Ultrasound diagnosis of multicystic dysplastic kidney: Is a confirmatory nuclear medicine scan necessary?

Benjamin Whittam, Adam Calaway, Konrad Szymanski, Aaron Carroll, Rosalie Misseri, Martin Kaefer, Richard C. Rink, Boaz Karmazyn, Mark P. Cain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective It is critical to differentiate between a multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) and a kidney with severe hydronephrosis as the treatment varies significantly. We designed a study to compare renal ultrasound (RUS) to nuclear medicine (NM) scan in the diagnosis of MCDK, in order to determine if RUS can be used for the definitive diagnosis of MCKD without use of NM scan. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of children with MCDK, who underwent both a RUS and Tc-99m MAG3 or DMSA scan. We planned to calculate the positive predictive value of an RUS diagnosis of MCDK, using NM scan diagnosis of a nonfunctioning kidney as the gold standard. Results The diagnosis of MCDK was made by RUS in 91 patients, 84 of whom had a normal bladder US. NM confirmed the diagnosis of MCDK in all 84 of these patients (100%). Conclusion We have demonstrated a high predictive value for RUS in the diagnosis of MCDK. Our data support that in healthy infants with RUS diagnosis of unilateral MCDK and normal bladder US, NM scan may be unnecessary to confirm the diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1059-1062
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Pediatric Urology
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Multicystic Dysplastic Kidney
Nuclear Medicine
Kidney
Urinary Bladder
Succimer
Hydronephrosis

Keywords

  • Hydronephrosis
  • Multicystic dysplastic kidney
  • Renal ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ultrasound diagnosis of multicystic dysplastic kidney : Is a confirmatory nuclear medicine scan necessary? / Whittam, Benjamin; Calaway, Adam; Szymanski, Konrad; Carroll, Aaron; Misseri, Rosalie; Kaefer, Martin; Rink, Richard C.; Karmazyn, Boaz; Cain, Mark P.

In: Journal of Pediatric Urology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 1059-1062.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1b312a0134e94277bd83c494214b85ae,
title = "Ultrasound diagnosis of multicystic dysplastic kidney: Is a confirmatory nuclear medicine scan necessary?",
abstract = "Objective It is critical to differentiate between a multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) and a kidney with severe hydronephrosis as the treatment varies significantly. We designed a study to compare renal ultrasound (RUS) to nuclear medicine (NM) scan in the diagnosis of MCDK, in order to determine if RUS can be used for the definitive diagnosis of MCKD without use of NM scan. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of children with MCDK, who underwent both a RUS and Tc-99m MAG3 or DMSA scan. We planned to calculate the positive predictive value of an RUS diagnosis of MCDK, using NM scan diagnosis of a nonfunctioning kidney as the gold standard. Results The diagnosis of MCDK was made by RUS in 91 patients, 84 of whom had a normal bladder US. NM confirmed the diagnosis of MCDK in all 84 of these patients (100{\%}). Conclusion We have demonstrated a high predictive value for RUS in the diagnosis of MCDK. Our data support that in healthy infants with RUS diagnosis of unilateral MCDK and normal bladder US, NM scan may be unnecessary to confirm the diagnosis.",
keywords = "Hydronephrosis, Multicystic dysplastic kidney, Renal ultrasound",
author = "Benjamin Whittam and Adam Calaway and Konrad Szymanski and Aaron Carroll and Rosalie Misseri and Martin Kaefer and Rink, {Richard C.} and Boaz Karmazyn and Cain, {Mark P.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.03.011",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1059--1062",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Urology",
issn = "1477-5131",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound diagnosis of multicystic dysplastic kidney

T2 - Is a confirmatory nuclear medicine scan necessary?

AU - Whittam, Benjamin

AU - Calaway, Adam

AU - Szymanski, Konrad

AU - Carroll, Aaron

AU - Misseri, Rosalie

AU - Kaefer, Martin

AU - Rink, Richard C.

AU - Karmazyn, Boaz

AU - Cain, Mark P.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Objective It is critical to differentiate between a multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) and a kidney with severe hydronephrosis as the treatment varies significantly. We designed a study to compare renal ultrasound (RUS) to nuclear medicine (NM) scan in the diagnosis of MCDK, in order to determine if RUS can be used for the definitive diagnosis of MCKD without use of NM scan. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of children with MCDK, who underwent both a RUS and Tc-99m MAG3 or DMSA scan. We planned to calculate the positive predictive value of an RUS diagnosis of MCDK, using NM scan diagnosis of a nonfunctioning kidney as the gold standard. Results The diagnosis of MCDK was made by RUS in 91 patients, 84 of whom had a normal bladder US. NM confirmed the diagnosis of MCDK in all 84 of these patients (100%). Conclusion We have demonstrated a high predictive value for RUS in the diagnosis of MCDK. Our data support that in healthy infants with RUS diagnosis of unilateral MCDK and normal bladder US, NM scan may be unnecessary to confirm the diagnosis.

AB - Objective It is critical to differentiate between a multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK) and a kidney with severe hydronephrosis as the treatment varies significantly. We designed a study to compare renal ultrasound (RUS) to nuclear medicine (NM) scan in the diagnosis of MCDK, in order to determine if RUS can be used for the definitive diagnosis of MCKD without use of NM scan. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective review of children with MCDK, who underwent both a RUS and Tc-99m MAG3 or DMSA scan. We planned to calculate the positive predictive value of an RUS diagnosis of MCDK, using NM scan diagnosis of a nonfunctioning kidney as the gold standard. Results The diagnosis of MCDK was made by RUS in 91 patients, 84 of whom had a normal bladder US. NM confirmed the diagnosis of MCDK in all 84 of these patients (100%). Conclusion We have demonstrated a high predictive value for RUS in the diagnosis of MCDK. Our data support that in healthy infants with RUS diagnosis of unilateral MCDK and normal bladder US, NM scan may be unnecessary to confirm the diagnosis.

KW - Hydronephrosis

KW - Multicystic dysplastic kidney

KW - Renal ultrasound

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916934930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916934930&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.03.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 24909606

AN - SCOPUS:84916934930

VL - 10

SP - 1059

EP - 1062

JO - Journal of Pediatric Urology

JF - Journal of Pediatric Urology

SN - 1477-5131

IS - 6

ER -