Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents

Joseph Dynlacht, Mark W. Dewhirst, Eric J. Hall, Barry S. Rosenstein, Elaine M. Zeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There are approximately 82 radiation oncology residency programs in the United States, which provide training opportunities for about 400 residents. All accredited radiation oncology residency programs must have at least one basic scientist on the faculty, and it is these individuals who often assume, wholly or in part, the responsibility of teaching radiation and cancer biology to radiation oncology residents in preparation for the American College of Radiology (ACR) In-Training Examination in Radiation Oncology and the American Board of Radiology (ABR) written examinations. In response to a perceived lack of uniformity in radiation and cancer biology curricula currently being taught to residents and a perceived lack of guidance for instructors in formulating course content for this population, a special session was presented at the Forty-eighth Annual Radiation Research Society meeting on April 23, 2001. The session, entitled "Toward a Consensus on Radiobiology Teaching to Radiation Oncology Residents", was focused on issues related to teaching radio-biology to radiation oncology residents and targeted for individuals who actively teach radiation and cancer biology as well as coordinators of residency training programs. The speakers addressed current challenges and future problems facing instructors and programs. Among these were lack of feedback on resident performance on ABR and ACR written examinations and on course content, uncertainty about what topics residents must know to pass the ABR examination, and, in the near future, a reduction (due to retirement) of instructors qualified to teach radiobiology. This article provides a synopsis of the information that was presented during that session, offers a glimpse into how the ABR and ACR examinations are prepared and details of the content of past and future examinations, and summarizes the activities of the Joint Working Group on Radiobiology Teaching which was formed to educate instructors, to establish a consensus for course curricula, and to improve the overall quality of resident teaching.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-606
Number of pages8
JournalRadiation Research
Volume157
Issue number5
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Radiobiology
radiobiology
Radiation Oncology
radiology
Radiology
Teaching
education
teachers
radiation
instructors
examination
Internship and Residency
biology
Biological Sciences
curriculum
Curriculum
neoplasms
cancer
Neoplasms
Retirement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Radiation

Cite this

Dynlacht, J., Dewhirst, M. W., Hall, E. J., Rosenstein, B. S., & Zeman, E. M. (2002). Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents. Radiation Research, 157(5), 599-606.

Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents. / Dynlacht, Joseph; Dewhirst, Mark W.; Hall, Eric J.; Rosenstein, Barry S.; Zeman, Elaine M.

In: Radiation Research, Vol. 157, No. 5, 2002, p. 599-606.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dynlacht, J, Dewhirst, MW, Hall, EJ, Rosenstein, BS & Zeman, EM 2002, 'Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents', Radiation Research, vol. 157, no. 5, pp. 599-606.
Dynlacht J, Dewhirst MW, Hall EJ, Rosenstein BS, Zeman EM. Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents. Radiation Research. 2002;157(5):599-606.
Dynlacht, Joseph ; Dewhirst, Mark W. ; Hall, Eric J. ; Rosenstein, Barry S. ; Zeman, Elaine M. / Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents. In: Radiation Research. 2002 ; Vol. 157, No. 5. pp. 599-606.
@article{9a14e22ca9164ea0861e056aa248ade5,
title = "Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents",
abstract = "There are approximately 82 radiation oncology residency programs in the United States, which provide training opportunities for about 400 residents. All accredited radiation oncology residency programs must have at least one basic scientist on the faculty, and it is these individuals who often assume, wholly or in part, the responsibility of teaching radiation and cancer biology to radiation oncology residents in preparation for the American College of Radiology (ACR) In-Training Examination in Radiation Oncology and the American Board of Radiology (ABR) written examinations. In response to a perceived lack of uniformity in radiation and cancer biology curricula currently being taught to residents and a perceived lack of guidance for instructors in formulating course content for this population, a special session was presented at the Forty-eighth Annual Radiation Research Society meeting on April 23, 2001. The session, entitled {"}Toward a Consensus on Radiobiology Teaching to Radiation Oncology Residents{"}, was focused on issues related to teaching radio-biology to radiation oncology residents and targeted for individuals who actively teach radiation and cancer biology as well as coordinators of residency training programs. The speakers addressed current challenges and future problems facing instructors and programs. Among these were lack of feedback on resident performance on ABR and ACR written examinations and on course content, uncertainty about what topics residents must know to pass the ABR examination, and, in the near future, a reduction (due to retirement) of instructors qualified to teach radiobiology. This article provides a synopsis of the information that was presented during that session, offers a glimpse into how the ABR and ACR examinations are prepared and details of the content of past and future examinations, and summarizes the activities of the Joint Working Group on Radiobiology Teaching which was formed to educate instructors, to establish a consensus for course curricula, and to improve the overall quality of resident teaching.",
author = "Joseph Dynlacht and Dewhirst, {Mark W.} and Hall, {Eric J.} and Rosenstein, {Barry S.} and Zeman, {Elaine M.}",
year = "2002",
language = "English",
volume = "157",
pages = "599--606",
journal = "Radiation Research",
issn = "0033-7587",
publisher = "Radiation Research Society",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a consensus on radiobiology teaching to radiation oncology residents

AU - Dynlacht, Joseph

AU - Dewhirst, Mark W.

AU - Hall, Eric J.

AU - Rosenstein, Barry S.

AU - Zeman, Elaine M.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - There are approximately 82 radiation oncology residency programs in the United States, which provide training opportunities for about 400 residents. All accredited radiation oncology residency programs must have at least one basic scientist on the faculty, and it is these individuals who often assume, wholly or in part, the responsibility of teaching radiation and cancer biology to radiation oncology residents in preparation for the American College of Radiology (ACR) In-Training Examination in Radiation Oncology and the American Board of Radiology (ABR) written examinations. In response to a perceived lack of uniformity in radiation and cancer biology curricula currently being taught to residents and a perceived lack of guidance for instructors in formulating course content for this population, a special session was presented at the Forty-eighth Annual Radiation Research Society meeting on April 23, 2001. The session, entitled "Toward a Consensus on Radiobiology Teaching to Radiation Oncology Residents", was focused on issues related to teaching radio-biology to radiation oncology residents and targeted for individuals who actively teach radiation and cancer biology as well as coordinators of residency training programs. The speakers addressed current challenges and future problems facing instructors and programs. Among these were lack of feedback on resident performance on ABR and ACR written examinations and on course content, uncertainty about what topics residents must know to pass the ABR examination, and, in the near future, a reduction (due to retirement) of instructors qualified to teach radiobiology. This article provides a synopsis of the information that was presented during that session, offers a glimpse into how the ABR and ACR examinations are prepared and details of the content of past and future examinations, and summarizes the activities of the Joint Working Group on Radiobiology Teaching which was formed to educate instructors, to establish a consensus for course curricula, and to improve the overall quality of resident teaching.

AB - There are approximately 82 radiation oncology residency programs in the United States, which provide training opportunities for about 400 residents. All accredited radiation oncology residency programs must have at least one basic scientist on the faculty, and it is these individuals who often assume, wholly or in part, the responsibility of teaching radiation and cancer biology to radiation oncology residents in preparation for the American College of Radiology (ACR) In-Training Examination in Radiation Oncology and the American Board of Radiology (ABR) written examinations. In response to a perceived lack of uniformity in radiation and cancer biology curricula currently being taught to residents and a perceived lack of guidance for instructors in formulating course content for this population, a special session was presented at the Forty-eighth Annual Radiation Research Society meeting on April 23, 2001. The session, entitled "Toward a Consensus on Radiobiology Teaching to Radiation Oncology Residents", was focused on issues related to teaching radio-biology to radiation oncology residents and targeted for individuals who actively teach radiation and cancer biology as well as coordinators of residency training programs. The speakers addressed current challenges and future problems facing instructors and programs. Among these were lack of feedback on resident performance on ABR and ACR written examinations and on course content, uncertainty about what topics residents must know to pass the ABR examination, and, in the near future, a reduction (due to retirement) of instructors qualified to teach radiobiology. This article provides a synopsis of the information that was presented during that session, offers a glimpse into how the ABR and ACR examinations are prepared and details of the content of past and future examinations, and summarizes the activities of the Joint Working Group on Radiobiology Teaching which was formed to educate instructors, to establish a consensus for course curricula, and to improve the overall quality of resident teaching.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036254824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036254824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11966327

AN - SCOPUS:0036254824

VL - 157

SP - 599

EP - 606

JO - Radiation Research

JF - Radiation Research

SN - 0033-7587

IS - 5

ER -