Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills

Marc Marschark, Linda J. Spencer, Andreana Durkin, Georgianna Borgna, Carol Convertino, Elizabeth Machmer, William Kronenberger, Alexandra Trani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is frequently assumed that deaf individuals have superior visual-spatial abilities relative to hearing peers and thus, in educational settings, they are often considered visual learners. There is some empirical evidence to support the former assumption, although it is inconsistent, and apparently none to support the latter. Three experiments examined visualspatial and related cognitive abilities among deaf individuals who varied in their preferred language modality and use of cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing individuals who varied in their sign language skills. Sign language and spoken language assessments accompanied tasks involving visual-spatial processing, working memory, nonverbal logical reasoning, and executive function. Results were consistent with other recent studies indicating no generalized visual-spatial advantage for deaf individuals and suggested that their performance in that domain may be linked to the strength of their preferred language skills regardless of modality. Hearing individuals performed more strongly than deaf individuals on several visual-spatial and self-reported executive functioning measures, regardless of sign language skills or use of CIs. Findings are inconsistent with assumptions that deaf individuals are visual learners or are superior to hearing individuals across a broad range of visual-spatial tasks. Further, performance of deaf and hearing individuals on the same visual-spatial tasks was associated with differing cognitive abilities, suggesting that different cognitive processes may be involved in visualspatial processing in these groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)310-330
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Hearing
Sign Language
Language
language
Aptitude
Cochlear Implants
cognitive ability
Executive Function
Short-Term Memory
educational setting
spoken language
performance
experiment
ability
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Marschark, M., Spencer, L. J., Durkin, A., Borgna, G., Convertino, C., Machmer, E., ... Trani, A. (2015). Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 20(4), 310-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env025

Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills. / Marschark, Marc; Spencer, Linda J.; Durkin, Andreana; Borgna, Georgianna; Convertino, Carol; Machmer, Elizabeth; Kronenberger, William; Trani, Alexandra.

In: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, Vol. 20, No. 4, 01.10.2015, p. 310-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marschark, M, Spencer, LJ, Durkin, A, Borgna, G, Convertino, C, Machmer, E, Kronenberger, W & Trani, A 2015, 'Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills', Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 310-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env025
Marschark M, Spencer LJ, Durkin A, Borgna G, Convertino C, Machmer E et al. Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2015 Oct 1;20(4):310-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/env025
Marschark, Marc ; Spencer, Linda J. ; Durkin, Andreana ; Borgna, Georgianna ; Convertino, Carol ; Machmer, Elizabeth ; Kronenberger, William ; Trani, Alexandra. / Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills. In: Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education. 2015 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 310-330.
@article{b37b567eb51a4e0c84fe6faa4a8170a6,
title = "Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills",
abstract = "It is frequently assumed that deaf individuals have superior visual-spatial abilities relative to hearing peers and thus, in educational settings, they are often considered visual learners. There is some empirical evidence to support the former assumption, although it is inconsistent, and apparently none to support the latter. Three experiments examined visualspatial and related cognitive abilities among deaf individuals who varied in their preferred language modality and use of cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing individuals who varied in their sign language skills. Sign language and spoken language assessments accompanied tasks involving visual-spatial processing, working memory, nonverbal logical reasoning, and executive function. Results were consistent with other recent studies indicating no generalized visual-spatial advantage for deaf individuals and suggested that their performance in that domain may be linked to the strength of their preferred language skills regardless of modality. Hearing individuals performed more strongly than deaf individuals on several visual-spatial and self-reported executive functioning measures, regardless of sign language skills or use of CIs. Findings are inconsistent with assumptions that deaf individuals are visual learners or are superior to hearing individuals across a broad range of visual-spatial tasks. Further, performance of deaf and hearing individuals on the same visual-spatial tasks was associated with differing cognitive abilities, suggesting that different cognitive processes may be involved in visualspatial processing in these groups.",
author = "Marc Marschark and Spencer, {Linda J.} and Andreana Durkin and Georgianna Borgna and Carol Convertino and Elizabeth Machmer and William Kronenberger and Alexandra Trani",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/deafed/env025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "310--330",
journal = "Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education",
issn = "1081-4159",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding language, hearing status, and visual-spatial skills

AU - Marschark, Marc

AU - Spencer, Linda J.

AU - Durkin, Andreana

AU - Borgna, Georgianna

AU - Convertino, Carol

AU - Machmer, Elizabeth

AU - Kronenberger, William

AU - Trani, Alexandra

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - It is frequently assumed that deaf individuals have superior visual-spatial abilities relative to hearing peers and thus, in educational settings, they are often considered visual learners. There is some empirical evidence to support the former assumption, although it is inconsistent, and apparently none to support the latter. Three experiments examined visualspatial and related cognitive abilities among deaf individuals who varied in their preferred language modality and use of cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing individuals who varied in their sign language skills. Sign language and spoken language assessments accompanied tasks involving visual-spatial processing, working memory, nonverbal logical reasoning, and executive function. Results were consistent with other recent studies indicating no generalized visual-spatial advantage for deaf individuals and suggested that their performance in that domain may be linked to the strength of their preferred language skills regardless of modality. Hearing individuals performed more strongly than deaf individuals on several visual-spatial and self-reported executive functioning measures, regardless of sign language skills or use of CIs. Findings are inconsistent with assumptions that deaf individuals are visual learners or are superior to hearing individuals across a broad range of visual-spatial tasks. Further, performance of deaf and hearing individuals on the same visual-spatial tasks was associated with differing cognitive abilities, suggesting that different cognitive processes may be involved in visualspatial processing in these groups.

AB - It is frequently assumed that deaf individuals have superior visual-spatial abilities relative to hearing peers and thus, in educational settings, they are often considered visual learners. There is some empirical evidence to support the former assumption, although it is inconsistent, and apparently none to support the latter. Three experiments examined visualspatial and related cognitive abilities among deaf individuals who varied in their preferred language modality and use of cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing individuals who varied in their sign language skills. Sign language and spoken language assessments accompanied tasks involving visual-spatial processing, working memory, nonverbal logical reasoning, and executive function. Results were consistent with other recent studies indicating no generalized visual-spatial advantage for deaf individuals and suggested that their performance in that domain may be linked to the strength of their preferred language skills regardless of modality. Hearing individuals performed more strongly than deaf individuals on several visual-spatial and self-reported executive functioning measures, regardless of sign language skills or use of CIs. Findings are inconsistent with assumptions that deaf individuals are visual learners or are superior to hearing individuals across a broad range of visual-spatial tasks. Further, performance of deaf and hearing individuals on the same visual-spatial tasks was associated with differing cognitive abilities, suggesting that different cognitive processes may be involved in visualspatial processing in these groups.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943747572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943747572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/deafed/env025

DO - 10.1093/deafed/env025

M3 - Article

C2 - 26141071

AN - SCOPUS:84943747572

VL - 20

SP - 310

EP - 330

JO - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

JF - Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education

SN - 1081-4159

IS - 4

ER -