Understanding Career Success and Its Contributing Factors for Clinical and Translational Investigators

Georgeanna F W B Robinson, Lisa S. Schwartz, Linda DiMeglio, Jasjit S. Ahluwalia, Janice L. Gabrilove

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To understand the factors that facilitate career success for career development awardees in clinical and translational science and reconceptualize understand­ing of career success for this population. METHOD: In 2013–2014, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with former NIH KL2 or K12 scholars from nine Clinical and Translational Science Award–funded institutions. Participants either had or had not secured independent funding at least two years after the end of their last K award. Questions covered the factors that facilitate or hinder junior investigators’ transition to independent funding. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Forty individuals participated, with equal representation by men and women and by independently and not independently funded investigators. Personal factors that facilitated success included networks, persistence and resilience, initiative, autonomy, and personal and professional balance. Organizational factors included appropriate mentorship, protected research time, and institutional resources and support.Even independently funded participants described challenges regarding career direction. Five participants without independent funding modeled a broad spectrum of successful career paths, having assumed leadership positions not reliant on grant funding. Alternative definitions of career success included improving public health, enjoying work, seeing mentees succeed, and receiving external acknowledgment of successes. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the factors that facilitate or hinder career success can help junior faculty, mentors, and institutional leaders support career development in clinical and translational science. New definitions of career success are needed, as are career paths for faculty who want to engage in research in roles other than principal investigator.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAcademic Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 23 2015

Fingerprint

Mentors
Research Personnel
career
Professional Autonomy
Interviews
Personal Autonomy
Organized Financing
Research
funding
Public Health
Population
science
interview
resilience
grant
persistence
public health
autonomy
leadership
leader

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Understanding Career Success and Its Contributing Factors for Clinical and Translational Investigators. / Robinson, Georgeanna F W B; Schwartz, Lisa S.; DiMeglio, Linda; Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.; Gabrilove, Janice L.

In: Academic Medicine, 23.10.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Robinson, Georgeanna F W B ; Schwartz, Lisa S. ; DiMeglio, Linda ; Ahluwalia, Jasjit S. ; Gabrilove, Janice L. / Understanding Career Success and Its Contributing Factors for Clinical and Translational Investigators. In: Academic Medicine. 2015.
@article{ec12b037f39c42fba9b98b4c20329e3c,
title = "Understanding Career Success and Its Contributing Factors for Clinical and Translational Investigators",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To understand the factors that facilitate career success for career development awardees in clinical and translational science and reconceptualize understand­ing of career success for this population. METHOD: In 2013–2014, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with former NIH KL2 or K12 scholars from nine Clinical and Translational Science Award–funded institutions. Participants either had or had not secured independent funding at least two years after the end of their last K award. Questions covered the factors that facilitate or hinder junior investigators’ transition to independent funding. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Forty individuals participated, with equal representation by men and women and by independently and not independently funded investigators. Personal factors that facilitated success included networks, persistence and resilience, initiative, autonomy, and personal and professional balance. Organizational factors included appropriate mentorship, protected research time, and institutional resources and support.Even independently funded participants described challenges regarding career direction. Five participants without independent funding modeled a broad spectrum of successful career paths, having assumed leadership positions not reliant on grant funding. Alternative definitions of career success included improving public health, enjoying work, seeing mentees succeed, and receiving external acknowledgment of successes. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the factors that facilitate or hinder career success can help junior faculty, mentors, and institutional leaders support career development in clinical and translational science. New definitions of career success are needed, as are career paths for faculty who want to engage in research in roles other than principal investigator.",
author = "Robinson, {Georgeanna F W B} and Schwartz, {Lisa S.} and Linda DiMeglio and Ahluwalia, {Jasjit S.} and Gabrilove, {Janice L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000000979",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Career Success and Its Contributing Factors for Clinical and Translational Investigators

AU - Robinson, Georgeanna F W B

AU - Schwartz, Lisa S.

AU - DiMeglio, Linda

AU - Ahluwalia, Jasjit S.

AU - Gabrilove, Janice L.

PY - 2015/10/23

Y1 - 2015/10/23

N2 - PURPOSE: To understand the factors that facilitate career success for career development awardees in clinical and translational science and reconceptualize understand­ing of career success for this population. METHOD: In 2013–2014, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with former NIH KL2 or K12 scholars from nine Clinical and Translational Science Award–funded institutions. Participants either had or had not secured independent funding at least two years after the end of their last K award. Questions covered the factors that facilitate or hinder junior investigators’ transition to independent funding. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Forty individuals participated, with equal representation by men and women and by independently and not independently funded investigators. Personal factors that facilitated success included networks, persistence and resilience, initiative, autonomy, and personal and professional balance. Organizational factors included appropriate mentorship, protected research time, and institutional resources and support.Even independently funded participants described challenges regarding career direction. Five participants without independent funding modeled a broad spectrum of successful career paths, having assumed leadership positions not reliant on grant funding. Alternative definitions of career success included improving public health, enjoying work, seeing mentees succeed, and receiving external acknowledgment of successes. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the factors that facilitate or hinder career success can help junior faculty, mentors, and institutional leaders support career development in clinical and translational science. New definitions of career success are needed, as are career paths for faculty who want to engage in research in roles other than principal investigator.

AB - PURPOSE: To understand the factors that facilitate career success for career development awardees in clinical and translational science and reconceptualize understand­ing of career success for this population. METHOD: In 2013–2014, the authors conducted semistructured interviews with former NIH KL2 or K12 scholars from nine Clinical and Translational Science Award–funded institutions. Participants either had or had not secured independent funding at least two years after the end of their last K award. Questions covered the factors that facilitate or hinder junior investigators’ transition to independent funding. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and the transcripts were analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Forty individuals participated, with equal representation by men and women and by independently and not independently funded investigators. Personal factors that facilitated success included networks, persistence and resilience, initiative, autonomy, and personal and professional balance. Organizational factors included appropriate mentorship, protected research time, and institutional resources and support.Even independently funded participants described challenges regarding career direction. Five participants without independent funding modeled a broad spectrum of successful career paths, having assumed leadership positions not reliant on grant funding. Alternative definitions of career success included improving public health, enjoying work, seeing mentees succeed, and receiving external acknowledgment of successes. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of the factors that facilitate or hinder career success can help junior faculty, mentors, and institutional leaders support career development in clinical and translational science. New definitions of career success are needed, as are career paths for faculty who want to engage in research in roles other than principal investigator.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945553707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945553707&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000979

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000979

M3 - Article

C2 - 26509600

AN - SCOPUS:84945553707

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

ER -