Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain

Laura G. Militello, Shilo Anders, Sarah M. Downs, Julie Diiulio, Elizabeth C. Danielson, Robert W. Hurley, Chris Harle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Chronic pain leads to reduced quality of life for patients, and strains health systems worldwide. In the US and some other countries, the complexities of caring for chronic pain are exacerbated by individual and public health risks associated with commonly used opioid analgesics. To help understand and improve pain care, this article uses the data frame theory of sensemaking to explore how primary care clinicians in the US manage their patients with chronic noncancer pain. We conducted Critical Decision Method interviews with ten primary care clinicians about 30 individual patients with chronic pain. In these interviews, we identified several patients, social/environmental, and clinician factors that influence the frames clinicians use to assess their patients and determine a pain management plan. Findings suggest significant ambiguity and uncertainty in clinical pain management decision making. Therefore, interventions to improve pain care might focus on supporting sensemaking in the context of clinical evidence rather than attempting to provide clinicians with decontextualized and/or algorithm-based decision rules. Interventions might focus on delivering convenient and easily interpreted patient and social/environmental information in the context of clinical practice guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalCognition, Technology and Work
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 30 2018

Fingerprint

Public risks
Health risks
Public health
Decision making
Health
Chronic Pain
Primary Care
Clinicians
Pain
Uncertainty
Sensemaking

Keywords

  • Chronic pain
  • Decision making
  • Health
  • Opioids
  • Primary care
  • Sensemaking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Computer Science Applications

Cite this

Militello, L. G., Anders, S., Downs, S. M., Diiulio, J., Danielson, E. C., Hurley, R. W., & Harle, C. (Accepted/In press). Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain. Cognition, Technology and Work, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0491-1

Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain. / Militello, Laura G.; Anders, Shilo; Downs, Sarah M.; Diiulio, Julie; Danielson, Elizabeth C.; Hurley, Robert W.; Harle, Chris.

In: Cognition, Technology and Work, 30.05.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Militello LG, Anders S, Downs SM, Diiulio J, Danielson EC, Hurley RW et al. Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain. Cognition, Technology and Work. 2018 May 30;1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-018-0491-1
Militello, Laura G. ; Anders, Shilo ; Downs, Sarah M. ; Diiulio, Julie ; Danielson, Elizabeth C. ; Hurley, Robert W. ; Harle, Chris. / Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain. In: Cognition, Technology and Work. 2018 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{9b99851cbc844b25843509f10cd72bae,
title = "Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain",
abstract = "Chronic pain leads to reduced quality of life for patients, and strains health systems worldwide. In the US and some other countries, the complexities of caring for chronic pain are exacerbated by individual and public health risks associated with commonly used opioid analgesics. To help understand and improve pain care, this article uses the data frame theory of sensemaking to explore how primary care clinicians in the US manage their patients with chronic noncancer pain. We conducted Critical Decision Method interviews with ten primary care clinicians about 30 individual patients with chronic pain. In these interviews, we identified several patients, social/environmental, and clinician factors that influence the frames clinicians use to assess their patients and determine a pain management plan. Findings suggest significant ambiguity and uncertainty in clinical pain management decision making. Therefore, interventions to improve pain care might focus on supporting sensemaking in the context of clinical evidence rather than attempting to provide clinicians with decontextualized and/or algorithm-based decision rules. Interventions might focus on delivering convenient and easily interpreted patient and social/environmental information in the context of clinical practice guidelines.",
keywords = "Chronic pain, Decision making, Health, Opioids, Primary care, Sensemaking",
author = "Militello, {Laura G.} and Shilo Anders and Downs, {Sarah M.} and Julie Diiulio and Danielson, {Elizabeth C.} and Hurley, {Robert W.} and Chris Harle",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s10111-018-0491-1",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Cognition, Technology and Work",
issn = "1435-5558",
publisher = "Springer London",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain

AU - Militello, Laura G.

AU - Anders, Shilo

AU - Downs, Sarah M.

AU - Diiulio, Julie

AU - Danielson, Elizabeth C.

AU - Hurley, Robert W.

AU - Harle, Chris

PY - 2018/5/30

Y1 - 2018/5/30

N2 - Chronic pain leads to reduced quality of life for patients, and strains health systems worldwide. In the US and some other countries, the complexities of caring for chronic pain are exacerbated by individual and public health risks associated with commonly used opioid analgesics. To help understand and improve pain care, this article uses the data frame theory of sensemaking to explore how primary care clinicians in the US manage their patients with chronic noncancer pain. We conducted Critical Decision Method interviews with ten primary care clinicians about 30 individual patients with chronic pain. In these interviews, we identified several patients, social/environmental, and clinician factors that influence the frames clinicians use to assess their patients and determine a pain management plan. Findings suggest significant ambiguity and uncertainty in clinical pain management decision making. Therefore, interventions to improve pain care might focus on supporting sensemaking in the context of clinical evidence rather than attempting to provide clinicians with decontextualized and/or algorithm-based decision rules. Interventions might focus on delivering convenient and easily interpreted patient and social/environmental information in the context of clinical practice guidelines.

AB - Chronic pain leads to reduced quality of life for patients, and strains health systems worldwide. In the US and some other countries, the complexities of caring for chronic pain are exacerbated by individual and public health risks associated with commonly used opioid analgesics. To help understand and improve pain care, this article uses the data frame theory of sensemaking to explore how primary care clinicians in the US manage their patients with chronic noncancer pain. We conducted Critical Decision Method interviews with ten primary care clinicians about 30 individual patients with chronic pain. In these interviews, we identified several patients, social/environmental, and clinician factors that influence the frames clinicians use to assess their patients and determine a pain management plan. Findings suggest significant ambiguity and uncertainty in clinical pain management decision making. Therefore, interventions to improve pain care might focus on supporting sensemaking in the context of clinical evidence rather than attempting to provide clinicians with decontextualized and/or algorithm-based decision rules. Interventions might focus on delivering convenient and easily interpreted patient and social/environmental information in the context of clinical practice guidelines.

KW - Chronic pain

KW - Decision making

KW - Health

KW - Opioids

KW - Primary care

KW - Sensemaking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047782892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047782892&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10111-018-0491-1

DO - 10.1007/s10111-018-0491-1

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Cognition, Technology and Work

JF - Cognition, Technology and Work

SN - 1435-5558

ER -