Three-dimensional stress echocardiography: The promise and limitations of volumetric imaging

Stephen G. Sawada, Athanasios Thomaides

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric imaging has potential advantages in stress echocardiography, including the ability to provide an unlimited number of planes for analysis and more rapid acquisition than conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of 3D volumetric imaging and the current and future role of the technique in stress echocardiography. RECENT FINDINGS: Three-dimensional volumetric imaging uniformly shortens the time required for acquisition of stress images. The success of imaging is high with pharmacologic stress but the feasibility is not established with exercise stress. The lower spatial and temporal resolution of 3D imaging and artifacts introduced by suboptimal subvolume integration are limitations of the current 3D technique. The ability to provide more planes for analysis has not been clearly shown to improve the accuracy of stress echocardiography. However, 3D imaging eliminates apical foreshortening, which is common with 2D imaging, and may improve detection of apical wall motion abnormalities. SUMMARY: In general, 3D imaging has shown rates of success and accuracy comparable to those of 2D imaging in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Further studies are needed in larger and more heterogeneous patient populations. As improvements in 3D technology continue, successful application of the technique to exercise echocardiography is likely. Development of automated image registration, quantitative analysis techniques, and single beat acquisition is needed to fully exploit the potential of 3D imaging in the stress laboratory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-432
Number of pages7
JournalCurrent Opinion in Cardiology
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Three-Dimensional Echocardiography
Stress Echocardiography
Exercise
Three-Dimensional Imaging
Artifacts
Echocardiography
Technology
Population

Keywords

  • Noninvasive imaging
  • Stress echocardiography
  • Three-dimensional echocardiography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Three-dimensional stress echocardiography : The promise and limitations of volumetric imaging. / Sawada, Stephen G.; Thomaides, Athanasios.

In: Current Opinion in Cardiology, Vol. 24, No. 5, 09.2009, p. 426-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{270b7e766dd349c2b8290e929f9235d0,
title = "Three-dimensional stress echocardiography: The promise and limitations of volumetric imaging",
abstract = "PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric imaging has potential advantages in stress echocardiography, including the ability to provide an unlimited number of planes for analysis and more rapid acquisition than conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of 3D volumetric imaging and the current and future role of the technique in stress echocardiography. RECENT FINDINGS: Three-dimensional volumetric imaging uniformly shortens the time required for acquisition of stress images. The success of imaging is high with pharmacologic stress but the feasibility is not established with exercise stress. The lower spatial and temporal resolution of 3D imaging and artifacts introduced by suboptimal subvolume integration are limitations of the current 3D technique. The ability to provide more planes for analysis has not been clearly shown to improve the accuracy of stress echocardiography. However, 3D imaging eliminates apical foreshortening, which is common with 2D imaging, and may improve detection of apical wall motion abnormalities. SUMMARY: In general, 3D imaging has shown rates of success and accuracy comparable to those of 2D imaging in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Further studies are needed in larger and more heterogeneous patient populations. As improvements in 3D technology continue, successful application of the technique to exercise echocardiography is likely. Development of automated image registration, quantitative analysis techniques, and single beat acquisition is needed to fully exploit the potential of 3D imaging in the stress laboratory.",
keywords = "Noninvasive imaging, Stress echocardiography, Three-dimensional echocardiography",
author = "Sawada, {Stephen G.} and Athanasios Thomaides",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1097/HCO.0b013e32832c76db",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "426--432",
journal = "Current Opinion in Cardiology",
issn = "0268-4705",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three-dimensional stress echocardiography

T2 - The promise and limitations of volumetric imaging

AU - Sawada, Stephen G.

AU - Thomaides, Athanasios

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric imaging has potential advantages in stress echocardiography, including the ability to provide an unlimited number of planes for analysis and more rapid acquisition than conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of 3D volumetric imaging and the current and future role of the technique in stress echocardiography. RECENT FINDINGS: Three-dimensional volumetric imaging uniformly shortens the time required for acquisition of stress images. The success of imaging is high with pharmacologic stress but the feasibility is not established with exercise stress. The lower spatial and temporal resolution of 3D imaging and artifacts introduced by suboptimal subvolume integration are limitations of the current 3D technique. The ability to provide more planes for analysis has not been clearly shown to improve the accuracy of stress echocardiography. However, 3D imaging eliminates apical foreshortening, which is common with 2D imaging, and may improve detection of apical wall motion abnormalities. SUMMARY: In general, 3D imaging has shown rates of success and accuracy comparable to those of 2D imaging in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Further studies are needed in larger and more heterogeneous patient populations. As improvements in 3D technology continue, successful application of the technique to exercise echocardiography is likely. Development of automated image registration, quantitative analysis techniques, and single beat acquisition is needed to fully exploit the potential of 3D imaging in the stress laboratory.

AB - PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Three-dimensional (3D) volumetric imaging has potential advantages in stress echocardiography, including the ability to provide an unlimited number of planes for analysis and more rapid acquisition than conventional two-dimensional (2D) imaging. This review focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of 3D volumetric imaging and the current and future role of the technique in stress echocardiography. RECENT FINDINGS: Three-dimensional volumetric imaging uniformly shortens the time required for acquisition of stress images. The success of imaging is high with pharmacologic stress but the feasibility is not established with exercise stress. The lower spatial and temporal resolution of 3D imaging and artifacts introduced by suboptimal subvolume integration are limitations of the current 3D technique. The ability to provide more planes for analysis has not been clearly shown to improve the accuracy of stress echocardiography. However, 3D imaging eliminates apical foreshortening, which is common with 2D imaging, and may improve detection of apical wall motion abnormalities. SUMMARY: In general, 3D imaging has shown rates of success and accuracy comparable to those of 2D imaging in pharmacologic stress echocardiography. Further studies are needed in larger and more heterogeneous patient populations. As improvements in 3D technology continue, successful application of the technique to exercise echocardiography is likely. Development of automated image registration, quantitative analysis techniques, and single beat acquisition is needed to fully exploit the potential of 3D imaging in the stress laboratory.

KW - Noninvasive imaging

KW - Stress echocardiography

KW - Three-dimensional echocardiography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69749112916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69749112916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32832c76db

DO - 10.1097/HCO.0b013e32832c76db

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19444094

AN - SCOPUS:69749112916

VL - 24

SP - 426

EP - 432

JO - Current Opinion in Cardiology

JF - Current Opinion in Cardiology

SN - 0268-4705

IS - 5

ER -