Validation of a simple approach to caries risk assessment

James D. Bader, Nancy A. Perrin, Gerardo Maupome, Brad Rindal, William A. Rush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the predictive validity of a simple subjective method promoted to dentists for assessing their patients' caries risk. Methods: Data from two large group practices that have used guideline-assisted caries risk assessment (CRA) for several years were analyzed retrospectively to determine the receipt of caries-related treatment following a CRA. Patient age and receipt of caries preventive treatment subsequent to the CRA were control variables in logistic regressions to determine the likelihood of caries-related treatment for low, moderate, and high risk groups. Results: Among 45,693 individuals in the two plans, those categorized as being at high caries risk were approximately four times as likely to receive any caries-related treatment as those categorized as being at low caries risk. Those categorized as at moderate risk were approximately twice as likely to receive any treatment. In addition, for those at elevated risk who required any treatment, the number of teeth requiring treatment was larger. Conclusion: The results of this study provide the first large-scale, generalizable evidence for the validity of dentists' subjective assessment of caries risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)76-81
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Public Health Dentistry
Volume65
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dentists
Therapeutics
Group Practice
Tooth
Logistic Models
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Caries risk assessment
  • Dental caries
  • Dental caries incidence
  • Dentist practice patterns

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Bader, J. D., Perrin, N. A., Maupome, G., Rindal, B., & Rush, W. A. (2005). Validation of a simple approach to caries risk assessment. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 65(2), 76-81.

Validation of a simple approach to caries risk assessment. / Bader, James D.; Perrin, Nancy A.; Maupome, Gerardo; Rindal, Brad; Rush, William A.

In: Journal of Public Health Dentistry, Vol. 65, No. 2, 03.2005, p. 76-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bader, JD, Perrin, NA, Maupome, G, Rindal, B & Rush, WA 2005, 'Validation of a simple approach to caries risk assessment', Journal of Public Health Dentistry, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 76-81.
Bader, James D. ; Perrin, Nancy A. ; Maupome, Gerardo ; Rindal, Brad ; Rush, William A. / Validation of a simple approach to caries risk assessment. In: Journal of Public Health Dentistry. 2005 ; Vol. 65, No. 2. pp. 76-81.
@article{2958c34369c4465d8a8cbcb6878ee44c,
title = "Validation of a simple approach to caries risk assessment",
abstract = "Objective: This study examined the predictive validity of a simple subjective method promoted to dentists for assessing their patients' caries risk. Methods: Data from two large group practices that have used guideline-assisted caries risk assessment (CRA) for several years were analyzed retrospectively to determine the receipt of caries-related treatment following a CRA. Patient age and receipt of caries preventive treatment subsequent to the CRA were control variables in logistic regressions to determine the likelihood of caries-related treatment for low, moderate, and high risk groups. Results: Among 45,693 individuals in the two plans, those categorized as being at high caries risk were approximately four times as likely to receive any caries-related treatment as those categorized as being at low caries risk. Those categorized as at moderate risk were approximately twice as likely to receive any treatment. In addition, for those at elevated risk who required any treatment, the number of teeth requiring treatment was larger. Conclusion: The results of this study provide the first large-scale, generalizable evidence for the validity of dentists' subjective assessment of caries risk.",
keywords = "Caries risk assessment, Dental caries, Dental caries incidence, Dentist practice patterns",
author = "Bader, {James D.} and Perrin, {Nancy A.} and Gerardo Maupome and Brad Rindal and Rush, {William A.}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "76--81",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Dentistry",
issn = "0022-4006",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of a simple approach to caries risk assessment

AU - Bader, James D.

AU - Perrin, Nancy A.

AU - Maupome, Gerardo

AU - Rindal, Brad

AU - Rush, William A.

PY - 2005/3

Y1 - 2005/3

N2 - Objective: This study examined the predictive validity of a simple subjective method promoted to dentists for assessing their patients' caries risk. Methods: Data from two large group practices that have used guideline-assisted caries risk assessment (CRA) for several years were analyzed retrospectively to determine the receipt of caries-related treatment following a CRA. Patient age and receipt of caries preventive treatment subsequent to the CRA were control variables in logistic regressions to determine the likelihood of caries-related treatment for low, moderate, and high risk groups. Results: Among 45,693 individuals in the two plans, those categorized as being at high caries risk were approximately four times as likely to receive any caries-related treatment as those categorized as being at low caries risk. Those categorized as at moderate risk were approximately twice as likely to receive any treatment. In addition, for those at elevated risk who required any treatment, the number of teeth requiring treatment was larger. Conclusion: The results of this study provide the first large-scale, generalizable evidence for the validity of dentists' subjective assessment of caries risk.

AB - Objective: This study examined the predictive validity of a simple subjective method promoted to dentists for assessing their patients' caries risk. Methods: Data from two large group practices that have used guideline-assisted caries risk assessment (CRA) for several years were analyzed retrospectively to determine the receipt of caries-related treatment following a CRA. Patient age and receipt of caries preventive treatment subsequent to the CRA were control variables in logistic regressions to determine the likelihood of caries-related treatment for low, moderate, and high risk groups. Results: Among 45,693 individuals in the two plans, those categorized as being at high caries risk were approximately four times as likely to receive any caries-related treatment as those categorized as being at low caries risk. Those categorized as at moderate risk were approximately twice as likely to receive any treatment. In addition, for those at elevated risk who required any treatment, the number of teeth requiring treatment was larger. Conclusion: The results of this study provide the first large-scale, generalizable evidence for the validity of dentists' subjective assessment of caries risk.

KW - Caries risk assessment

KW - Dental caries

KW - Dental caries incidence

KW - Dentist practice patterns

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17844401715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=17844401715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15929544

AN - SCOPUS:17844401715

VL - 65

SP - 76

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

JF - Journal of Public Health Dentistry

SN - 0022-4006

IS - 2

ER -