Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration

Impact of immediate cytologic review

Aaron C. Moberly, Emre Vural, Bari Nahas, Tonya Bergeson-Dana, Mimi S. Kokoska

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives/Hypothesis: To compare the diagnostic adequacy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (USFNA) of the head and neck with immediate on-site microscopic evaluation and feedback by a cytopathologist (IMMEDIATE) versus delayed examination without immediate feedback (DELAYED). Study Design: Retrospective chart review of office-based USFNA performed in both IMMEDIATE and DELAYED settings by the same otolaryngologist. Methods: A total of 199 USFNA procedures in the head and neck were performed by one practitioner. Of these procedures, 137 biopsies were performed in the DELAYED setting, whereas 62 biopsies were performed in the IMMEDIATE setting. Cytopathology reports were reviewed for diagnostic conclusions as well as adequacy of biopsies. The results from both settings were compared using Pearson x 2 test. Results: The ability to obtain a diagnosis from USFNA was 73.0% in the DELAYED group as compared with 90.3% in the IMMEDIATE group. The rate of adequate cells on biopsy was 89.1% in the DELAYED group as compared with 96.8% in the IMMEDIATE group. There was a statistically significant difference between observed and expected diagnostic rates (x2[1] = 7.568, P =.006) and a trend toward a significant difference between the observed and expected adequacy rates (x2[1] = 3.259, P = .071) when IMMEDIATE evaluation by a cytopathologist was performed. Conclusions: An immediate microscopic evaluation of USFNA specimens to confirm adequacy of sampling is strongly recommended. Diagnostic conclusions were increased when an evaluation of the specimen was performed at the time of biopsy. The specimen adequacy rate tended to increase with an immediate cytopathologic assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1979-1984
Number of pages6
JournalLaryngoscope
Volume120
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Fine Needle Biopsy
Needles
Biopsy
Neck
Head
Cetirizine
Ultrasonography
Retrospective Studies

Keywords

  • Cytology
  • Diagnosis
  • Head and neck
  • Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration : Impact of immediate cytologic review. / Moberly, Aaron C.; Vural, Emre; Nahas, Bari; Bergeson-Dana, Tonya; Kokoska, Mimi S.

In: Laryngoscope, Vol. 120, No. 10, 10.2010, p. 1979-1984.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Moberly, Aaron C. ; Vural, Emre ; Nahas, Bari ; Bergeson-Dana, Tonya ; Kokoska, Mimi S. / Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration : Impact of immediate cytologic review. In: Laryngoscope. 2010 ; Vol. 120, No. 10. pp. 1979-1984.
@article{30304dabe4ba4a68b5e8d10f22ae92b7,
title = "Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration: Impact of immediate cytologic review",
abstract = "Objectives/Hypothesis: To compare the diagnostic adequacy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (USFNA) of the head and neck with immediate on-site microscopic evaluation and feedback by a cytopathologist (IMMEDIATE) versus delayed examination without immediate feedback (DELAYED). Study Design: Retrospective chart review of office-based USFNA performed in both IMMEDIATE and DELAYED settings by the same otolaryngologist. Methods: A total of 199 USFNA procedures in the head and neck were performed by one practitioner. Of these procedures, 137 biopsies were performed in the DELAYED setting, whereas 62 biopsies were performed in the IMMEDIATE setting. Cytopathology reports were reviewed for diagnostic conclusions as well as adequacy of biopsies. The results from both settings were compared using Pearson x 2 test. Results: The ability to obtain a diagnosis from USFNA was 73.0{\%} in the DELAYED group as compared with 90.3{\%} in the IMMEDIATE group. The rate of adequate cells on biopsy was 89.1{\%} in the DELAYED group as compared with 96.8{\%} in the IMMEDIATE group. There was a statistically significant difference between observed and expected diagnostic rates (x2[1] = 7.568, P =.006) and a trend toward a significant difference between the observed and expected adequacy rates (x2[1] = 3.259, P = .071) when IMMEDIATE evaluation by a cytopathologist was performed. Conclusions: An immediate microscopic evaluation of USFNA specimens to confirm adequacy of sampling is strongly recommended. Diagnostic conclusions were increased when an evaluation of the specimen was performed at the time of biopsy. The specimen adequacy rate tended to increase with an immediate cytopathologic assessment.",
keywords = "Cytology, Diagnosis, Head and neck, Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy",
author = "Moberly, {Aaron C.} and Emre Vural and Bari Nahas and Tonya Bergeson-Dana and Kokoska, {Mimi S.}",
year = "2010",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1002/lary.21061",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "120",
pages = "1979--1984",
journal = "Laryngoscope",
issn = "0023-852X",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration

T2 - Impact of immediate cytologic review

AU - Moberly, Aaron C.

AU - Vural, Emre

AU - Nahas, Bari

AU - Bergeson-Dana, Tonya

AU - Kokoska, Mimi S.

PY - 2010/10

Y1 - 2010/10

N2 - Objectives/Hypothesis: To compare the diagnostic adequacy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (USFNA) of the head and neck with immediate on-site microscopic evaluation and feedback by a cytopathologist (IMMEDIATE) versus delayed examination without immediate feedback (DELAYED). Study Design: Retrospective chart review of office-based USFNA performed in both IMMEDIATE and DELAYED settings by the same otolaryngologist. Methods: A total of 199 USFNA procedures in the head and neck were performed by one practitioner. Of these procedures, 137 biopsies were performed in the DELAYED setting, whereas 62 biopsies were performed in the IMMEDIATE setting. Cytopathology reports were reviewed for diagnostic conclusions as well as adequacy of biopsies. The results from both settings were compared using Pearson x 2 test. Results: The ability to obtain a diagnosis from USFNA was 73.0% in the DELAYED group as compared with 90.3% in the IMMEDIATE group. The rate of adequate cells on biopsy was 89.1% in the DELAYED group as compared with 96.8% in the IMMEDIATE group. There was a statistically significant difference between observed and expected diagnostic rates (x2[1] = 7.568, P =.006) and a trend toward a significant difference between the observed and expected adequacy rates (x2[1] = 3.259, P = .071) when IMMEDIATE evaluation by a cytopathologist was performed. Conclusions: An immediate microscopic evaluation of USFNA specimens to confirm adequacy of sampling is strongly recommended. Diagnostic conclusions were increased when an evaluation of the specimen was performed at the time of biopsy. The specimen adequacy rate tended to increase with an immediate cytopathologic assessment.

AB - Objectives/Hypothesis: To compare the diagnostic adequacy of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (USFNA) of the head and neck with immediate on-site microscopic evaluation and feedback by a cytopathologist (IMMEDIATE) versus delayed examination without immediate feedback (DELAYED). Study Design: Retrospective chart review of office-based USFNA performed in both IMMEDIATE and DELAYED settings by the same otolaryngologist. Methods: A total of 199 USFNA procedures in the head and neck were performed by one practitioner. Of these procedures, 137 biopsies were performed in the DELAYED setting, whereas 62 biopsies were performed in the IMMEDIATE setting. Cytopathology reports were reviewed for diagnostic conclusions as well as adequacy of biopsies. The results from both settings were compared using Pearson x 2 test. Results: The ability to obtain a diagnosis from USFNA was 73.0% in the DELAYED group as compared with 90.3% in the IMMEDIATE group. The rate of adequate cells on biopsy was 89.1% in the DELAYED group as compared with 96.8% in the IMMEDIATE group. There was a statistically significant difference between observed and expected diagnostic rates (x2[1] = 7.568, P =.006) and a trend toward a significant difference between the observed and expected adequacy rates (x2[1] = 3.259, P = .071) when IMMEDIATE evaluation by a cytopathologist was performed. Conclusions: An immediate microscopic evaluation of USFNA specimens to confirm adequacy of sampling is strongly recommended. Diagnostic conclusions were increased when an evaluation of the specimen was performed at the time of biopsy. The specimen adequacy rate tended to increase with an immediate cytopathologic assessment.

KW - Cytology

KW - Diagnosis

KW - Head and neck

KW - Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649894929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649894929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/lary.21061

DO - 10.1002/lary.21061

M3 - Article

VL - 120

SP - 1979

EP - 1984

JO - Laryngoscope

JF - Laryngoscope

SN - 0023-852X

IS - 10

ER -