Urinary solute transport by gastricmucosa: A comparison with ileum using a rat model

Roy Abrandell, Renato Scaletscky, Michael Koch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to quantitate and compare urinary solute transport by stomach and ileum using an in vivo rat model. Methods: An artificial urine solution was perfused through isolated gastric and ilealsegments in the anesthetized rat. Concentrations of solutes and a volume marker were periodically determined in the perfusate and net solute flux was calculated. Results: The stomach secretes less sodium and very little bicarbonate in comparisonwith ileum. Hydrogen ion and chloride are absorbed by ileum but secreted in large quantities by the stomach. Ammonium, potassium, and urea are absorbed by both segments but to a much lesser degree in the stomach. Overall, there was a net osmolar absorption by ileum, and a net secretion by the stomach. Both segments secrete water to a similar degree. Conclusions: These findings both suggest the mechanism of the hypochloremic metabolicalkalosis seen after urinary reconstruction with the stomach and provide insight into potential therapeutic approaches. Solute fluxes in both the stomach and the ileum are consistent with the known physiology of these segments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)343-347
Number of pages5
JournalUrology
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ileum
Stomach
Hydrochloric Acid
Bicarbonates
Ammonium Compounds
Urea
Protons
Potassium
Sodium
Urine
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Urinary solute transport by gastricmucosa : A comparison with ileum using a rat model. / Abrandell, Roy; Scaletscky, Renato; Koch, Michael.

In: Urology, Vol. 44, No. 3, 1994, p. 343-347.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abrandell, Roy ; Scaletscky, Renato ; Koch, Michael. / Urinary solute transport by gastricmucosa : A comparison with ileum using a rat model. In: Urology. 1994 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 343-347.
@article{a66e2d80e1a8441bab1970eeb0d9f8a0,
title = "Urinary solute transport by gastricmucosa: A comparison with ileum using a rat model",
abstract = "Objectives: This study was conducted to quantitate and compare urinary solute transport by stomach and ileum using an in vivo rat model. Methods: An artificial urine solution was perfused through isolated gastric and ilealsegments in the anesthetized rat. Concentrations of solutes and a volume marker were periodically determined in the perfusate and net solute flux was calculated. Results: The stomach secretes less sodium and very little bicarbonate in comparisonwith ileum. Hydrogen ion and chloride are absorbed by ileum but secreted in large quantities by the stomach. Ammonium, potassium, and urea are absorbed by both segments but to a much lesser degree in the stomach. Overall, there was a net osmolar absorption by ileum, and a net secretion by the stomach. Both segments secrete water to a similar degree. Conclusions: These findings both suggest the mechanism of the hypochloremic metabolicalkalosis seen after urinary reconstruction with the stomach and provide insight into potential therapeutic approaches. Solute fluxes in both the stomach and the ileum are consistent with the known physiology of these segments.",
author = "Roy Abrandell and Renato Scaletscky and Michael Koch",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80091-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "343--347",
journal = "Urology",
issn = "0090-4295",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Urinary solute transport by gastricmucosa

T2 - A comparison with ileum using a rat model

AU - Abrandell, Roy

AU - Scaletscky, Renato

AU - Koch, Michael

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Objectives: This study was conducted to quantitate and compare urinary solute transport by stomach and ileum using an in vivo rat model. Methods: An artificial urine solution was perfused through isolated gastric and ilealsegments in the anesthetized rat. Concentrations of solutes and a volume marker were periodically determined in the perfusate and net solute flux was calculated. Results: The stomach secretes less sodium and very little bicarbonate in comparisonwith ileum. Hydrogen ion and chloride are absorbed by ileum but secreted in large quantities by the stomach. Ammonium, potassium, and urea are absorbed by both segments but to a much lesser degree in the stomach. Overall, there was a net osmolar absorption by ileum, and a net secretion by the stomach. Both segments secrete water to a similar degree. Conclusions: These findings both suggest the mechanism of the hypochloremic metabolicalkalosis seen after urinary reconstruction with the stomach and provide insight into potential therapeutic approaches. Solute fluxes in both the stomach and the ileum are consistent with the known physiology of these segments.

AB - Objectives: This study was conducted to quantitate and compare urinary solute transport by stomach and ileum using an in vivo rat model. Methods: An artificial urine solution was perfused through isolated gastric and ilealsegments in the anesthetized rat. Concentrations of solutes and a volume marker were periodically determined in the perfusate and net solute flux was calculated. Results: The stomach secretes less sodium and very little bicarbonate in comparisonwith ileum. Hydrogen ion and chloride are absorbed by ileum but secreted in large quantities by the stomach. Ammonium, potassium, and urea are absorbed by both segments but to a much lesser degree in the stomach. Overall, there was a net osmolar absorption by ileum, and a net secretion by the stomach. Both segments secrete water to a similar degree. Conclusions: These findings both suggest the mechanism of the hypochloremic metabolicalkalosis seen after urinary reconstruction with the stomach and provide insight into potential therapeutic approaches. Solute fluxes in both the stomach and the ileum are consistent with the known physiology of these segments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028016348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028016348&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80091-X

DO - 10.1016/S0090-4295(94)80091-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 8073550

AN - SCOPUS:0028016348

VL - 44

SP - 343

EP - 347

JO - Urology

JF - Urology

SN - 0090-4295

IS - 3

ER -