Turbidimetric D-Dimer Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

A Metaanalysis

Michael D. Brown, Joseph Lau, R. Darrell Nelson, Jeffrey Kline

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinicians in outpatient clinics and emergency departments desire an accurate quantitative D-dimer assay. The study objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance characteristics of the latex turbidimetric D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department population. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and bibliographies of previous systematic reviews with no language restriction. Experts in the field of PE research were contacted to identify unpublished studies. Prospective investigations involving predominately outpatient populations with suspected PE that used a turbidimetric D-dimer test were included. Two authors extracted data independently and assessed study quality based on the composition of the patient spectrum and the reference standard used. Consensus was reached by conference. The analysis was based on a summary ROC curve and combining sensitivity and specificity independently across studies using a random-effects model. Results: The search yielded 264 publications and 2 unpublished studies. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and provided a sample of 1901 individuals. Eight of the nine studies were homogeneous in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. One study had similar sensitivity but higher specificity. Combining the studies yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.96) and an overall specificity of 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.59). Conclusions: The turbidimetric D-dimer test is sensitive but nonspecific for the detection of PE in the emergency department setting. D-Dimer tests using latex turbidimetric methods appear to have test characteristics comparable to those for ELISA methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1846-1853
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Chemistry
Volume49
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pulmonary Embolism
Hospital Emergency Service
Latex
Sensitivity and Specificity
Confidence Intervals
Bibliographies
Bibliography
Ambulatory Care Facilities
MEDLINE
ROC Curve
Population
Publications
Assays
Consensus
Outpatients
Language
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
fibrin fragment D
Chemical analysis
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Biochemistry

Cite this

Turbidimetric D-Dimer Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism : A Metaanalysis. / Brown, Michael D.; Lau, Joseph; Nelson, R. Darrell; Kline, Jeffrey.

In: Clinical Chemistry, Vol. 49, No. 11, 11.2003, p. 1846-1853.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Brown, Michael D. ; Lau, Joseph ; Nelson, R. Darrell ; Kline, Jeffrey. / Turbidimetric D-Dimer Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism : A Metaanalysis. In: Clinical Chemistry. 2003 ; Vol. 49, No. 11. pp. 1846-1853.
@article{1cc92b7edefe495db5ddd472b2c03bb8,
title = "Turbidimetric D-Dimer Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Metaanalysis",
abstract = "Background: Clinicians in outpatient clinics and emergency departments desire an accurate quantitative D-dimer assay. The study objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance characteristics of the latex turbidimetric D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department population. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and bibliographies of previous systematic reviews with no language restriction. Experts in the field of PE research were contacted to identify unpublished studies. Prospective investigations involving predominately outpatient populations with suspected PE that used a turbidimetric D-dimer test were included. Two authors extracted data independently and assessed study quality based on the composition of the patient spectrum and the reference standard used. Consensus was reached by conference. The analysis was based on a summary ROC curve and combining sensitivity and specificity independently across studies using a random-effects model. Results: The search yielded 264 publications and 2 unpublished studies. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and provided a sample of 1901 individuals. Eight of the nine studies were homogeneous in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. One study had similar sensitivity but higher specificity. Combining the studies yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.93 (95{\%} confidence interval, 0.89-0.96) and an overall specificity of 0.51 (95{\%} confidence interval, 0.42-0.59). Conclusions: The turbidimetric D-dimer test is sensitive but nonspecific for the detection of PE in the emergency department setting. D-Dimer tests using latex turbidimetric methods appear to have test characteristics comparable to those for ELISA methods.",
author = "Brown, {Michael D.} and Joseph Lau and Nelson, {R. Darrell} and Jeffrey Kline",
year = "2003",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1373/clinchem.2003.022277",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1846--1853",
journal = "Clinical Chemistry",
issn = "0009-9147",
publisher = "American Association for Clinical Chemistry Inc.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Turbidimetric D-Dimer Test in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism

T2 - A Metaanalysis

AU - Brown, Michael D.

AU - Lau, Joseph

AU - Nelson, R. Darrell

AU - Kline, Jeffrey

PY - 2003/11

Y1 - 2003/11

N2 - Background: Clinicians in outpatient clinics and emergency departments desire an accurate quantitative D-dimer assay. The study objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance characteristics of the latex turbidimetric D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department population. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and bibliographies of previous systematic reviews with no language restriction. Experts in the field of PE research were contacted to identify unpublished studies. Prospective investigations involving predominately outpatient populations with suspected PE that used a turbidimetric D-dimer test were included. Two authors extracted data independently and assessed study quality based on the composition of the patient spectrum and the reference standard used. Consensus was reached by conference. The analysis was based on a summary ROC curve and combining sensitivity and specificity independently across studies using a random-effects model. Results: The search yielded 264 publications and 2 unpublished studies. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and provided a sample of 1901 individuals. Eight of the nine studies were homogeneous in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. One study had similar sensitivity but higher specificity. Combining the studies yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.96) and an overall specificity of 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.59). Conclusions: The turbidimetric D-dimer test is sensitive but nonspecific for the detection of PE in the emergency department setting. D-Dimer tests using latex turbidimetric methods appear to have test characteristics comparable to those for ELISA methods.

AB - Background: Clinicians in outpatient clinics and emergency departments desire an accurate quantitative D-dimer assay. The study objective was to evaluate the diagnostic performance characteristics of the latex turbidimetric D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department population. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and bibliographies of previous systematic reviews with no language restriction. Experts in the field of PE research were contacted to identify unpublished studies. Prospective investigations involving predominately outpatient populations with suspected PE that used a turbidimetric D-dimer test were included. Two authors extracted data independently and assessed study quality based on the composition of the patient spectrum and the reference standard used. Consensus was reached by conference. The analysis was based on a summary ROC curve and combining sensitivity and specificity independently across studies using a random-effects model. Results: The search yielded 264 publications and 2 unpublished studies. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria and provided a sample of 1901 individuals. Eight of the nine studies were homogeneous in terms of both sensitivity and specificity. One study had similar sensitivity but higher specificity. Combining the studies yielded an overall sensitivity of 0.93 (95% confidence interval, 0.89-0.96) and an overall specificity of 0.51 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.59). Conclusions: The turbidimetric D-dimer test is sensitive but nonspecific for the detection of PE in the emergency department setting. D-Dimer tests using latex turbidimetric methods appear to have test characteristics comparable to those for ELISA methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242331112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242331112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1373/clinchem.2003.022277

DO - 10.1373/clinchem.2003.022277

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 1846

EP - 1853

JO - Clinical Chemistry

JF - Clinical Chemistry

SN - 0009-9147

IS - 11

ER -