Update on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has been increasingly standardized over the years and has evolved to incorporate new diagnostic modalities. The gold standard for diagnosing multiple sclerosis remains clinical, with dissemination of typical white matter symptoms and signs in time and space. The Schumacher criteria in 1965 attempted to standardize clinical criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis. The Poser criteria in 1983 added evoked potential and cerebrospinal parameters and the McDonald criteria in 2001 added MRI parameters. All criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis include the caveat that no alternative diagnosis better explains the clinical picture, making the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis critical. Recent availability of first generation immunotherapies for MS has increased pressure to make an early and accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and to use the diagnostic work-up to try to prognosticate a future disease course.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)319-327
Number of pages9
JournalExpert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Multiple Sclerosis
Evoked Potentials
Immunotherapy
Signs and Symptoms
Early Diagnosis
Differential Diagnosis
Pressure

Keywords

  • Cerebrospinal fluid
  • Clinical gold standard
  • Diagnostic work-up
  • Differential diagnosis
  • Evoked potentials
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Oligoclonal IgC bands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Update on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. / Mattson, David.

In: Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2002, p. 319-327.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7780331cbe1e4119a60c14a7fe47be1a,
title = "Update on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis",
abstract = "The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has been increasingly standardized over the years and has evolved to incorporate new diagnostic modalities. The gold standard for diagnosing multiple sclerosis remains clinical, with dissemination of typical white matter symptoms and signs in time and space. The Schumacher criteria in 1965 attempted to standardize clinical criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis. The Poser criteria in 1983 added evoked potential and cerebrospinal parameters and the McDonald criteria in 2001 added MRI parameters. All criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis include the caveat that no alternative diagnosis better explains the clinical picture, making the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis critical. Recent availability of first generation immunotherapies for MS has increased pressure to make an early and accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and to use the diagnostic work-up to try to prognosticate a future disease course.",
keywords = "Cerebrospinal fluid, Clinical gold standard, Diagnostic work-up, Differential diagnosis, Evoked potentials, Magnetic resonance imaging, Multiple sclerosis, Oligoclonal IgC bands",
author = "David Mattson",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1586/14737175.2.3.319",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "319--327",
journal = "Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics",
issn = "1473-7175",
publisher = "Expert Reviews Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Update on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis

AU - Mattson, David

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has been increasingly standardized over the years and has evolved to incorporate new diagnostic modalities. The gold standard for diagnosing multiple sclerosis remains clinical, with dissemination of typical white matter symptoms and signs in time and space. The Schumacher criteria in 1965 attempted to standardize clinical criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis. The Poser criteria in 1983 added evoked potential and cerebrospinal parameters and the McDonald criteria in 2001 added MRI parameters. All criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis include the caveat that no alternative diagnosis better explains the clinical picture, making the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis critical. Recent availability of first generation immunotherapies for MS has increased pressure to make an early and accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and to use the diagnostic work-up to try to prognosticate a future disease course.

AB - The diagnosis of multiple sclerosis has been increasingly standardized over the years and has evolved to incorporate new diagnostic modalities. The gold standard for diagnosing multiple sclerosis remains clinical, with dissemination of typical white matter symptoms and signs in time and space. The Schumacher criteria in 1965 attempted to standardize clinical criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis. The Poser criteria in 1983 added evoked potential and cerebrospinal parameters and the McDonald criteria in 2001 added MRI parameters. All criteria for diagnosing multiple sclerosis include the caveat that no alternative diagnosis better explains the clinical picture, making the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis critical. Recent availability of first generation immunotherapies for MS has increased pressure to make an early and accurate diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and to use the diagnostic work-up to try to prognosticate a future disease course.

KW - Cerebrospinal fluid

KW - Clinical gold standard

KW - Diagnostic work-up

KW - Differential diagnosis

KW - Evoked potentials

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Multiple sclerosis

KW - Oligoclonal IgC bands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036282818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036282818&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1586/14737175.2.3.319

DO - 10.1586/14737175.2.3.319

M3 - Article

C2 - 19810863

AN - SCOPUS:0036282818

VL - 2

SP - 319

EP - 327

JO - Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

JF - Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

SN - 1473-7175

IS - 3

ER -