Thirty-five voices in search of an author: what focus groups reveal about patients experiences in managed care settings.

Richard Frankel, Nancy Treger Hourigan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surprisingly little direct information from patients is available in the medical literature. Focus groups, which came into use in the 1940s, provide a simple, cost effective way of exploring attitudes and values within market segments or targeted groups. In healthcare, focus groups are being used to track patients' experiences, expectations and satisfaction in order to optimize quality and cost effectiveness. This study reports on a collaboration of three upstate New York Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) that used the same focus group format and questions to identify' best practices' and opportunities for improvement. Participants across groups reported similar experiences despite differences in geography and plan organization. Members' most positive comments were about costs, preventive services, ease of paper work and access to sick care, all administrative functions of the health plans. The most negative focused on retaining one's physician, telephone access, providers' medical skills, provider behavior and notification of results, all related to interpersonal/communication issues. We conclude that focus groups are useful for understanding and responding to the 'voice of the customer'. They also have some distinct advantages over forced-choice questionnaires, especially in trying to discover the range of patients' experiences and expectations, though they are not without their challenges.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-58
Number of pages14
JournalCommunication & medicine
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Managed Care Programs
Focus Groups
Costs and Cost Analysis
Geography
Health Maintenance Organizations
Practice Guidelines
Telephone
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Communication
Organizations
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Cite this

Thirty-five voices in search of an author : what focus groups reveal about patients experiences in managed care settings. / Frankel, Richard; Hourigan, Nancy Treger.

In: Communication & medicine, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2004, p. 45-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{59e763b6b85546b88cb2174f1a23fa99,
title = "Thirty-five voices in search of an author: what focus groups reveal about patients experiences in managed care settings.",
abstract = "Surprisingly little direct information from patients is available in the medical literature. Focus groups, which came into use in the 1940s, provide a simple, cost effective way of exploring attitudes and values within market segments or targeted groups. In healthcare, focus groups are being used to track patients' experiences, expectations and satisfaction in order to optimize quality and cost effectiveness. This study reports on a collaboration of three upstate New York Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) that used the same focus group format and questions to identify' best practices' and opportunities for improvement. Participants across groups reported similar experiences despite differences in geography and plan organization. Members' most positive comments were about costs, preventive services, ease of paper work and access to sick care, all administrative functions of the health plans. The most negative focused on retaining one's physician, telephone access, providers' medical skills, provider behavior and notification of results, all related to interpersonal/communication issues. We conclude that focus groups are useful for understanding and responding to the 'voice of the customer'. They also have some distinct advantages over forced-choice questionnaires, especially in trying to discover the range of patients' experiences and expectations, though they are not without their challenges.",
author = "Richard Frankel and Hourigan, {Nancy Treger}",
year = "2004",
doi = "10.1515/come.2004.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1",
pages = "45--58",
journal = "Communication and Medicine",
issn = "1612-1783",
publisher = "Equinox Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Thirty-five voices in search of an author

T2 - what focus groups reveal about patients experiences in managed care settings.

AU - Frankel, Richard

AU - Hourigan, Nancy Treger

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - Surprisingly little direct information from patients is available in the medical literature. Focus groups, which came into use in the 1940s, provide a simple, cost effective way of exploring attitudes and values within market segments or targeted groups. In healthcare, focus groups are being used to track patients' experiences, expectations and satisfaction in order to optimize quality and cost effectiveness. This study reports on a collaboration of three upstate New York Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) that used the same focus group format and questions to identify' best practices' and opportunities for improvement. Participants across groups reported similar experiences despite differences in geography and plan organization. Members' most positive comments were about costs, preventive services, ease of paper work and access to sick care, all administrative functions of the health plans. The most negative focused on retaining one's physician, telephone access, providers' medical skills, provider behavior and notification of results, all related to interpersonal/communication issues. We conclude that focus groups are useful for understanding and responding to the 'voice of the customer'. They also have some distinct advantages over forced-choice questionnaires, especially in trying to discover the range of patients' experiences and expectations, though they are not without their challenges.

AB - Surprisingly little direct information from patients is available in the medical literature. Focus groups, which came into use in the 1940s, provide a simple, cost effective way of exploring attitudes and values within market segments or targeted groups. In healthcare, focus groups are being used to track patients' experiences, expectations and satisfaction in order to optimize quality and cost effectiveness. This study reports on a collaboration of three upstate New York Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) that used the same focus group format and questions to identify' best practices' and opportunities for improvement. Participants across groups reported similar experiences despite differences in geography and plan organization. Members' most positive comments were about costs, preventive services, ease of paper work and access to sick care, all administrative functions of the health plans. The most negative focused on retaining one's physician, telephone access, providers' medical skills, provider behavior and notification of results, all related to interpersonal/communication issues. We conclude that focus groups are useful for understanding and responding to the 'voice of the customer'. They also have some distinct advantages over forced-choice questionnaires, especially in trying to discover the range of patients' experiences and expectations, though they are not without their challenges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745886345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745886345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/come.2004.005

DO - 10.1515/come.2004.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 16808688

AN - SCOPUS:33745886345

VL - 1

SP - 45

EP - 58

JO - Communication and Medicine

JF - Communication and Medicine

SN - 1612-1783

IS - 1

ER -