Validity of the bulk-staining technique to separate artifactual from in vivo bone microdamage

D. B. Burr, T. Stafford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

238 Scopus citations

Abstract

Frost's bulk-staining technique clearly separates artifactual cracking in bone from that caused by mechanical loading in vivo. One-centimeter sections of human rib were either bulk stained before preparation of a thin section (experimental) or stained after grinding to a thickness of 150 μm (control). Microdamage produced before preparation can be separated from that caused by the preparation itself. Moreover, the technique does not cause additional artifactual cracking through dehydration. This technique provides a valid way to test hypotheses about the role that microdamage creation or its repair plays in skeletal pathology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-308
Number of pages4
JournalClinical orthopaedics and related research
Issue number260
DOIs
StatePublished - 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Validity of the bulk-staining technique to separate artifactual from in vivo bone microdamage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this