Using simulation to assess the influence of race and insurer on shared decision making in periviable counseling

Brownsne Tucker Edmonds, Fatima McKenzie, William F. Fadel, Marianne Matthias, Michelle P. Salyers, Amber E. Barnato, Richard Frankel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Sociodemographic differences have been observed in the treatment of extremely premature (periviable) neonates, but the source of this variation is not well understood. We assessed the feasibility of using simulation to test the effect of maternal race and insurance status on shared decision making (SDM) in periviable counseling. Methods: Weconducted a 2 × 2 factorial simulation experiment in which obstetricians and neonatologists counseled 2 consecutive standardized patients diagnosed with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks, counterbalancing race (black/white) and insurance status using random permutation.We assessed verisimilitude of the simulation in semistructured debriefing interviews. Wecoded physician communication related to resuscitation, mode of delivery, and steroid decisions using a 9-point SDM coding framework and then compared communication scores by standardized patient race and insurer using analysis of variance. Results: Sixteen obstetricians and 15 neonatologists participated; 71% were women, 84% were married, and 75% were parents; 91% of the physicians rated the simulation as highly realistic. Overall, SDMscores were relatively high,with means ranging from 6.4 to 7.9 (of 9). There was a statistically significant interaction between race and insurer for SDM related to steroid use and mode of delivery (P G 0.01 and P = 0.01, respectively). Between-group comparison revealed nonsignificant differences (P = G0.10) between the SDM scores for privately insured black patients versus privately insured white patients, Medicaid-insured white patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients, and privately insured black patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients. Conclusions: This study confirms that simulation is a feasible method for studying sociodemographic effects on periviable counseling. Shared decision making may occur differentially based on patients' sociodemographic characteristics and deserves further study.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)353-359
Number of pages7
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Volume9
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 20 2014

Fingerprint

Insurance Carriers
Counseling
counseling
Decision Making
Decision making
decision making
simulation
Steroids
Insurance
Simulation
Medicaid
insurance
physician
Resuscitation
Insurance Coverage
Factorial Experiment
Random Permutation
communication
Communication
Analysis of variance

Keywords

  • Doctor-patient communication
  • Health disparities
  • Periviability
  • Shared decision making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Epidemiology
  • Education
  • Modeling and Simulation

Cite this

Using simulation to assess the influence of race and insurer on shared decision making in periviable counseling. / Tucker Edmonds, Brownsne; McKenzie, Fatima; Fadel, William F.; Matthias, Marianne; Salyers, Michelle P.; Barnato, Amber E.; Frankel, Richard.

In: Simulation in Healthcare, Vol. 9, No. 6, 20.12.2014, p. 353-359.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ba3cc7e2cda414aa95f3421cbc5476b,
title = "Using simulation to assess the influence of race and insurer on shared decision making in periviable counseling",
abstract = "Introduction: Sociodemographic differences have been observed in the treatment of extremely premature (periviable) neonates, but the source of this variation is not well understood. We assessed the feasibility of using simulation to test the effect of maternal race and insurance status on shared decision making (SDM) in periviable counseling. Methods: Weconducted a 2 × 2 factorial simulation experiment in which obstetricians and neonatologists counseled 2 consecutive standardized patients diagnosed with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks, counterbalancing race (black/white) and insurance status using random permutation.We assessed verisimilitude of the simulation in semistructured debriefing interviews. Wecoded physician communication related to resuscitation, mode of delivery, and steroid decisions using a 9-point SDM coding framework and then compared communication scores by standardized patient race and insurer using analysis of variance. Results: Sixteen obstetricians and 15 neonatologists participated; 71{\%} were women, 84{\%} were married, and 75{\%} were parents; 91{\%} of the physicians rated the simulation as highly realistic. Overall, SDMscores were relatively high,with means ranging from 6.4 to 7.9 (of 9). There was a statistically significant interaction between race and insurer for SDM related to steroid use and mode of delivery (P G 0.01 and P = 0.01, respectively). Between-group comparison revealed nonsignificant differences (P = G0.10) between the SDM scores for privately insured black patients versus privately insured white patients, Medicaid-insured white patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients, and privately insured black patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients. Conclusions: This study confirms that simulation is a feasible method for studying sociodemographic effects on periviable counseling. Shared decision making may occur differentially based on patients' sociodemographic characteristics and deserves further study.",
keywords = "Doctor-patient communication, Health disparities, Periviability, Shared decision making",
author = "{Tucker Edmonds}, Brownsne and Fatima McKenzie and Fadel, {William F.} and Marianne Matthias and Salyers, {Michelle P.} and Barnato, {Amber E.} and Richard Frankel",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1097/SIH.0000000000000049",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "353--359",
journal = "Simulation in Healthcare",
issn = "1559-2332",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using simulation to assess the influence of race and insurer on shared decision making in periviable counseling

AU - Tucker Edmonds, Brownsne

AU - McKenzie, Fatima

AU - Fadel, William F.

AU - Matthias, Marianne

AU - Salyers, Michelle P.

AU - Barnato, Amber E.

AU - Frankel, Richard

PY - 2014/12/20

Y1 - 2014/12/20

N2 - Introduction: Sociodemographic differences have been observed in the treatment of extremely premature (periviable) neonates, but the source of this variation is not well understood. We assessed the feasibility of using simulation to test the effect of maternal race and insurance status on shared decision making (SDM) in periviable counseling. Methods: Weconducted a 2 × 2 factorial simulation experiment in which obstetricians and neonatologists counseled 2 consecutive standardized patients diagnosed with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks, counterbalancing race (black/white) and insurance status using random permutation.We assessed verisimilitude of the simulation in semistructured debriefing interviews. Wecoded physician communication related to resuscitation, mode of delivery, and steroid decisions using a 9-point SDM coding framework and then compared communication scores by standardized patient race and insurer using analysis of variance. Results: Sixteen obstetricians and 15 neonatologists participated; 71% were women, 84% were married, and 75% were parents; 91% of the physicians rated the simulation as highly realistic. Overall, SDMscores were relatively high,with means ranging from 6.4 to 7.9 (of 9). There was a statistically significant interaction between race and insurer for SDM related to steroid use and mode of delivery (P G 0.01 and P = 0.01, respectively). Between-group comparison revealed nonsignificant differences (P = G0.10) between the SDM scores for privately insured black patients versus privately insured white patients, Medicaid-insured white patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients, and privately insured black patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients. Conclusions: This study confirms that simulation is a feasible method for studying sociodemographic effects on periviable counseling. Shared decision making may occur differentially based on patients' sociodemographic characteristics and deserves further study.

AB - Introduction: Sociodemographic differences have been observed in the treatment of extremely premature (periviable) neonates, but the source of this variation is not well understood. We assessed the feasibility of using simulation to test the effect of maternal race and insurance status on shared decision making (SDM) in periviable counseling. Methods: Weconducted a 2 × 2 factorial simulation experiment in which obstetricians and neonatologists counseled 2 consecutive standardized patients diagnosed with ruptured membranes at 23 weeks, counterbalancing race (black/white) and insurance status using random permutation.We assessed verisimilitude of the simulation in semistructured debriefing interviews. Wecoded physician communication related to resuscitation, mode of delivery, and steroid decisions using a 9-point SDM coding framework and then compared communication scores by standardized patient race and insurer using analysis of variance. Results: Sixteen obstetricians and 15 neonatologists participated; 71% were women, 84% were married, and 75% were parents; 91% of the physicians rated the simulation as highly realistic. Overall, SDMscores were relatively high,with means ranging from 6.4 to 7.9 (of 9). There was a statistically significant interaction between race and insurer for SDM related to steroid use and mode of delivery (P G 0.01 and P = 0.01, respectively). Between-group comparison revealed nonsignificant differences (P = G0.10) between the SDM scores for privately insured black patients versus privately insured white patients, Medicaid-insured white patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients, and privately insured black patients versus Medicaid-insured black patients. Conclusions: This study confirms that simulation is a feasible method for studying sociodemographic effects on periviable counseling. Shared decision making may occur differentially based on patients' sociodemographic characteristics and deserves further study.

KW - Doctor-patient communication

KW - Health disparities

KW - Periviability

KW - Shared decision making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919496728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84919496728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000049

DO - 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000049

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 353

EP - 359

JO - Simulation in Healthcare

JF - Simulation in Healthcare

SN - 1559-2332

IS - 6

ER -