The view from two worlds

The convergence of social network reports between mental health clients and their ties

Bernice A. Pescosolido, Eric R. Wright

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    33 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Traditionally, concerns with the similarities and discrepancies between the reports of persons (or focal respondents) and their collaterals (or network ties/respondents) about the former's social support network is framed as a methodological concern. As individuals experience the devastating effects of illness, and especially as their cognitive capabilities or social perceptions may be impaired by mental health problems, these listings are seen as potentially problematic. While we share this concern, we expand the investigation of the comparison of network ties from focal and network respondents to consider the nature of differences. Using data from Wave I of the Indianapolis Network Mental Health Study, we target the "health matters" network of individuals making their first major contact with the city's largest public and voluntary facilities. Overall, we find that the networks on which "first timers" rely to discuss health matters are small, with both focal and network respondents mentioning four individuals on average. The overlap in ties mentioned is just over 2 people (or 56 percent), on average, and differ with regard to the number of friends and health care professionals mentioned. Ironically, listings are more accurate for focal respondents who have more serious mental illnesses or larger networks. The extent of overlap is lower for women focal respondents than men. In sum, while convergence is in a range considered acceptable in network studies, the substantive nature of discrepancies have interesting and important theoretical and clinical implications.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1795-1806
    Number of pages12
    JournalSocial Science and Medicine
    Volume58
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 2004

    Fingerprint

    mental health
    social network
    Social Support
    Mental Health
    health care
    Public Facilities
    Social Perception
    Health
    health
    world
    Surveys and Questionnaires
    Social networks
    Mental health
    Social Networks
    social cognition
    Delivery of Health Care
    large city
    mental illness
    social support
    illness

    Keywords

    • Mental health
    • Social networks
    • Social support
    • USA

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
    • Social Psychology
    • Development
    • Health(social science)

    Cite this

    The view from two worlds : The convergence of social network reports between mental health clients and their ties. / Pescosolido, Bernice A.; Wright, Eric R.

    In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 58, No. 9, 05.2004, p. 1795-1806.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{a49d89dafd804ec6a51e41a1654a8ed6,
    title = "The view from two worlds: The convergence of social network reports between mental health clients and their ties",
    abstract = "Traditionally, concerns with the similarities and discrepancies between the reports of persons (or focal respondents) and their collaterals (or network ties/respondents) about the former's social support network is framed as a methodological concern. As individuals experience the devastating effects of illness, and especially as their cognitive capabilities or social perceptions may be impaired by mental health problems, these listings are seen as potentially problematic. While we share this concern, we expand the investigation of the comparison of network ties from focal and network respondents to consider the nature of differences. Using data from Wave I of the Indianapolis Network Mental Health Study, we target the {"}health matters{"} network of individuals making their first major contact with the city's largest public and voluntary facilities. Overall, we find that the networks on which {"}first timers{"} rely to discuss health matters are small, with both focal and network respondents mentioning four individuals on average. The overlap in ties mentioned is just over 2 people (or 56 percent), on average, and differ with regard to the number of friends and health care professionals mentioned. Ironically, listings are more accurate for focal respondents who have more serious mental illnesses or larger networks. The extent of overlap is lower for women focal respondents than men. In sum, while convergence is in a range considered acceptable in network studies, the substantive nature of discrepancies have interesting and important theoretical and clinical implications.",
    keywords = "Mental health, Social networks, Social support, USA",
    author = "Pescosolido, {Bernice A.} and Wright, {Eric R.}",
    year = "2004",
    month = "5",
    doi = "10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00398-8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "58",
    pages = "1795--1806",
    journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
    issn = "0277-9536",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The view from two worlds

    T2 - The convergence of social network reports between mental health clients and their ties

    AU - Pescosolido, Bernice A.

    AU - Wright, Eric R.

    PY - 2004/5

    Y1 - 2004/5

    N2 - Traditionally, concerns with the similarities and discrepancies between the reports of persons (or focal respondents) and their collaterals (or network ties/respondents) about the former's social support network is framed as a methodological concern. As individuals experience the devastating effects of illness, and especially as their cognitive capabilities or social perceptions may be impaired by mental health problems, these listings are seen as potentially problematic. While we share this concern, we expand the investigation of the comparison of network ties from focal and network respondents to consider the nature of differences. Using data from Wave I of the Indianapolis Network Mental Health Study, we target the "health matters" network of individuals making their first major contact with the city's largest public and voluntary facilities. Overall, we find that the networks on which "first timers" rely to discuss health matters are small, with both focal and network respondents mentioning four individuals on average. The overlap in ties mentioned is just over 2 people (or 56 percent), on average, and differ with regard to the number of friends and health care professionals mentioned. Ironically, listings are more accurate for focal respondents who have more serious mental illnesses or larger networks. The extent of overlap is lower for women focal respondents than men. In sum, while convergence is in a range considered acceptable in network studies, the substantive nature of discrepancies have interesting and important theoretical and clinical implications.

    AB - Traditionally, concerns with the similarities and discrepancies between the reports of persons (or focal respondents) and their collaterals (or network ties/respondents) about the former's social support network is framed as a methodological concern. As individuals experience the devastating effects of illness, and especially as their cognitive capabilities or social perceptions may be impaired by mental health problems, these listings are seen as potentially problematic. While we share this concern, we expand the investigation of the comparison of network ties from focal and network respondents to consider the nature of differences. Using data from Wave I of the Indianapolis Network Mental Health Study, we target the "health matters" network of individuals making their first major contact with the city's largest public and voluntary facilities. Overall, we find that the networks on which "first timers" rely to discuss health matters are small, with both focal and network respondents mentioning four individuals on average. The overlap in ties mentioned is just over 2 people (or 56 percent), on average, and differ with regard to the number of friends and health care professionals mentioned. Ironically, listings are more accurate for focal respondents who have more serious mental illnesses or larger networks. The extent of overlap is lower for women focal respondents than men. In sum, while convergence is in a range considered acceptable in network studies, the substantive nature of discrepancies have interesting and important theoretical and clinical implications.

    KW - Mental health

    KW - Social networks

    KW - Social support

    KW - USA

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1442360012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1442360012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00398-8

    DO - 10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00398-8

    M3 - Article

    VL - 58

    SP - 1795

    EP - 1806

    JO - Social Science and Medicine

    JF - Social Science and Medicine

    SN - 0277-9536

    IS - 9

    ER -