Utilizing an integrated infrastructure for outcomes research: A systematic review

Brian Dixon, Elizabeth C. Whipple, John M. Lajiness, Michael Murray

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To explore the ability of an integrated health information infrastructure to support outcomes research. Methods: A systematic review of articles published from 1983 to 2012 by Regenstrief Institute investigators using data from an integrated electronic health record infrastructure involving multiple provider organisations was performed. Articles were independently assessed and classified by study design, disease and other metadata including bibliometrics. Results: A total of 190 articles were identified. Diseases included cognitive, (16) cardiovascular, (16) infectious, (15) chronic illness (14) and cancer (12). Publications grew steadily (26 in the first decade vs. 100 in the last) as did the number of investigators (from 15 in 1983 to 62 in 2012). The proportion of articles involving non-Regenstrief authors also expanded from 54% in the first decade to 72% in the last decade. During this period, the infrastructure grew from a single health system into a health information exchange network covering more than 6 million patients. Analysis of journal and article metrics reveals high impact for clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research studies that utilised data available in the integrated infrastructure. Discussion: Integrated information infrastructures support growth in high quality observational studies and diverse collaboration consistent with the goals for the learning health system. More recent publications demonstrate growing external collaborations facilitated by greater access to the infrastructure and improved opportunities to study broader disease and health outcomes. Conclusions: Integrated information infrastructures can stimulate learning from electronic data captured during routine clinical care but require time and collaboration to reach full potential.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)7-32
Number of pages26
JournalHealth Information and Libraries Journal
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
infrastructure
Health
Comparative Effectiveness Research
Research Personnel
Learning
Bibliometrics
Aptitude
Information Services
health information
Disease
health
Electronic Health Records
Observational Studies
Publications
electronics
Chronic Disease
Clinical Trials
Organizations
information exchange

Keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Comparative study
  • Effectiveness
  • Informatics
  • Information systems
  • Medical
  • Research networks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Utilizing an integrated infrastructure for outcomes research : A systematic review. / Dixon, Brian; Whipple, Elizabeth C.; Lajiness, John M.; Murray, Michael.

In: Health Information and Libraries Journal, Vol. 33, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 7-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{95eb22564d394bc58a2d45cd5ef53fe9,
title = "Utilizing an integrated infrastructure for outcomes research: A systematic review",
abstract = "Objective: To explore the ability of an integrated health information infrastructure to support outcomes research. Methods: A systematic review of articles published from 1983 to 2012 by Regenstrief Institute investigators using data from an integrated electronic health record infrastructure involving multiple provider organisations was performed. Articles were independently assessed and classified by study design, disease and other metadata including bibliometrics. Results: A total of 190 articles were identified. Diseases included cognitive, (16) cardiovascular, (16) infectious, (15) chronic illness (14) and cancer (12). Publications grew steadily (26 in the first decade vs. 100 in the last) as did the number of investigators (from 15 in 1983 to 62 in 2012). The proportion of articles involving non-Regenstrief authors also expanded from 54{\%} in the first decade to 72{\%} in the last decade. During this period, the infrastructure grew from a single health system into a health information exchange network covering more than 6 million patients. Analysis of journal and article metrics reveals high impact for clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research studies that utilised data available in the integrated infrastructure. Discussion: Integrated information infrastructures support growth in high quality observational studies and diverse collaboration consistent with the goals for the learning health system. More recent publications demonstrate growing external collaborations facilitated by greater access to the infrastructure and improved opportunities to study broader disease and health outcomes. Conclusions: Integrated information infrastructures can stimulate learning from electronic data captured during routine clinical care but require time and collaboration to reach full potential.",
keywords = "Bibliometrics, Comparative study, Effectiveness, Informatics, Information systems, Medical, Research networks",
author = "Brian Dixon and Whipple, {Elizabeth C.} and Lajiness, {John M.} and Michael Murray",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/hir.12127",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "7--32",
journal = "Health Information and Libraries Journal",
issn = "1471-1834",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Utilizing an integrated infrastructure for outcomes research

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Dixon, Brian

AU - Whipple, Elizabeth C.

AU - Lajiness, John M.

AU - Murray, Michael

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Objective: To explore the ability of an integrated health information infrastructure to support outcomes research. Methods: A systematic review of articles published from 1983 to 2012 by Regenstrief Institute investigators using data from an integrated electronic health record infrastructure involving multiple provider organisations was performed. Articles were independently assessed and classified by study design, disease and other metadata including bibliometrics. Results: A total of 190 articles were identified. Diseases included cognitive, (16) cardiovascular, (16) infectious, (15) chronic illness (14) and cancer (12). Publications grew steadily (26 in the first decade vs. 100 in the last) as did the number of investigators (from 15 in 1983 to 62 in 2012). The proportion of articles involving non-Regenstrief authors also expanded from 54% in the first decade to 72% in the last decade. During this period, the infrastructure grew from a single health system into a health information exchange network covering more than 6 million patients. Analysis of journal and article metrics reveals high impact for clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research studies that utilised data available in the integrated infrastructure. Discussion: Integrated information infrastructures support growth in high quality observational studies and diverse collaboration consistent with the goals for the learning health system. More recent publications demonstrate growing external collaborations facilitated by greater access to the infrastructure and improved opportunities to study broader disease and health outcomes. Conclusions: Integrated information infrastructures can stimulate learning from electronic data captured during routine clinical care but require time and collaboration to reach full potential.

AB - Objective: To explore the ability of an integrated health information infrastructure to support outcomes research. Methods: A systematic review of articles published from 1983 to 2012 by Regenstrief Institute investigators using data from an integrated electronic health record infrastructure involving multiple provider organisations was performed. Articles were independently assessed and classified by study design, disease and other metadata including bibliometrics. Results: A total of 190 articles were identified. Diseases included cognitive, (16) cardiovascular, (16) infectious, (15) chronic illness (14) and cancer (12). Publications grew steadily (26 in the first decade vs. 100 in the last) as did the number of investigators (from 15 in 1983 to 62 in 2012). The proportion of articles involving non-Regenstrief authors also expanded from 54% in the first decade to 72% in the last decade. During this period, the infrastructure grew from a single health system into a health information exchange network covering more than 6 million patients. Analysis of journal and article metrics reveals high impact for clinical trials and comparative effectiveness research studies that utilised data available in the integrated infrastructure. Discussion: Integrated information infrastructures support growth in high quality observational studies and diverse collaboration consistent with the goals for the learning health system. More recent publications demonstrate growing external collaborations facilitated by greater access to the infrastructure and improved opportunities to study broader disease and health outcomes. Conclusions: Integrated information infrastructures can stimulate learning from electronic data captured during routine clinical care but require time and collaboration to reach full potential.

KW - Bibliometrics

KW - Comparative study

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Informatics

KW - Information systems

KW - Medical

KW - Research networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961257725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961257725&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/hir.12127

DO - 10.1111/hir.12127

M3 - Article

C2 - 26639793

AN - SCOPUS:84961257725

VL - 33

SP - 7

EP - 32

JO - Health Information and Libraries Journal

JF - Health Information and Libraries Journal

SN - 1471-1834

IS - 1

ER -