Tolerances in setup and dosimetric errors in the radiation treatment of breast cancer

Indra J. Das, Chee W. Cheng, Helen Fosmire, Kenneth R. Kase, Thomas J. Fitzgerald

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment failure in radiation therapy, as well as unexpected complications, can be associated with set up changes or variations that can cause deviations from the prescribed radiation dose distribution both inside and outside the target volume. The effect of various deviations from the planned setup on the delivery of the prescribed radiation dose to the desired treatment volume was studied. Methods and Materials: Adding a second simulation was investigated as means of minimizing setup changes on treatment. The first simulation was used for planning the treatment and the second simulation was essentially a mock treatment. Dosimetric evaluations based on dose volume histograms were analyzed for each deviation in the setup. Results: In 95% of the patients, the frequency of the changes in the setup parameters between the second simulation and the treatment setup were reduced significantly from the changes that occurred between the first simulation and the second simulation. The changes in isocenter coordinates up to ±1.0 cm have minimal effects (±2%) on the dose distributions. Gantry angle variations up to ±4° produce a change of less than ±5% in the dose distribution within the target volume. However, this angular variation resulted in additional tissue irradiation outside of the desired treatment field (about 10 cm3 for a large patient). A gantry angle variation of ±6° can change the volume of tissue that receives the prescribed dose by at least ±10%. In addition, such a change can increase the volume of tissue outside the desired treatment field that is irradiated. Conclusion: It is concluded that individually, deviations in one of the parameters from the planned setup of ±1.0 cm in isocenter position and ±4° in gantry angle do not produce significant deviations from the planned dose distribution. However, a significant change in dose distribution is observed if the setup parameters are concurrently changed. A second simulation may minimize the deviations of the treatment setup from the planned setup and maximize the precision in dose delivery to the target volume.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)883-890
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 1993
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

breast
cancer
Radiation
Breast Neoplasms
dosage
radiation
deviation
gantry cranes
simulation
Therapeutics
delivery
Treatment Failure
histograms
Radiotherapy
planning
radiation therapy
irradiation
evaluation
causes

Keywords

  • Breast cancer
  • Dose volume histogram
  • Radiation treatment
  • Setup error
  • Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiation

Cite this

Tolerances in setup and dosimetric errors in the radiation treatment of breast cancer. / Das, Indra J.; Cheng, Chee W.; Fosmire, Helen; Kase, Kenneth R.; Fitzgerald, Thomas J.

In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics, Vol. 26, No. 5, 01.08.1993, p. 883-890.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Das, Indra J. ; Cheng, Chee W. ; Fosmire, Helen ; Kase, Kenneth R. ; Fitzgerald, Thomas J. / Tolerances in setup and dosimetric errors in the radiation treatment of breast cancer. In: International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 1993 ; Vol. 26, No. 5. pp. 883-890.
@article{87022e5f63374ad682c0350c7f59fc9b,
title = "Tolerances in setup and dosimetric errors in the radiation treatment of breast cancer",
abstract = "Purpose: Treatment failure in radiation therapy, as well as unexpected complications, can be associated with set up changes or variations that can cause deviations from the prescribed radiation dose distribution both inside and outside the target volume. The effect of various deviations from the planned setup on the delivery of the prescribed radiation dose to the desired treatment volume was studied. Methods and Materials: Adding a second simulation was investigated as means of minimizing setup changes on treatment. The first simulation was used for planning the treatment and the second simulation was essentially a mock treatment. Dosimetric evaluations based on dose volume histograms were analyzed for each deviation in the setup. Results: In 95{\%} of the patients, the frequency of the changes in the setup parameters between the second simulation and the treatment setup were reduced significantly from the changes that occurred between the first simulation and the second simulation. The changes in isocenter coordinates up to ±1.0 cm have minimal effects (±2{\%}) on the dose distributions. Gantry angle variations up to ±4° produce a change of less than ±5{\%} in the dose distribution within the target volume. However, this angular variation resulted in additional tissue irradiation outside of the desired treatment field (about 10 cm3 for a large patient). A gantry angle variation of ±6° can change the volume of tissue that receives the prescribed dose by at least ±10{\%}. In addition, such a change can increase the volume of tissue outside the desired treatment field that is irradiated. Conclusion: It is concluded that individually, deviations in one of the parameters from the planned setup of ±1.0 cm in isocenter position and ±4° in gantry angle do not produce significant deviations from the planned dose distribution. However, a significant change in dose distribution is observed if the setup parameters are concurrently changed. A second simulation may minimize the deviations of the treatment setup from the planned setup and maximize the precision in dose delivery to the target volume.",
keywords = "Breast cancer, Dose volume histogram, Radiation treatment, Setup error, Simulation",
author = "Das, {Indra J.} and Cheng, {Chee W.} and Helen Fosmire and Kase, {Kenneth R.} and Fitzgerald, {Thomas J.}",
year = "1993",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/0360-3016(93)90505-P",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "883--890",
journal = "International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics",
issn = "0360-3016",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tolerances in setup and dosimetric errors in the radiation treatment of breast cancer

AU - Das, Indra J.

AU - Cheng, Chee W.

AU - Fosmire, Helen

AU - Kase, Kenneth R.

AU - Fitzgerald, Thomas J.

PY - 1993/8/1

Y1 - 1993/8/1

N2 - Purpose: Treatment failure in radiation therapy, as well as unexpected complications, can be associated with set up changes or variations that can cause deviations from the prescribed radiation dose distribution both inside and outside the target volume. The effect of various deviations from the planned setup on the delivery of the prescribed radiation dose to the desired treatment volume was studied. Methods and Materials: Adding a second simulation was investigated as means of minimizing setup changes on treatment. The first simulation was used for planning the treatment and the second simulation was essentially a mock treatment. Dosimetric evaluations based on dose volume histograms were analyzed for each deviation in the setup. Results: In 95% of the patients, the frequency of the changes in the setup parameters between the second simulation and the treatment setup were reduced significantly from the changes that occurred between the first simulation and the second simulation. The changes in isocenter coordinates up to ±1.0 cm have minimal effects (±2%) on the dose distributions. Gantry angle variations up to ±4° produce a change of less than ±5% in the dose distribution within the target volume. However, this angular variation resulted in additional tissue irradiation outside of the desired treatment field (about 10 cm3 for a large patient). A gantry angle variation of ±6° can change the volume of tissue that receives the prescribed dose by at least ±10%. In addition, such a change can increase the volume of tissue outside the desired treatment field that is irradiated. Conclusion: It is concluded that individually, deviations in one of the parameters from the planned setup of ±1.0 cm in isocenter position and ±4° in gantry angle do not produce significant deviations from the planned dose distribution. However, a significant change in dose distribution is observed if the setup parameters are concurrently changed. A second simulation may minimize the deviations of the treatment setup from the planned setup and maximize the precision in dose delivery to the target volume.

AB - Purpose: Treatment failure in radiation therapy, as well as unexpected complications, can be associated with set up changes or variations that can cause deviations from the prescribed radiation dose distribution both inside and outside the target volume. The effect of various deviations from the planned setup on the delivery of the prescribed radiation dose to the desired treatment volume was studied. Methods and Materials: Adding a second simulation was investigated as means of minimizing setup changes on treatment. The first simulation was used for planning the treatment and the second simulation was essentially a mock treatment. Dosimetric evaluations based on dose volume histograms were analyzed for each deviation in the setup. Results: In 95% of the patients, the frequency of the changes in the setup parameters between the second simulation and the treatment setup were reduced significantly from the changes that occurred between the first simulation and the second simulation. The changes in isocenter coordinates up to ±1.0 cm have minimal effects (±2%) on the dose distributions. Gantry angle variations up to ±4° produce a change of less than ±5% in the dose distribution within the target volume. However, this angular variation resulted in additional tissue irradiation outside of the desired treatment field (about 10 cm3 for a large patient). A gantry angle variation of ±6° can change the volume of tissue that receives the prescribed dose by at least ±10%. In addition, such a change can increase the volume of tissue outside the desired treatment field that is irradiated. Conclusion: It is concluded that individually, deviations in one of the parameters from the planned setup of ±1.0 cm in isocenter position and ±4° in gantry angle do not produce significant deviations from the planned dose distribution. However, a significant change in dose distribution is observed if the setup parameters are concurrently changed. A second simulation may minimize the deviations of the treatment setup from the planned setup and maximize the precision in dose delivery to the target volume.

KW - Breast cancer

KW - Dose volume histogram

KW - Radiation treatment

KW - Setup error

KW - Simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027171001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027171001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90505-P

DO - 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90505-P

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 883

EP - 890

JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics

SN - 0360-3016

IS - 5

ER -