Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey

Alexia Torke, Patrick Monahan, Christopher Callahan, Paul Helft, Greg Sachs, Lucia D. Wocial, James E. Slaven, Kianna Montz, Lev Inger, Emily S. Burke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. Objectives The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. Methods After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. Results Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation −0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (−0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). Conclusion The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-108.e4
JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volume53
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Inpatients
Communication
Statistical Factor Analysis
Mental Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Reproducibility of Results
Length of Stay
Anxiety
Research Personnel
Health

Keywords

  • Communication
  • decision making
  • proxy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey. / Torke, Alexia; Monahan, Patrick; Callahan, Christopher; Helft, Paul; Sachs, Greg; Wocial, Lucia D.; Slaven, James E.; Montz, Kianna; Inger, Lev; Burke, Emily S.

In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Vol. 53, No. 1, 01.01.2017, p. 96-108.e4.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Torke, Alexia ; Monahan, Patrick ; Callahan, Christopher ; Helft, Paul ; Sachs, Greg ; Wocial, Lucia D. ; Slaven, James E. ; Montz, Kianna ; Inger, Lev ; Burke, Emily S. / Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey. In: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2017 ; Vol. 53, No. 1. pp. 96-108.e4.
@article{80f15dfcf74b458e99d64571c6e2bb8b,
title = "Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey",
abstract = "Context Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. Objectives The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. Methods After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. Results Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation −0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (−0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). Conclusion The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.",
keywords = "Communication, decision making, proxy",
author = "Alexia Torke and Patrick Monahan and Christopher Callahan and Paul Helft and Greg Sachs and Wocial, {Lucia D.} and Slaven, {James E.} and Kianna Montz and Lev Inger and Burke, {Emily S.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.010",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "96--108.e4",
journal = "Journal of Pain and Symptom Management",
issn = "0885-3924",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Validation of the Family Inpatient Communication Survey

AU - Torke, Alexia

AU - Monahan, Patrick

AU - Callahan, Christopher

AU - Helft, Paul

AU - Sachs, Greg

AU - Wocial, Lucia D.

AU - Slaven, James E.

AU - Montz, Kianna

AU - Inger, Lev

AU - Burke, Emily S.

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Context Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. Objectives The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. Methods After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. Results Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation −0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (−0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). Conclusion The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.

AB - Context Although many family members who make surrogate decisions report problems with communication, there is no validated instrument to accurately measure surrogate/clinician communication for older adults in the acute hospital setting. Objectives The objective of this study was to validate a survey of surrogate-rated communication quality in the hospital that would be useful to clinicians, researchers, and health systems. Methods After expert review and cognitive interviewing (n = 10 surrogates), we enrolled 350 surrogates (250 development sample and 100 validation sample) of hospitalized adults aged 65 years and older from three hospitals in one metropolitan area. The communication survey and a measure of decision quality were administered within hospital days 3 and 10. Mental health and satisfaction measures were administered six to eight weeks later. Results Factor analysis showed support for both one-factor (Total Communication) and two-factor models (Information and Emotional Support). Item reduction led to a final 30-item scale. For the validation sample, internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.96 (total), 0.94 (Information), and 0.90 (Emotional Support). Confirmatory factor analysis fit statistics were adequate (one-factor model, comparative fit index = 0.981, root mean square error of approximation = 0.62, weighted root mean square residual = 1.011; two-factor model comparative fit index = 0.984, root mean square error of approximation = 0.055, weighted root mean square residual = 0.930). Total score and subscales showed significant associations with the Decision Conflict Scale (Pearson correlation −0.43, P < 0.001 for total score). Emotional Support was associated with improved mental health outcomes at six to eight weeks, such as anxiety (−0.19 P < 0.001), and Information was associated with satisfaction with the hospital stay (0.49, P < 0.001). Conclusion The survey shows high reliability and validity in measuring communication experiences for hospital surrogates. The scale has promise for measurement of communication quality and is predictive of important outcomes, such as surrogate satisfaction and well-being.

KW - Communication

KW - decision making

KW - proxy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006747559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006747559&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 27720790

AN - SCOPUS:85006747559

VL - 53

SP - 96-108.e4

JO - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

JF - Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

SN - 0885-3924

IS - 1

ER -