Values, quality, and evaluation in ethics consultation

Lucia D. Wocial, Elizabeth Molnar, Mary Ott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities has recommended regular evaluation of the quality of health care ethics consultation. This article discusses the impact of ethics consultation on clinicians' perceptions of a patient's plan of care and on the personal values of clinicians who participated in an ethics consultation. Methods: Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, select data points were abstracted from case file report forms for ethics consultations over a 12-month period. Clinicians involved in the care of a patient who was the focus of an ethics consultation were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. Clinicians who initiated an ethics consultation, were interviewed during the course of an ethics consultation, or were present at a patient care conference attended by an ethics consultant were invited to participate. A purposive sampling approach was used to invite clinicians to participate in an in-person interview. Results: The survey response rate was 44.4% (123 respondents from 277 invited). More than 60% of participants felt the consultation helped clarify the values of the patient and/or patient's family and helped them clarify their own values. Only 32% of participants indicated the patient's plan of care changed as a result of the ethics consultation, yet 75% indicated their confidence in the plan of care increased as a result of the ethics consultation. Preliminary findings from the qualitative interviews support the overall positive assessments reported by survey respondents. Conclusions: Ethics consultation can help clinicians clarify their own values and helps them clarify the values of patients and patients' families. Ethics consultation offers meaningful support when clinicians face ethically challenging cases, provides an opportunity to address moral distress, and is viewed favorably by those who experience the resource.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-8
Number of pages8
JournalAJOB Empirical Bioethics
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 9 2016

Fingerprint

Ethics Consultation
moral philosophy
evaluation
Values
Patient Care
Bioethics
Evaluation
Interviews
Ethicists
Quality of Health Care
Research Ethics Committees
Clinicians
bioethics
online survey
qualitative interview
patient care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Values, quality, and evaluation in ethics consultation. / Wocial, Lucia D.; Molnar, Elizabeth; Ott, Mary.

In: AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 09.01.2016, p. 1-8.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wocial, Lucia D. ; Molnar, Elizabeth ; Ott, Mary. / Values, quality, and evaluation in ethics consultation. In: AJOB Empirical Bioethics. 2016 ; pp. 1-8.
@article{d48d68c43c4c4922af273d8ea561a116,
title = "Values, quality, and evaluation in ethics consultation",
abstract = "Background: The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities has recommended regular evaluation of the quality of health care ethics consultation. This article discusses the impact of ethics consultation on clinicians' perceptions of a patient's plan of care and on the personal values of clinicians who participated in an ethics consultation. Methods: Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, select data points were abstracted from case file report forms for ethics consultations over a 12-month period. Clinicians involved in the care of a patient who was the focus of an ethics consultation were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. Clinicians who initiated an ethics consultation, were interviewed during the course of an ethics consultation, or were present at a patient care conference attended by an ethics consultant were invited to participate. A purposive sampling approach was used to invite clinicians to participate in an in-person interview. Results: The survey response rate was 44.4{\%} (123 respondents from 277 invited). More than 60{\%} of participants felt the consultation helped clarify the values of the patient and/or patient's family and helped them clarify their own values. Only 32{\%} of participants indicated the patient's plan of care changed as a result of the ethics consultation, yet 75{\%} indicated their confidence in the plan of care increased as a result of the ethics consultation. Preliminary findings from the qualitative interviews support the overall positive assessments reported by survey respondents. Conclusions: Ethics consultation can help clinicians clarify their own values and helps them clarify the values of patients and patients' families. Ethics consultation offers meaningful support when clinicians face ethically challenging cases, provides an opportunity to address moral distress, and is viewed favorably by those who experience the resource.",
author = "Wocial, {Lucia D.} and Elizabeth Molnar and Mary Ott",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1080/23294515.2015.1127295",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--8",
journal = "AJOB Empirical Bioethics",
issn = "2329-4515",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Values, quality, and evaluation in ethics consultation

AU - Wocial, Lucia D.

AU - Molnar, Elizabeth

AU - Ott, Mary

PY - 2016/1/9

Y1 - 2016/1/9

N2 - Background: The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities has recommended regular evaluation of the quality of health care ethics consultation. This article discusses the impact of ethics consultation on clinicians' perceptions of a patient's plan of care and on the personal values of clinicians who participated in an ethics consultation. Methods: Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, select data points were abstracted from case file report forms for ethics consultations over a 12-month period. Clinicians involved in the care of a patient who was the focus of an ethics consultation were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. Clinicians who initiated an ethics consultation, were interviewed during the course of an ethics consultation, or were present at a patient care conference attended by an ethics consultant were invited to participate. A purposive sampling approach was used to invite clinicians to participate in an in-person interview. Results: The survey response rate was 44.4% (123 respondents from 277 invited). More than 60% of participants felt the consultation helped clarify the values of the patient and/or patient's family and helped them clarify their own values. Only 32% of participants indicated the patient's plan of care changed as a result of the ethics consultation, yet 75% indicated their confidence in the plan of care increased as a result of the ethics consultation. Preliminary findings from the qualitative interviews support the overall positive assessments reported by survey respondents. Conclusions: Ethics consultation can help clinicians clarify their own values and helps them clarify the values of patients and patients' families. Ethics consultation offers meaningful support when clinicians face ethically challenging cases, provides an opportunity to address moral distress, and is viewed favorably by those who experience the resource.

AB - Background: The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities has recommended regular evaluation of the quality of health care ethics consultation. This article discusses the impact of ethics consultation on clinicians' perceptions of a patient's plan of care and on the personal values of clinicians who participated in an ethics consultation. Methods: Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, select data points were abstracted from case file report forms for ethics consultations over a 12-month period. Clinicians involved in the care of a patient who was the focus of an ethics consultation were invited to participate in an anonymous online survey. Clinicians who initiated an ethics consultation, were interviewed during the course of an ethics consultation, or were present at a patient care conference attended by an ethics consultant were invited to participate. A purposive sampling approach was used to invite clinicians to participate in an in-person interview. Results: The survey response rate was 44.4% (123 respondents from 277 invited). More than 60% of participants felt the consultation helped clarify the values of the patient and/or patient's family and helped them clarify their own values. Only 32% of participants indicated the patient's plan of care changed as a result of the ethics consultation, yet 75% indicated their confidence in the plan of care increased as a result of the ethics consultation. Preliminary findings from the qualitative interviews support the overall positive assessments reported by survey respondents. Conclusions: Ethics consultation can help clinicians clarify their own values and helps them clarify the values of patients and patients' families. Ethics consultation offers meaningful support when clinicians face ethically challenging cases, provides an opportunity to address moral distress, and is viewed favorably by those who experience the resource.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954285141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954285141&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23294515.2015.1127295

DO - 10.1080/23294515.2015.1127295

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 8

JO - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

JF - AJOB Empirical Bioethics

SN - 2329-4515

ER -