Using an FSDS-R Item to Screen for Sexually Related Distress: A MsFLASH Analysis

Janet Carpenter, Susan D. Reed, Katherine A. Guthrie, Joseph C. Larson, Katherine M. Newton, R. Jane Lau, Lee A. Learman, Jan L. Shifren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) was created and validated to assess distress associated with impaired sexual function, but it is lengthy for use in clinical practice and research when assessing sexual function is not a primary objective. Aim: The study aims to evaluate whether a single item from the FSDS-R could be identified to use to screen midlife women for bothersome diminution in sexual function based on three criteria: (i) highly correlated with total scores; (ii) correlated with commonly assessed domains of female sexual functioning; and (iii) able to differentiate between women reporting high and low sexual concerns during the prior month. Methods: Data from 93 midlife women were collected by the Menopause Strategies Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health (MsFLASH) research network. Main Outcome Measures: Women completed the FSDS-R, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and Menopausal Quality of Life Scale (MENQOL). Those who reported a change in the past month on the MENQOL sexual were categorized into a high sexual concerns group, while all others were categorized into a low sexual concerns group. Results: Women were an average of 54.6 years old (SD 3.1) and mostly Caucasian (77.4%), college educated (60.2%), married/living as married (64.5%), and postmenopausal (79.6%). The FSDS-R item number 1 "Distressed about sex life" was: (i) highly correlated with FSDS-R total scores (r=0.90); (ii) moderately correlated with FSFI total scores (r=-0.38) and FSFI desire (r=-0.37) and satisfaction domains (r=-0.40); and (iii) showed one of the largest mean differences between high and low sexual concerns groups (P<0.001). Other FSDS-R items met one or two, but not all three of the prespecified criteria (i, ii, iii). Conclusions: A single FSDS-R item may be a useful screening tool to quickly identify midlife women with sexually related distress when it is not feasible to administer the entire scale, though further validation is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-13
Number of pages7
JournalSexual Medicine
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2015

Fingerprint

Menopause
Health
Quality of Life
Research
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Female Sexual Distress Scale Revised
  • Menopause
  • Quality of Life
  • Sexual Behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Dermatology
  • Urology

Cite this

Carpenter, J., Reed, S. D., Guthrie, K. A., Larson, J. C., Newton, K. M., Lau, R. J., ... Shifren, J. L. (2015). Using an FSDS-R Item to Screen for Sexually Related Distress: A MsFLASH Analysis. Sexual Medicine, 3(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sm2.53

Using an FSDS-R Item to Screen for Sexually Related Distress : A MsFLASH Analysis. / Carpenter, Janet; Reed, Susan D.; Guthrie, Katherine A.; Larson, Joseph C.; Newton, Katherine M.; Lau, R. Jane; Learman, Lee A.; Shifren, Jan L.

In: Sexual Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.03.2015, p. 7-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carpenter, J, Reed, SD, Guthrie, KA, Larson, JC, Newton, KM, Lau, RJ, Learman, LA & Shifren, JL 2015, 'Using an FSDS-R Item to Screen for Sexually Related Distress: A MsFLASH Analysis', Sexual Medicine, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 7-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/sm2.53
Carpenter, Janet ; Reed, Susan D. ; Guthrie, Katherine A. ; Larson, Joseph C. ; Newton, Katherine M. ; Lau, R. Jane ; Learman, Lee A. ; Shifren, Jan L. / Using an FSDS-R Item to Screen for Sexually Related Distress : A MsFLASH Analysis. In: Sexual Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 7-13.
@article{812578ca0cbb4c1baeb1c145bb17c68d,
title = "Using an FSDS-R Item to Screen for Sexually Related Distress: A MsFLASH Analysis",
abstract = "Introduction: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) was created and validated to assess distress associated with impaired sexual function, but it is lengthy for use in clinical practice and research when assessing sexual function is not a primary objective. Aim: The study aims to evaluate whether a single item from the FSDS-R could be identified to use to screen midlife women for bothersome diminution in sexual function based on three criteria: (i) highly correlated with total scores; (ii) correlated with commonly assessed domains of female sexual functioning; and (iii) able to differentiate between women reporting high and low sexual concerns during the prior month. Methods: Data from 93 midlife women were collected by the Menopause Strategies Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health (MsFLASH) research network. Main Outcome Measures: Women completed the FSDS-R, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and Menopausal Quality of Life Scale (MENQOL). Those who reported a change in the past month on the MENQOL sexual were categorized into a high sexual concerns group, while all others were categorized into a low sexual concerns group. Results: Women were an average of 54.6 years old (SD 3.1) and mostly Caucasian (77.4{\%}), college educated (60.2{\%}), married/living as married (64.5{\%}), and postmenopausal (79.6{\%}). The FSDS-R item number 1 {"}Distressed about sex life{"} was: (i) highly correlated with FSDS-R total scores (r=0.90); (ii) moderately correlated with FSFI total scores (r=-0.38) and FSFI desire (r=-0.37) and satisfaction domains (r=-0.40); and (iii) showed one of the largest mean differences between high and low sexual concerns groups (P<0.001). Other FSDS-R items met one or two, but not all three of the prespecified criteria (i, ii, iii). Conclusions: A single FSDS-R item may be a useful screening tool to quickly identify midlife women with sexually related distress when it is not feasible to administer the entire scale, though further validation is warranted.",
keywords = "Adult, Female, Female Sexual Distress Scale Revised, Menopause, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior",
author = "Janet Carpenter and Reed, {Susan D.} and Guthrie, {Katherine A.} and Larson, {Joseph C.} and Newton, {Katherine M.} and Lau, {R. Jane} and Learman, {Lee A.} and Shifren, {Jan L.}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/sm2.53",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "7--13",
journal = "Sexual Medicine",
issn = "2050-1161",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using an FSDS-R Item to Screen for Sexually Related Distress

T2 - A MsFLASH Analysis

AU - Carpenter, Janet

AU - Reed, Susan D.

AU - Guthrie, Katherine A.

AU - Larson, Joseph C.

AU - Newton, Katherine M.

AU - Lau, R. Jane

AU - Learman, Lee A.

AU - Shifren, Jan L.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Introduction: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) was created and validated to assess distress associated with impaired sexual function, but it is lengthy for use in clinical practice and research when assessing sexual function is not a primary objective. Aim: The study aims to evaluate whether a single item from the FSDS-R could be identified to use to screen midlife women for bothersome diminution in sexual function based on three criteria: (i) highly correlated with total scores; (ii) correlated with commonly assessed domains of female sexual functioning; and (iii) able to differentiate between women reporting high and low sexual concerns during the prior month. Methods: Data from 93 midlife women were collected by the Menopause Strategies Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health (MsFLASH) research network. Main Outcome Measures: Women completed the FSDS-R, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and Menopausal Quality of Life Scale (MENQOL). Those who reported a change in the past month on the MENQOL sexual were categorized into a high sexual concerns group, while all others were categorized into a low sexual concerns group. Results: Women were an average of 54.6 years old (SD 3.1) and mostly Caucasian (77.4%), college educated (60.2%), married/living as married (64.5%), and postmenopausal (79.6%). The FSDS-R item number 1 "Distressed about sex life" was: (i) highly correlated with FSDS-R total scores (r=0.90); (ii) moderately correlated with FSFI total scores (r=-0.38) and FSFI desire (r=-0.37) and satisfaction domains (r=-0.40); and (iii) showed one of the largest mean differences between high and low sexual concerns groups (P<0.001). Other FSDS-R items met one or two, but not all three of the prespecified criteria (i, ii, iii). Conclusions: A single FSDS-R item may be a useful screening tool to quickly identify midlife women with sexually related distress when it is not feasible to administer the entire scale, though further validation is warranted.

AB - Introduction: The Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised (FSDS-R) was created and validated to assess distress associated with impaired sexual function, but it is lengthy for use in clinical practice and research when assessing sexual function is not a primary objective. Aim: The study aims to evaluate whether a single item from the FSDS-R could be identified to use to screen midlife women for bothersome diminution in sexual function based on three criteria: (i) highly correlated with total scores; (ii) correlated with commonly assessed domains of female sexual functioning; and (iii) able to differentiate between women reporting high and low sexual concerns during the prior month. Methods: Data from 93 midlife women were collected by the Menopause Strategies Finding Lasting Answers to Symptoms and Health (MsFLASH) research network. Main Outcome Measures: Women completed the FSDS-R, Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), and Menopausal Quality of Life Scale (MENQOL). Those who reported a change in the past month on the MENQOL sexual were categorized into a high sexual concerns group, while all others were categorized into a low sexual concerns group. Results: Women were an average of 54.6 years old (SD 3.1) and mostly Caucasian (77.4%), college educated (60.2%), married/living as married (64.5%), and postmenopausal (79.6%). The FSDS-R item number 1 "Distressed about sex life" was: (i) highly correlated with FSDS-R total scores (r=0.90); (ii) moderately correlated with FSFI total scores (r=-0.38) and FSFI desire (r=-0.37) and satisfaction domains (r=-0.40); and (iii) showed one of the largest mean differences between high and low sexual concerns groups (P<0.001). Other FSDS-R items met one or two, but not all three of the prespecified criteria (i, ii, iii). Conclusions: A single FSDS-R item may be a useful screening tool to quickly identify midlife women with sexually related distress when it is not feasible to administer the entire scale, though further validation is warranted.

KW - Adult

KW - Female

KW - Female Sexual Distress Scale Revised

KW - Menopause

KW - Quality of Life

KW - Sexual Behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979831183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84979831183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sm2.53

DO - 10.1002/sm2.53

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84979831183

VL - 3

SP - 7

EP - 13

JO - Sexual Medicine

JF - Sexual Medicine

SN - 2050-1161

IS - 1

ER -