Variability in physician bioethical decision-making. A case study of euthanasia

R. A. Pearlman, Thomas Inui, W. B. Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A patient management problem was developed to assess differences in case information processing and variability in physicians' decisions to withhold supportive therapy. An interview was done to assess physicians' values and elicit reasons for their decisions. Two hundred and five residents, attending physicians, and community practitioners in internal medicine and family medicine were interviewed. Internal medicine residents were most inclined to allow the patient to die, private practitioners to provide respirator support. Residents and attending physicians gave higher value to, and sought significantly more, socioeconomic information about the patient than did private practitioners, and also estimated a shorter life expectancy for the patient. 'End-stage disease' and 'poor quality of life' were common explanations for withholding respirator support. Physicians decisions to intubate were attributed to the perceived 'acute reversible' nature of the medical problem.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)420-425
Number of pages6
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume97
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1982
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Euthanasia
Decision Making
Physicians
Mechanical Ventilators
Internal Medicine
Life Expectancy
Automatic Data Processing
Quality of Life
Medicine
Interviews

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Variability in physician bioethical decision-making. A case study of euthanasia. / Pearlman, R. A.; Inui, Thomas; Carter, W. B.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 97, No. 3, 1982, p. 420-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{41fb0be1c2464be2bda6139dd3eefc0e,
title = "Variability in physician bioethical decision-making. A case study of euthanasia",
abstract = "A patient management problem was developed to assess differences in case information processing and variability in physicians' decisions to withhold supportive therapy. An interview was done to assess physicians' values and elicit reasons for their decisions. Two hundred and five residents, attending physicians, and community practitioners in internal medicine and family medicine were interviewed. Internal medicine residents were most inclined to allow the patient to die, private practitioners to provide respirator support. Residents and attending physicians gave higher value to, and sought significantly more, socioeconomic information about the patient than did private practitioners, and also estimated a shorter life expectancy for the patient. 'End-stage disease' and 'poor quality of life' were common explanations for withholding respirator support. Physicians decisions to intubate were attributed to the perceived 'acute reversible' nature of the medical problem.",
author = "Pearlman, {R. A.} and Thomas Inui and Carter, {W. B.}",
year = "1982",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "420--425",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability in physician bioethical decision-making. A case study of euthanasia

AU - Pearlman, R. A.

AU - Inui, Thomas

AU - Carter, W. B.

PY - 1982

Y1 - 1982

N2 - A patient management problem was developed to assess differences in case information processing and variability in physicians' decisions to withhold supportive therapy. An interview was done to assess physicians' values and elicit reasons for their decisions. Two hundred and five residents, attending physicians, and community practitioners in internal medicine and family medicine were interviewed. Internal medicine residents were most inclined to allow the patient to die, private practitioners to provide respirator support. Residents and attending physicians gave higher value to, and sought significantly more, socioeconomic information about the patient than did private practitioners, and also estimated a shorter life expectancy for the patient. 'End-stage disease' and 'poor quality of life' were common explanations for withholding respirator support. Physicians decisions to intubate were attributed to the perceived 'acute reversible' nature of the medical problem.

AB - A patient management problem was developed to assess differences in case information processing and variability in physicians' decisions to withhold supportive therapy. An interview was done to assess physicians' values and elicit reasons for their decisions. Two hundred and five residents, attending physicians, and community practitioners in internal medicine and family medicine were interviewed. Internal medicine residents were most inclined to allow the patient to die, private practitioners to provide respirator support. Residents and attending physicians gave higher value to, and sought significantly more, socioeconomic information about the patient than did private practitioners, and also estimated a shorter life expectancy for the patient. 'End-stage disease' and 'poor quality of life' were common explanations for withholding respirator support. Physicians decisions to intubate were attributed to the perceived 'acute reversible' nature of the medical problem.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019944072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019944072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 97

SP - 420

EP - 425

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 3

ER -