Usefulness of the ΔHA interval to accurately distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentry from orthodromic septal bypass tract tachycardias

John Miller, Mark E. Rosenthal, Charles D. Gottlieb, Joseph A. Vassallo, Mark E. Josephson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Surface electrocardiographic criteria may be inadequate to distinguish some cases of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from those with orthodromic SVT incorporating a posterior septal bypass tract (orthodromic SVT) because of similarities in P-wave morphology and timing during SVT. Invasive electrophysiologic studies may occasionally leave uncertainty in the correct diagnosis, using currently accepted criteria. A new criterion for distinguishing these 2 forms of SVT was therefore devised and tested based on differences in the sequence of activation of the His bundle and atrium during SVT and ventricular pacing. Eighty-four patients underwent invasive electrophysiologic studies (60 with proved AV nodal SVT, 24 with proved orthodromic SVT), during which His to atrial (HA) intervals were measured during SVT as well as ventricular pacing at the same rate. The newly devised criterion, the delta HA interval (HApace - HAsvt) was found to accurately distinguish AV nodal SVT (ΔHA >0 ms) from orthodromic SVT (ΔHA <-27 ms). An intermediate value of ΔHA = -10 ms was chosen which had a 100% sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy in differentiating the 2 forms of SVT. A clear retrograde His potential during ventricular pacing, which is essential for application of this criterion, was present in 78 of 84 (93%) cases. In summary, patients with ΔHA intervals >-10 ms separate AV nodal reentry from orthodromic SVT incorporating a septal bypass tract, and no overlap exists between the 2 groups. This criterion may be useful in differentiating the mechanism of SVT in cases in which distinction is not possible by other methods.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1037-1044
Number of pages8
JournalThe American Journal of Cardiology
Volume68
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 15 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Supraventricular Tachycardia
Tachycardia
Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry Tachycardia
Bundle of His
Uncertainty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Usefulness of the ΔHA interval to accurately distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentry from orthodromic septal bypass tract tachycardias. / Miller, John; Rosenthal, Mark E.; Gottlieb, Charles D.; Vassallo, Joseph A.; Josephson, Mark E.

In: The American Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 68, No. 10, 15.10.1991, p. 1037-1044.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Miller, John ; Rosenthal, Mark E. ; Gottlieb, Charles D. ; Vassallo, Joseph A. ; Josephson, Mark E. / Usefulness of the ΔHA interval to accurately distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentry from orthodromic septal bypass tract tachycardias. In: The American Journal of Cardiology. 1991 ; Vol. 68, No. 10. pp. 1037-1044.
@article{d5a07087bcde4ea598a8000e15702570,
title = "Usefulness of the ΔHA interval to accurately distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentry from orthodromic septal bypass tract tachycardias",
abstract = "Surface electrocardiographic criteria may be inadequate to distinguish some cases of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from those with orthodromic SVT incorporating a posterior septal bypass tract (orthodromic SVT) because of similarities in P-wave morphology and timing during SVT. Invasive electrophysiologic studies may occasionally leave uncertainty in the correct diagnosis, using currently accepted criteria. A new criterion for distinguishing these 2 forms of SVT was therefore devised and tested based on differences in the sequence of activation of the His bundle and atrium during SVT and ventricular pacing. Eighty-four patients underwent invasive electrophysiologic studies (60 with proved AV nodal SVT, 24 with proved orthodromic SVT), during which His to atrial (HA) intervals were measured during SVT as well as ventricular pacing at the same rate. The newly devised criterion, the delta HA interval (HApace - HAsvt) was found to accurately distinguish AV nodal SVT (ΔHA >0 ms) from orthodromic SVT (ΔHA <-27 ms). An intermediate value of ΔHA = -10 ms was chosen which had a 100{\%} sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy in differentiating the 2 forms of SVT. A clear retrograde His potential during ventricular pacing, which is essential for application of this criterion, was present in 78 of 84 (93{\%}) cases. In summary, patients with ΔHA intervals >-10 ms separate AV nodal reentry from orthodromic SVT incorporating a septal bypass tract, and no overlap exists between the 2 groups. This criterion may be useful in differentiating the mechanism of SVT in cases in which distinction is not possible by other methods.",
author = "John Miller and Rosenthal, {Mark E.} and Gottlieb, {Charles D.} and Vassallo, {Joseph A.} and Josephson, {Mark E.}",
year = "1991",
month = "10",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/0002-9149(91)90492-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "1037--1044",
journal = "American Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0002-9149",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Usefulness of the ΔHA interval to accurately distinguish atrioventricular nodal reentry from orthodromic septal bypass tract tachycardias

AU - Miller, John

AU - Rosenthal, Mark E.

AU - Gottlieb, Charles D.

AU - Vassallo, Joseph A.

AU - Josephson, Mark E.

PY - 1991/10/15

Y1 - 1991/10/15

N2 - Surface electrocardiographic criteria may be inadequate to distinguish some cases of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from those with orthodromic SVT incorporating a posterior septal bypass tract (orthodromic SVT) because of similarities in P-wave morphology and timing during SVT. Invasive electrophysiologic studies may occasionally leave uncertainty in the correct diagnosis, using currently accepted criteria. A new criterion for distinguishing these 2 forms of SVT was therefore devised and tested based on differences in the sequence of activation of the His bundle and atrium during SVT and ventricular pacing. Eighty-four patients underwent invasive electrophysiologic studies (60 with proved AV nodal SVT, 24 with proved orthodromic SVT), during which His to atrial (HA) intervals were measured during SVT as well as ventricular pacing at the same rate. The newly devised criterion, the delta HA interval (HApace - HAsvt) was found to accurately distinguish AV nodal SVT (ΔHA >0 ms) from orthodromic SVT (ΔHA <-27 ms). An intermediate value of ΔHA = -10 ms was chosen which had a 100% sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy in differentiating the 2 forms of SVT. A clear retrograde His potential during ventricular pacing, which is essential for application of this criterion, was present in 78 of 84 (93%) cases. In summary, patients with ΔHA intervals >-10 ms separate AV nodal reentry from orthodromic SVT incorporating a septal bypass tract, and no overlap exists between the 2 groups. This criterion may be useful in differentiating the mechanism of SVT in cases in which distinction is not possible by other methods.

AB - Surface electrocardiographic criteria may be inadequate to distinguish some cases of atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) from those with orthodromic SVT incorporating a posterior septal bypass tract (orthodromic SVT) because of similarities in P-wave morphology and timing during SVT. Invasive electrophysiologic studies may occasionally leave uncertainty in the correct diagnosis, using currently accepted criteria. A new criterion for distinguishing these 2 forms of SVT was therefore devised and tested based on differences in the sequence of activation of the His bundle and atrium during SVT and ventricular pacing. Eighty-four patients underwent invasive electrophysiologic studies (60 with proved AV nodal SVT, 24 with proved orthodromic SVT), during which His to atrial (HA) intervals were measured during SVT as well as ventricular pacing at the same rate. The newly devised criterion, the delta HA interval (HApace - HAsvt) was found to accurately distinguish AV nodal SVT (ΔHA >0 ms) from orthodromic SVT (ΔHA <-27 ms). An intermediate value of ΔHA = -10 ms was chosen which had a 100% sensitivity, specificity and predictive accuracy in differentiating the 2 forms of SVT. A clear retrograde His potential during ventricular pacing, which is essential for application of this criterion, was present in 78 of 84 (93%) cases. In summary, patients with ΔHA intervals >-10 ms separate AV nodal reentry from orthodromic SVT incorporating a septal bypass tract, and no overlap exists between the 2 groups. This criterion may be useful in differentiating the mechanism of SVT in cases in which distinction is not possible by other methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025996517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025996517&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90492-4

DO - 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90492-4

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 1037

EP - 1044

JO - American Journal of Cardiology

JF - American Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0002-9149

IS - 10

ER -