Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy

Christopher L. Coogan, J. Samuel Little, Richard Bihrle, Richard Foster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives. To investigate the feasibility of early catheter removal following radical prostatectomy. Methods. Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy, with intent of early catheter removal. Catheter removal was based on postoperative cystograms performed on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and patients were contacted by phone and specifically questioned regarding continence and bladder control. Results. Fifty-one patients (87.9%) had a cystogram performed on POD 3 or 4. In 43 patients (74.1%), the catheter was successfully removed prior to hospital discharge. Eight patients experienced either early or late complications (excluding incontinence); these included 3 patients with a superficial wound infection, 2 patients with hematuria requiring reinsertion of a urethral catheter, 1 patient with a spontaneous pneumothorax, 1 patient who developed a deep vein thrombosis and lymphocele, and 1 patient with a bladder neck contracture. Urinary continence was reported as excellent to good in 86% of the patients at a mean follow-up of 17.4 months. Three patients (5%) underwent placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. Conclusions. Catheter removal prior to hospital discharge after radical prostatectomy is feasible without any increase in morbidity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)400-403
Number of pages4
JournalUrology
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1997

Fingerprint

Urinary Catheters
Prostatectomy
Catheters
Urinary Bladder
Artificial Urinary Sphincter
Lymphocele
Contracture
Hematuria
Pneumothorax
Wound Infection
Venous Thrombosis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy. / Coogan, Christopher L.; Little, J. Samuel; Bihrle, Richard; Foster, Richard.

In: Urology, Vol. 49, No. 3, 05.1997, p. 400-403.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coogan, Christopher L. ; Little, J. Samuel ; Bihrle, Richard ; Foster, Richard. / Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy. In: Urology. 1997 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 400-403.
@article{54330143682d4a1f851c365b9b3aec0e,
title = "Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy",
abstract = "Objectives. To investigate the feasibility of early catheter removal following radical prostatectomy. Methods. Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy, with intent of early catheter removal. Catheter removal was based on postoperative cystograms performed on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and patients were contacted by phone and specifically questioned regarding continence and bladder control. Results. Fifty-one patients (87.9{\%}) had a cystogram performed on POD 3 or 4. In 43 patients (74.1{\%}), the catheter was successfully removed prior to hospital discharge. Eight patients experienced either early or late complications (excluding incontinence); these included 3 patients with a superficial wound infection, 2 patients with hematuria requiring reinsertion of a urethral catheter, 1 patient with a spontaneous pneumothorax, 1 patient who developed a deep vein thrombosis and lymphocele, and 1 patient with a bladder neck contracture. Urinary continence was reported as excellent to good in 86{\%} of the patients at a mean follow-up of 17.4 months. Three patients (5{\%}) underwent placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. Conclusions. Catheter removal prior to hospital discharge after radical prostatectomy is feasible without any increase in morbidity.",
author = "Coogan, {Christopher L.} and Little, {J. Samuel} and Richard Bihrle and Richard Foster",
year = "1997",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00491-8",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "400--403",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urethral catheter removal prior to hospital discharge following radical prostatectomy

AU - Coogan, Christopher L.

AU - Little, J. Samuel

AU - Bihrle, Richard

AU - Foster, Richard

PY - 1997/5

Y1 - 1997/5

N2 - Objectives. To investigate the feasibility of early catheter removal following radical prostatectomy. Methods. Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy, with intent of early catheter removal. Catheter removal was based on postoperative cystograms performed on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and patients were contacted by phone and specifically questioned regarding continence and bladder control. Results. Fifty-one patients (87.9%) had a cystogram performed on POD 3 or 4. In 43 patients (74.1%), the catheter was successfully removed prior to hospital discharge. Eight patients experienced either early or late complications (excluding incontinence); these included 3 patients with a superficial wound infection, 2 patients with hematuria requiring reinsertion of a urethral catheter, 1 patient with a spontaneous pneumothorax, 1 patient who developed a deep vein thrombosis and lymphocele, and 1 patient with a bladder neck contracture. Urinary continence was reported as excellent to good in 86% of the patients at a mean follow-up of 17.4 months. Three patients (5%) underwent placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. Conclusions. Catheter removal prior to hospital discharge after radical prostatectomy is feasible without any increase in morbidity.

AB - Objectives. To investigate the feasibility of early catheter removal following radical prostatectomy. Methods. Fifty-eight consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy, with intent of early catheter removal. Catheter removal was based on postoperative cystograms performed on postoperative day (POD) 3 or 4. Charts were retrospectively reviewed and patients were contacted by phone and specifically questioned regarding continence and bladder control. Results. Fifty-one patients (87.9%) had a cystogram performed on POD 3 or 4. In 43 patients (74.1%), the catheter was successfully removed prior to hospital discharge. Eight patients experienced either early or late complications (excluding incontinence); these included 3 patients with a superficial wound infection, 2 patients with hematuria requiring reinsertion of a urethral catheter, 1 patient with a spontaneous pneumothorax, 1 patient who developed a deep vein thrombosis and lymphocele, and 1 patient with a bladder neck contracture. Urinary continence was reported as excellent to good in 86% of the patients at a mean follow-up of 17.4 months. Three patients (5%) underwent placement of an artificial urinary sphincter. Conclusions. Catheter removal prior to hospital discharge after radical prostatectomy is feasible without any increase in morbidity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030888160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030888160&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00491-8

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00491-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 9123705

AN - SCOPUS:0030888160

VL - 49

SP - 400

EP - 403

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 3

ER -