Types of faculty incivility as viewed by students in bachelor of science in nursing programs

Heidi Kathleen Holtz, Susan Rawl, Claire Draucker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND Faculty incivility can negatively affect student learning outcomes and safe clinical performance, yet little is known about the types of faculty incivility experienced by students. AIM The aim of this qualitative descriptive study was to describe common types of incidents of faculty incivility as reported by students enrolled in traditional bachelor of science in nursing programs. MEHTOD Qualitative descriptive methods were used to analyze the narratives of 30 students who had experienced incidents of faculty incivility. RESULTS A typology explicating the different ways students perceive faculty to be uncivil included six categories: judging or labeling students, impeding student progress, picking on students, putting students on the spot, withholding instruction, and forcing students into no-win situations. CONCLUSION Nursing faculty and administrators can use the incident typology to guide discussions related to detecting, assessing, and preventing incivility in nursing education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-90
Number of pages6
JournalNursing Education Perspectives
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

bachelor
Nursing
nursing
Students
science
student
incident
typology
Nursing Faculties
Nursing Education
Administrative Personnel
Learning
instruction
narrative

Keywords

  • Faculty Incivility
  • Incivility in Nursing Education
  • Nursing Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Types of faculty incivility as viewed by students in bachelor of science in nursing programs. / Holtz, Heidi Kathleen; Rawl, Susan; Draucker, Claire.

In: Nursing Education Perspectives, Vol. 39, No. 2, 01.01.2018, p. 85-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{90cb3f86fd954e6286bad5636062e2af,
title = "Types of faculty incivility as viewed by students in bachelor of science in nursing programs",
abstract = "BACKGROUND Faculty incivility can negatively affect student learning outcomes and safe clinical performance, yet little is known about the types of faculty incivility experienced by students. AIM The aim of this qualitative descriptive study was to describe common types of incidents of faculty incivility as reported by students enrolled in traditional bachelor of science in nursing programs. MEHTOD Qualitative descriptive methods were used to analyze the narratives of 30 students who had experienced incidents of faculty incivility. RESULTS A typology explicating the different ways students perceive faculty to be uncivil included six categories: judging or labeling students, impeding student progress, picking on students, putting students on the spot, withholding instruction, and forcing students into no-win situations. CONCLUSION Nursing faculty and administrators can use the incident typology to guide discussions related to detecting, assessing, and preventing incivility in nursing education.",
keywords = "Faculty Incivility, Incivility in Nursing Education, Nursing Students",
author = "Holtz, {Heidi Kathleen} and Susan Rawl and Claire Draucker",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000287",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "85--90",
journal = "Nursing Education Perspectives",
issn = "1536-5026",
publisher = "National League for Nursing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Types of faculty incivility as viewed by students in bachelor of science in nursing programs

AU - Holtz, Heidi Kathleen

AU - Rawl, Susan

AU - Draucker, Claire

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND Faculty incivility can negatively affect student learning outcomes and safe clinical performance, yet little is known about the types of faculty incivility experienced by students. AIM The aim of this qualitative descriptive study was to describe common types of incidents of faculty incivility as reported by students enrolled in traditional bachelor of science in nursing programs. MEHTOD Qualitative descriptive methods were used to analyze the narratives of 30 students who had experienced incidents of faculty incivility. RESULTS A typology explicating the different ways students perceive faculty to be uncivil included six categories: judging or labeling students, impeding student progress, picking on students, putting students on the spot, withholding instruction, and forcing students into no-win situations. CONCLUSION Nursing faculty and administrators can use the incident typology to guide discussions related to detecting, assessing, and preventing incivility in nursing education.

AB - BACKGROUND Faculty incivility can negatively affect student learning outcomes and safe clinical performance, yet little is known about the types of faculty incivility experienced by students. AIM The aim of this qualitative descriptive study was to describe common types of incidents of faculty incivility as reported by students enrolled in traditional bachelor of science in nursing programs. MEHTOD Qualitative descriptive methods were used to analyze the narratives of 30 students who had experienced incidents of faculty incivility. RESULTS A typology explicating the different ways students perceive faculty to be uncivil included six categories: judging or labeling students, impeding student progress, picking on students, putting students on the spot, withholding instruction, and forcing students into no-win situations. CONCLUSION Nursing faculty and administrators can use the incident typology to guide discussions related to detecting, assessing, and preventing incivility in nursing education.

KW - Faculty Incivility

KW - Incivility in Nursing Education

KW - Nursing Students

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047650571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047650571&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000287

DO - 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000287

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 85

EP - 90

JO - Nursing Education Perspectives

JF - Nursing Education Perspectives

SN - 1536-5026

IS - 2

ER -