The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking

Eric M. Meslin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

With the domestic and international proliferation of biobanks and their associated connections to health information databases, scholarly attention has been turning from the ethical issues arising from the construction of biobanks to the ethical issues that emerge in their operation and management. Calls for greater transparency in governance structures, coupled with stern reminders of the value of maintaining public trust, are seen as critical components in the success of these resources. Two different approaches have been adopted for addressing these types of ethical issues: the first is a 'top-down' approach which focuses on developing policy, procedures, regulations and guidelines to aid decision-makers. The second is a 'bottom-up' approach, which begins with those who are most affected by the issues and attempts to inductively develop consensus recommendations and policy. While both approaches have merit, I argue that more work needs to be done on 'bottom-up' strategies if trust and transparency are to be more than mere slogans. Using 2 case examples from Indiana, the paper summarizes data from a set of surveys we recently conducted that address issues arising from biobanks that provide some insight into issues associated with trust and transparency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-214
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health Genomics
Volume13
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2010

Fingerprint

Ethics
Decision Support Techniques
Consensus
Databases
Guidelines
Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Datasets

Keywords

  • Biobanks
  • Ethics
  • Governance
  • Public trust
  • Transparency

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics(clinical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking. / Meslin, Eric M.

In: Public Health Genomics, Vol. 13, No. 4, 04.2010, p. 207-214.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{005f4263816947769c405ea4b328ef4f,
title = "The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking",
abstract = "With the domestic and international proliferation of biobanks and their associated connections to health information databases, scholarly attention has been turning from the ethical issues arising from the construction of biobanks to the ethical issues that emerge in their operation and management. Calls for greater transparency in governance structures, coupled with stern reminders of the value of maintaining public trust, are seen as critical components in the success of these resources. Two different approaches have been adopted for addressing these types of ethical issues: the first is a 'top-down' approach which focuses on developing policy, procedures, regulations and guidelines to aid decision-makers. The second is a 'bottom-up' approach, which begins with those who are most affected by the issues and attempts to inductively develop consensus recommendations and policy. While both approaches have merit, I argue that more work needs to be done on 'bottom-up' strategies if trust and transparency are to be more than mere slogans. Using 2 case examples from Indiana, the paper summarizes data from a set of surveys we recently conducted that address issues arising from biobanks that provide some insight into issues associated with trust and transparency.",
keywords = "Biobanks, Ethics, Governance, Public trust, Transparency",
author = "Meslin, {Eric M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1159/000279622",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "207--214",
journal = "Public Health Genomics",
issn = "1662-4246",
publisher = "S. Karger AG",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value of using top-down and bottom-up approaches for building trust and transparency in biobanking

AU - Meslin, Eric M.

PY - 2010/4

Y1 - 2010/4

N2 - With the domestic and international proliferation of biobanks and their associated connections to health information databases, scholarly attention has been turning from the ethical issues arising from the construction of biobanks to the ethical issues that emerge in their operation and management. Calls for greater transparency in governance structures, coupled with stern reminders of the value of maintaining public trust, are seen as critical components in the success of these resources. Two different approaches have been adopted for addressing these types of ethical issues: the first is a 'top-down' approach which focuses on developing policy, procedures, regulations and guidelines to aid decision-makers. The second is a 'bottom-up' approach, which begins with those who are most affected by the issues and attempts to inductively develop consensus recommendations and policy. While both approaches have merit, I argue that more work needs to be done on 'bottom-up' strategies if trust and transparency are to be more than mere slogans. Using 2 case examples from Indiana, the paper summarizes data from a set of surveys we recently conducted that address issues arising from biobanks that provide some insight into issues associated with trust and transparency.

AB - With the domestic and international proliferation of biobanks and their associated connections to health information databases, scholarly attention has been turning from the ethical issues arising from the construction of biobanks to the ethical issues that emerge in their operation and management. Calls for greater transparency in governance structures, coupled with stern reminders of the value of maintaining public trust, are seen as critical components in the success of these resources. Two different approaches have been adopted for addressing these types of ethical issues: the first is a 'top-down' approach which focuses on developing policy, procedures, regulations and guidelines to aid decision-makers. The second is a 'bottom-up' approach, which begins with those who are most affected by the issues and attempts to inductively develop consensus recommendations and policy. While both approaches have merit, I argue that more work needs to be done on 'bottom-up' strategies if trust and transparency are to be more than mere slogans. Using 2 case examples from Indiana, the paper summarizes data from a set of surveys we recently conducted that address issues arising from biobanks that provide some insight into issues associated with trust and transparency.

KW - Biobanks

KW - Ethics

KW - Governance

KW - Public trust

KW - Transparency

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951468117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951468117&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1159/000279622

DO - 10.1159/000279622

M3 - Article

C2 - 20395689

AN - SCOPUS:77951468117

VL - 13

SP - 207

EP - 214

JO - Public Health Genomics

JF - Public Health Genomics

SN - 1662-4246

IS - 4

ER -