Understanding and improving the validity of self-report of parenting

Sarah Honaker, Ronald J. Prinz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

101 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although researchers using parental self-report data have questioned its validity (Holden, 2001) and called for more work in this area (Krevans & Gibbs, 1996; Locke & Prinz, 2002), methodological concerns regarding self-report about parenting practices have not been addressed adequately. The susceptibility of parental report to systematic distortions suggests a need for research on ways to improve self-report. This paper attempts to synthesize research findings from other fields (e.g., survey methodology) about ways to improve the validity of self-report, and to discuss the implications for self-report of parenting behaviors. Methods for improving self-report are presented for each of the 5 major tasks in responding to a question: (1) understanding the question, (2) recalling relevant behavior, (3) inference and estimation, (4) mapping the answer onto the response format, and (5) "editing" the answer for reasons of social desirability. Self-administered interviewing, audio-computer-assisted interviewing, pretesting, conversational interviewing, and the decompositional item may be among the best candidates for use in parental self-report. Recommendations are offered with respect to strategies that might prove useful in improving parental assessment of parenting, and to research efforts to evaluate the utility and potential costs of these strategies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-21
Number of pages21
JournalClinical Child and Family Psychology Review
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Self Report
social desirability
candidacy
Research
Social Desirability
methodology
costs
Research Personnel
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Children
  • Parenting
  • Self-report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Understanding and improving the validity of self-report of parenting. / Honaker, Sarah; Prinz, Ronald J.

In: Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 03.2006, p. 1-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b2849b9169b5400ea6dbf63c171760fd,
title = "Understanding and improving the validity of self-report of parenting",
abstract = "Although researchers using parental self-report data have questioned its validity (Holden, 2001) and called for more work in this area (Krevans & Gibbs, 1996; Locke & Prinz, 2002), methodological concerns regarding self-report about parenting practices have not been addressed adequately. The susceptibility of parental report to systematic distortions suggests a need for research on ways to improve self-report. This paper attempts to synthesize research findings from other fields (e.g., survey methodology) about ways to improve the validity of self-report, and to discuss the implications for self-report of parenting behaviors. Methods for improving self-report are presented for each of the 5 major tasks in responding to a question: (1) understanding the question, (2) recalling relevant behavior, (3) inference and estimation, (4) mapping the answer onto the response format, and (5) {"}editing{"} the answer for reasons of social desirability. Self-administered interviewing, audio-computer-assisted interviewing, pretesting, conversational interviewing, and the decompositional item may be among the best candidates for use in parental self-report. Recommendations are offered with respect to strategies that might prove useful in improving parental assessment of parenting, and to research efforts to evaluate the utility and potential costs of these strategies.",
keywords = "Assessment, Children, Parenting, Self-report",
author = "Sarah Honaker and Prinz, {Ronald J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s10567-006-0001-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1--21",
journal = "Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review",
issn = "1096-4037",
publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding and improving the validity of self-report of parenting

AU - Honaker, Sarah

AU - Prinz, Ronald J.

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Although researchers using parental self-report data have questioned its validity (Holden, 2001) and called for more work in this area (Krevans & Gibbs, 1996; Locke & Prinz, 2002), methodological concerns regarding self-report about parenting practices have not been addressed adequately. The susceptibility of parental report to systematic distortions suggests a need for research on ways to improve self-report. This paper attempts to synthesize research findings from other fields (e.g., survey methodology) about ways to improve the validity of self-report, and to discuss the implications for self-report of parenting behaviors. Methods for improving self-report are presented for each of the 5 major tasks in responding to a question: (1) understanding the question, (2) recalling relevant behavior, (3) inference and estimation, (4) mapping the answer onto the response format, and (5) "editing" the answer for reasons of social desirability. Self-administered interviewing, audio-computer-assisted interviewing, pretesting, conversational interviewing, and the decompositional item may be among the best candidates for use in parental self-report. Recommendations are offered with respect to strategies that might prove useful in improving parental assessment of parenting, and to research efforts to evaluate the utility and potential costs of these strategies.

AB - Although researchers using parental self-report data have questioned its validity (Holden, 2001) and called for more work in this area (Krevans & Gibbs, 1996; Locke & Prinz, 2002), methodological concerns regarding self-report about parenting practices have not been addressed adequately. The susceptibility of parental report to systematic distortions suggests a need for research on ways to improve self-report. This paper attempts to synthesize research findings from other fields (e.g., survey methodology) about ways to improve the validity of self-report, and to discuss the implications for self-report of parenting behaviors. Methods for improving self-report are presented for each of the 5 major tasks in responding to a question: (1) understanding the question, (2) recalling relevant behavior, (3) inference and estimation, (4) mapping the answer onto the response format, and (5) "editing" the answer for reasons of social desirability. Self-administered interviewing, audio-computer-assisted interviewing, pretesting, conversational interviewing, and the decompositional item may be among the best candidates for use in parental self-report. Recommendations are offered with respect to strategies that might prove useful in improving parental assessment of parenting, and to research efforts to evaluate the utility and potential costs of these strategies.

KW - Assessment

KW - Children

KW - Parenting

KW - Self-report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747687721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747687721&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10567-006-0001-5

DO - 10.1007/s10567-006-0001-5

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1

EP - 21

JO - Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

JF - Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

SN - 1096-4037

IS - 1

ER -