Toward timely data for cancer research

Assessment and reengineering of the cancer reporting process

Abdulrahman M. Jabour, Brian Dixon, Josette F. Jones, David Haggstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Cancer registries systematically collect cancer-related data to support cancer surveillance activities. However, cancer data are often unavailable for months to years after diagnosis, limiting its utility. Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the barriers to rapid cancer reporting and identify ways to shorten the turnaround time. Methods: Certified cancer registrars reporting to the Indiana State Department of Health cancer registry participated in a semistructured interview. Registrars were asked to describe the reporting process, estimate the duration of each step, and identify any barriers that may impact the reporting speed. Qualitative data analysis was performed with the intent of generating recommendations for workflow redesign. The existing and redesigned workflows were simulated for comparison. Results: Barriers to rapid reporting included access to medical records from multiple facilities and the waiting period from diagnosis to treatment. The redesigned workflow focused on facilitating data sharing between registrars and applying a more efficient queuing technique while registrars await the delivery of treatment. The simulation results demonstrated that our recommendations to reduce the waiting period and share information could potentially improve the average reporting speed by 87 days. Conclusions: Knowing the time elapsing at each step within the reporting process helps in prioritizing the needs and estimating the impact of future interventions. Where some previous studies focused on automating some of the cancer reporting activities, we anticipate much shorter reporting by leveraging health information technologies to target this waiting period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere4
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Research
Workflow
Neoplasms
Registries
Medical Informatics
Information Dissemination
Medical Records
Interviews
Health

Keywords

  • Computer simulation
  • Data collection
  • Epidemiological monitoring
  • Neoplasms
  • Registries
  • SEER program
  • Workflow

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Toward timely data for cancer research : Assessment and reengineering of the cancer reporting process. / Jabour, Abdulrahman M.; Dixon, Brian; Jones, Josette F.; Haggstrom, David.

In: Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, e4, 01.03.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ce2ed21607b4b3889748b1ec8546f36,
title = "Toward timely data for cancer research: Assessment and reengineering of the cancer reporting process",
abstract = "Background: Cancer registries systematically collect cancer-related data to support cancer surveillance activities. However, cancer data are often unavailable for months to years after diagnosis, limiting its utility. Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the barriers to rapid cancer reporting and identify ways to shorten the turnaround time. Methods: Certified cancer registrars reporting to the Indiana State Department of Health cancer registry participated in a semistructured interview. Registrars were asked to describe the reporting process, estimate the duration of each step, and identify any barriers that may impact the reporting speed. Qualitative data analysis was performed with the intent of generating recommendations for workflow redesign. The existing and redesigned workflows were simulated for comparison. Results: Barriers to rapid reporting included access to medical records from multiple facilities and the waiting period from diagnosis to treatment. The redesigned workflow focused on facilitating data sharing between registrars and applying a more efficient queuing technique while registrars await the delivery of treatment. The simulation results demonstrated that our recommendations to reduce the waiting period and share information could potentially improve the average reporting speed by 87 days. Conclusions: Knowing the time elapsing at each step within the reporting process helps in prioritizing the needs and estimating the impact of future interventions. Where some previous studies focused on automating some of the cancer reporting activities, we anticipate much shorter reporting by leveraging health information technologies to target this waiting period.",
keywords = "Computer simulation, Data collection, Epidemiological monitoring, Neoplasms, Registries, SEER program, Workflow",
author = "Jabour, {Abdulrahman M.} and Brian Dixon and Jones, {Josette F.} and David Haggstrom",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2196/cancer.7515",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
journal = "Journal of Medical Internet Research",
issn = "1439-4456",
publisher = "Journal of medical Internet Research",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward timely data for cancer research

T2 - Assessment and reengineering of the cancer reporting process

AU - Jabour, Abdulrahman M.

AU - Dixon, Brian

AU - Jones, Josette F.

AU - Haggstrom, David

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Background: Cancer registries systematically collect cancer-related data to support cancer surveillance activities. However, cancer data are often unavailable for months to years after diagnosis, limiting its utility. Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the barriers to rapid cancer reporting and identify ways to shorten the turnaround time. Methods: Certified cancer registrars reporting to the Indiana State Department of Health cancer registry participated in a semistructured interview. Registrars were asked to describe the reporting process, estimate the duration of each step, and identify any barriers that may impact the reporting speed. Qualitative data analysis was performed with the intent of generating recommendations for workflow redesign. The existing and redesigned workflows were simulated for comparison. Results: Barriers to rapid reporting included access to medical records from multiple facilities and the waiting period from diagnosis to treatment. The redesigned workflow focused on facilitating data sharing between registrars and applying a more efficient queuing technique while registrars await the delivery of treatment. The simulation results demonstrated that our recommendations to reduce the waiting period and share information could potentially improve the average reporting speed by 87 days. Conclusions: Knowing the time elapsing at each step within the reporting process helps in prioritizing the needs and estimating the impact of future interventions. Where some previous studies focused on automating some of the cancer reporting activities, we anticipate much shorter reporting by leveraging health information technologies to target this waiting period.

AB - Background: Cancer registries systematically collect cancer-related data to support cancer surveillance activities. However, cancer data are often unavailable for months to years after diagnosis, limiting its utility. Objective: The objective of this study was to identify the barriers to rapid cancer reporting and identify ways to shorten the turnaround time. Methods: Certified cancer registrars reporting to the Indiana State Department of Health cancer registry participated in a semistructured interview. Registrars were asked to describe the reporting process, estimate the duration of each step, and identify any barriers that may impact the reporting speed. Qualitative data analysis was performed with the intent of generating recommendations for workflow redesign. The existing and redesigned workflows were simulated for comparison. Results: Barriers to rapid reporting included access to medical records from multiple facilities and the waiting period from diagnosis to treatment. The redesigned workflow focused on facilitating data sharing between registrars and applying a more efficient queuing technique while registrars await the delivery of treatment. The simulation results demonstrated that our recommendations to reduce the waiting period and share information could potentially improve the average reporting speed by 87 days. Conclusions: Knowing the time elapsing at each step within the reporting process helps in prioritizing the needs and estimating the impact of future interventions. Where some previous studies focused on automating some of the cancer reporting activities, we anticipate much shorter reporting by leveraging health information technologies to target this waiting period.

KW - Computer simulation

KW - Data collection

KW - Epidemiological monitoring

KW - Neoplasms

KW - Registries

KW - SEER program

KW - Workflow

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047725495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047725495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2196/cancer.7515

DO - 10.2196/cancer.7515

M3 - Article

VL - 20

JO - Journal of Medical Internet Research

JF - Journal of Medical Internet Research

SN - 1439-4456

IS - 3

M1 - e4

ER -