Three types of ambiguity in coding empathic interactions in primary care visits: Implications for research and practice

Ashley L. Stone, Ming Tai-Seale, Cheryl D. Stults, Jamie M. Luiz, Richard M. Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To describe three methodological challenges experienced in studying patients' expressions of emotion in a sample of periodic health exams, and the research and practice implications of these challenges. Methods: Qualitative analysis of empathic cues in audio-taped and transcribed periodic health examinations of adult patients (n=322) in an integrated delivery system. The empathic and potential empathic opportunities methodology was used. Results: Identifying emotional cues that constitute " empathic opportunities" is a complex task. Three types of ambiguity made this task particularly challenging: 1) presentations of emotional cues can be " fuzzy" and varied; 2) expressions of illness can be emotionally laden in the absence of explicit " emotion words" ; and 3) empathic opportunities vary in length and intensity. Conclusion: Interactional ambiguities pose a challenge to researchers attempting to document emotional cues with a binary coding scheme that indicates only whether an empathic opportunity is present or absent. Additional efforts to refine the methodological approach for studying empathy in medical interactions are needed. Practice implications: The challenges discussed likely represent the same types of situations physicians find themselves in when talking with patients. Highlighting these ambiguities may aid physicians in better recognizing and meeting the emotional needs of their patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-68
Number of pages6
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume89
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Cues
Primary Health Care
Research
Emotions
Integrated Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Health
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Emotional cues
  • Empathic opportunities
  • Patient-physician communication

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Three types of ambiguity in coding empathic interactions in primary care visits : Implications for research and practice. / Stone, Ashley L.; Tai-Seale, Ming; Stults, Cheryl D.; Luiz, Jamie M.; Frankel, Richard M.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 89, No. 1, 01.10.2012, p. 63-68.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e1448455411e4fd3a17783a1c91929ff,
title = "Three types of ambiguity in coding empathic interactions in primary care visits: Implications for research and practice",
abstract = "Objective: To describe three methodological challenges experienced in studying patients' expressions of emotion in a sample of periodic health exams, and the research and practice implications of these challenges. Methods: Qualitative analysis of empathic cues in audio-taped and transcribed periodic health examinations of adult patients (n=322) in an integrated delivery system. The empathic and potential empathic opportunities methodology was used. Results: Identifying emotional cues that constitute {"} empathic opportunities{"} is a complex task. Three types of ambiguity made this task particularly challenging: 1) presentations of emotional cues can be {"} fuzzy{"} and varied; 2) expressions of illness can be emotionally laden in the absence of explicit {"} emotion words{"} ; and 3) empathic opportunities vary in length and intensity. Conclusion: Interactional ambiguities pose a challenge to researchers attempting to document emotional cues with a binary coding scheme that indicates only whether an empathic opportunity is present or absent. Additional efforts to refine the methodological approach for studying empathy in medical interactions are needed. Practice implications: The challenges discussed likely represent the same types of situations physicians find themselves in when talking with patients. Highlighting these ambiguities may aid physicians in better recognizing and meeting the emotional needs of their patients.",
keywords = "Emotional cues, Empathic opportunities, Patient-physician communication",
author = "Stone, {Ashley L.} and Ming Tai-Seale and Stults, {Cheryl D.} and Luiz, {Jamie M.} and Frankel, {Richard M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "89",
pages = "63--68",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Three types of ambiguity in coding empathic interactions in primary care visits

T2 - Implications for research and practice

AU - Stone, Ashley L.

AU - Tai-Seale, Ming

AU - Stults, Cheryl D.

AU - Luiz, Jamie M.

AU - Frankel, Richard M.

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - Objective: To describe three methodological challenges experienced in studying patients' expressions of emotion in a sample of periodic health exams, and the research and practice implications of these challenges. Methods: Qualitative analysis of empathic cues in audio-taped and transcribed periodic health examinations of adult patients (n=322) in an integrated delivery system. The empathic and potential empathic opportunities methodology was used. Results: Identifying emotional cues that constitute " empathic opportunities" is a complex task. Three types of ambiguity made this task particularly challenging: 1) presentations of emotional cues can be " fuzzy" and varied; 2) expressions of illness can be emotionally laden in the absence of explicit " emotion words" ; and 3) empathic opportunities vary in length and intensity. Conclusion: Interactional ambiguities pose a challenge to researchers attempting to document emotional cues with a binary coding scheme that indicates only whether an empathic opportunity is present or absent. Additional efforts to refine the methodological approach for studying empathy in medical interactions are needed. Practice implications: The challenges discussed likely represent the same types of situations physicians find themselves in when talking with patients. Highlighting these ambiguities may aid physicians in better recognizing and meeting the emotional needs of their patients.

AB - Objective: To describe three methodological challenges experienced in studying patients' expressions of emotion in a sample of periodic health exams, and the research and practice implications of these challenges. Methods: Qualitative analysis of empathic cues in audio-taped and transcribed periodic health examinations of adult patients (n=322) in an integrated delivery system. The empathic and potential empathic opportunities methodology was used. Results: Identifying emotional cues that constitute " empathic opportunities" is a complex task. Three types of ambiguity made this task particularly challenging: 1) presentations of emotional cues can be " fuzzy" and varied; 2) expressions of illness can be emotionally laden in the absence of explicit " emotion words" ; and 3) empathic opportunities vary in length and intensity. Conclusion: Interactional ambiguities pose a challenge to researchers attempting to document emotional cues with a binary coding scheme that indicates only whether an empathic opportunity is present or absent. Additional efforts to refine the methodological approach for studying empathy in medical interactions are needed. Practice implications: The challenges discussed likely represent the same types of situations physicians find themselves in when talking with patients. Highlighting these ambiguities may aid physicians in better recognizing and meeting the emotional needs of their patients.

KW - Emotional cues

KW - Empathic opportunities

KW - Patient-physician communication

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866625904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84866625904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.013

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.013

M3 - Article

C2 - 22809831

AN - SCOPUS:84866625904

VL - 89

SP - 63

EP - 68

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 1

ER -