Validation analysis of informant's ratings of cognitive function in African Americans and Nigerians

Jianzhao Shen, Sujuan Gao, Frederick Unverzagt, Adesola Ogunniyi, Olusegun Baiyewu, Oye Gureje, Hugh Hendrie, Kathleen Hall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine informant validity using the Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D') both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures and to explore the effects of informants and study participants' characteristics on the validity of informants' reports. Methods: Elderly African Americans age 65 years and older residing in Indianapolis, USA and elderly Yoruba Nigerians age 65 years and older residing in Ibadan, Nigeria were assessed on cognitive functioning using the CSI 'D' at baseline (1992-1993) and five-year follow-up (1997-1998). At baseline, the informant validity in both samples was evaluated against participants' cognitive tests using Pearson correlation and regular regression models. At follow-up, informants ratings on cognitive decline were assessed against participants' cognitive decline scores from baseline to follow-up using biserial correlation and logistic regressions. Results: At baseline, informants' reports on cognitive fun ctioning significantly correlated with cognitive scores in both samples (Indianapolis:r = -0.43, p < 0.001; Ibadan:r = -0.47, p < 0.001). The participant-informant relationships significantly affected the informants' reports in the two samples with different patterns (p = 0.005 for Indianapolis and p < 0.001 for Ibadan) at a given level of cognitive functioning. African Americans spouses reported more cognitive problems, while siblings reported more problems for the Yoruba Nigerians. At follow-up, informants' ratings on cognitive decline significantly correlated with the cognitive decline scores (Indianapolis r=0.38, p < 0.001; Ibadan r=0.32, p < 0.001). The characteristics of study participants and informants had little impact on the informants' ratings on cognitive decline. Conclusions: Informant reports are valid in assessing the cognitive functioning of study participants both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures, languages and environments.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)618-625
Number of pages8
JournalInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Volume21
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006

Fingerprint

African Americans
Cognition
Dementia
Interviews
Nigeria
Spouses
Siblings
Language
Logistic Models
Cognitive Dysfunction

Keywords

  • Cognitive function
  • Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D')
  • Cross-cultural studies
  • Dementia
  • Informant's reports
  • Validity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Validation analysis of informant's ratings of cognitive function in African Americans and Nigerians. / Shen, Jianzhao; Gao, Sujuan; Unverzagt, Frederick; Ogunniyi, Adesola; Baiyewu, Olusegun; Gureje, Oye; Hendrie, Hugh; Hall, Kathleen.

In: International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 21, No. 7, 07.2006, p. 618-625.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{83ff1e3690ea44bf92c3dab4b6ef3eaf,
title = "Validation analysis of informant's ratings of cognitive function in African Americans and Nigerians",
abstract = "Objectives: To examine informant validity using the Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D') both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures and to explore the effects of informants and study participants' characteristics on the validity of informants' reports. Methods: Elderly African Americans age 65 years and older residing in Indianapolis, USA and elderly Yoruba Nigerians age 65 years and older residing in Ibadan, Nigeria were assessed on cognitive functioning using the CSI 'D' at baseline (1992-1993) and five-year follow-up (1997-1998). At baseline, the informant validity in both samples was evaluated against participants' cognitive tests using Pearson correlation and regular regression models. At follow-up, informants ratings on cognitive decline were assessed against participants' cognitive decline scores from baseline to follow-up using biserial correlation and logistic regressions. Results: At baseline, informants' reports on cognitive fun ctioning significantly correlated with cognitive scores in both samples (Indianapolis:r = -0.43, p < 0.001; Ibadan:r = -0.47, p < 0.001). The participant-informant relationships significantly affected the informants' reports in the two samples with different patterns (p = 0.005 for Indianapolis and p < 0.001 for Ibadan) at a given level of cognitive functioning. African Americans spouses reported more cognitive problems, while siblings reported more problems for the Yoruba Nigerians. At follow-up, informants' ratings on cognitive decline significantly correlated with the cognitive decline scores (Indianapolis r=0.38, p < 0.001; Ibadan r=0.32, p < 0.001). The characteristics of study participants and informants had little impact on the informants' ratings on cognitive decline. Conclusions: Informant reports are valid in assessing the cognitive functioning of study participants both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures, languages and environments.",
keywords = "Cognitive function, Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D'), Cross-cultural studies, Dementia, Informant's reports, Validity",
author = "Jianzhao Shen and Sujuan Gao and Frederick Unverzagt and Adesola Ogunniyi and Olusegun Baiyewu and Oye Gureje and Hugh Hendrie and Kathleen Hall",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/gps.1536",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "618--625",
journal = "International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry",
issn = "0885-6230",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation analysis of informant's ratings of cognitive function in African Americans and Nigerians

AU - Shen, Jianzhao

AU - Gao, Sujuan

AU - Unverzagt, Frederick

AU - Ogunniyi, Adesola

AU - Baiyewu, Olusegun

AU - Gureje, Oye

AU - Hendrie, Hugh

AU - Hall, Kathleen

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Objectives: To examine informant validity using the Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D') both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures and to explore the effects of informants and study participants' characteristics on the validity of informants' reports. Methods: Elderly African Americans age 65 years and older residing in Indianapolis, USA and elderly Yoruba Nigerians age 65 years and older residing in Ibadan, Nigeria were assessed on cognitive functioning using the CSI 'D' at baseline (1992-1993) and five-year follow-up (1997-1998). At baseline, the informant validity in both samples was evaluated against participants' cognitive tests using Pearson correlation and regular regression models. At follow-up, informants ratings on cognitive decline were assessed against participants' cognitive decline scores from baseline to follow-up using biserial correlation and logistic regressions. Results: At baseline, informants' reports on cognitive fun ctioning significantly correlated with cognitive scores in both samples (Indianapolis:r = -0.43, p < 0.001; Ibadan:r = -0.47, p < 0.001). The participant-informant relationships significantly affected the informants' reports in the two samples with different patterns (p = 0.005 for Indianapolis and p < 0.001 for Ibadan) at a given level of cognitive functioning. African Americans spouses reported more cognitive problems, while siblings reported more problems for the Yoruba Nigerians. At follow-up, informants' ratings on cognitive decline significantly correlated with the cognitive decline scores (Indianapolis r=0.38, p < 0.001; Ibadan r=0.32, p < 0.001). The characteristics of study participants and informants had little impact on the informants' ratings on cognitive decline. Conclusions: Informant reports are valid in assessing the cognitive functioning of study participants both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures, languages and environments.

AB - Objectives: To examine informant validity using the Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D') both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures and to explore the effects of informants and study participants' characteristics on the validity of informants' reports. Methods: Elderly African Americans age 65 years and older residing in Indianapolis, USA and elderly Yoruba Nigerians age 65 years and older residing in Ibadan, Nigeria were assessed on cognitive functioning using the CSI 'D' at baseline (1992-1993) and five-year follow-up (1997-1998). At baseline, the informant validity in both samples was evaluated against participants' cognitive tests using Pearson correlation and regular regression models. At follow-up, informants ratings on cognitive decline were assessed against participants' cognitive decline scores from baseline to follow-up using biserial correlation and logistic regressions. Results: At baseline, informants' reports on cognitive fun ctioning significantly correlated with cognitive scores in both samples (Indianapolis:r = -0.43, p < 0.001; Ibadan:r = -0.47, p < 0.001). The participant-informant relationships significantly affected the informants' reports in the two samples with different patterns (p = 0.005 for Indianapolis and p < 0.001 for Ibadan) at a given level of cognitive functioning. African Americans spouses reported more cognitive problems, while siblings reported more problems for the Yoruba Nigerians. At follow-up, informants' ratings on cognitive decline significantly correlated with the cognitive decline scores (Indianapolis r=0.38, p < 0.001; Ibadan r=0.32, p < 0.001). The characteristics of study participants and informants had little impact on the informants' ratings on cognitive decline. Conclusions: Informant reports are valid in assessing the cognitive functioning of study participants both cross-sectionally and longitudinally in two very different cultures, languages and environments.

KW - Cognitive function

KW - Community Screening Interview for Dementia (CSI 'D')

KW - Cross-cultural studies

KW - Dementia

KW - Informant's reports

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746457276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33746457276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/gps.1536

DO - 10.1002/gps.1536

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 618

EP - 625

JO - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

JF - International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

SN - 0885-6230

IS - 7

ER -