomez, G.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - There is no universally accepted standard classification for liver injuries, and thus accurate comparison of reports on the subject is impossible. Most published reports on liver trauma suggest that both morbidity and mortality have a linear correlation with not only the amount of liver parenchyma injured but also with the magnitude of the surgical intervention. The exceptions are retrohepatic vein injuries, which have a mortality independent of associated parenchymal injury should be integrated in any classification of liver injury. The classification proposed is based on the segmental anatomy of the liver (as defined by Couinaud): Grade I - Injuries requiring no operative intervention, or any injury that requires operative intervention limited to a segment or less. Grade II - Any injury that requires operative intervention involving two or more segments. Grade III - Any injury with an associated juxta- or retrohepatic vein injury. We reviewed all patients with isolated liver injuries during the past 5 years and prospectively reviewed all patients for the 6-month period from January to June 1988 and applied this classification. Sixty-nine patients had grade I injuries, with one death (1%); thirteen patients had grade II injuries, with six deaths (46%); and 13 patients had grade III injuries with nine deaths (69%). Postoperative morbidity was 7% for grade I, 57% for grade II, and 50% for grade III. This study supports the conclusion that morbidity and mortality from liver injury are directly related to the volume of parenchyma involved, and that segmental anatomy can be applied to define this volume. Mortality from retrohepatic vein injuries is independent of associated parenchymal injury. We believe that this proposed classification will provide a simple, reproducible, and accurate means for reporting and comparing liver injuries.

AB - There is no universally accepted standard classification for liver injuries, and thus accurate comparison of reports on the subject is impossible. Most published reports on liver trauma suggest that both morbidity and mortality have a linear correlation with not only the amount of liver parenchyma injured but also with the magnitude of the surgical intervention. The exceptions are retrohepatic vein injuries, which have a mortality independent of associated parenchymal injury should be integrated in any classification of liver injury. The classification proposed is based on the segmental anatomy of the liver (as defined by Couinaud): Grade I - Injuries requiring no operative intervention, or any injury that requires operative intervention limited to a segment or less. Grade II - Any injury that requires operative intervention involving two or more segments. Grade III - Any injury with an associated juxta- or retrohepatic vein injury. We reviewed all patients with isolated liver injuries during the past 5 years and prospectively reviewed all patients for the 6-month period from January to June 1988 and applied this classification. Sixty-nine patients had grade I injuries, with one death (1%); thirteen patients had grade II injuries, with six deaths (46%); and 13 patients had grade III injuries with nine deaths (69%). Postoperative morbidity was 7% for grade I, 57% for grade II, and 50% for grade III. This study supports the conclusion that morbidity and mortality from liver injury are directly related to the volume of parenchyma involved, and that segmental anatomy can be applied to define this volume. Mortality from retrohepatic vein injuries is independent of associated parenchymal injury. We believe that this proposed classification will provide a simple, reproducible, and accurate means for reporting and comparing liver injuries.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025352328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025352328&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/00000658-199006000-00004

DO - 10.1097/00000658-199006000-00004

M3 - Article

C2 - 2357129

AN - SCOPUS:0025352328

VL - 211

SP - 669

EP - 675

JO - Annals of Surgery

JF - Annals of Surgery

SN - 0003-4932

IS - 6

ER -