Use of non-mammalian alternative models for neurotoxicological study

Randall T. Peterson, Richard Nass, Windy A. Boyd, Jonathan H. Freedman, Ke Dong, Toshio Narahashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

122 Scopus citations


The field of neurotoxicology needs to satisfy two opposing demands: the testing of a growing list of chemicals, and resource limitations and ethical concerns associated with testing using traditional mammalian species. National and international government agencies have defined a need to reduce, refine or replace mammalian species in toxicological testing with alternative testing methods and non-mammalian models. Toxicological assays using alternative animal models may relieve some of this pressure by allowing testing of more compounds while reducing expense and using fewer mammals. Recent advances in genetic technologies and the strong conservation between human and non-mammalian genomes allow for the dissection of the molecular pathways involved in neurotoxicological responses and neurological diseases using genetically tractable organisms. In this review, applications of four non-mammalian species, zebrafish, cockroach, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans, in the investigation of neurotoxicology and neurological diseases are presented.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)546-555
Number of pages10
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2008


  • C. elegans
  • Insecticides
  • Insects
  • Neurotoxicological studies
  • Parkinson's
  • Zebrafish

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Toxicology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Use of non-mammalian alternative models for neurotoxicological study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Peterson, R. T., Nass, R., Boyd, W. A., Freedman, J. H., Dong, K., & Narahashi, T. (2008). Use of non-mammalian alternative models for neurotoxicological study. NeuroToxicology, 29(3), 546-555.