Variability of electrocardiographic precordial lead placement

A method to improve accuracy and reliability

M. V. Herman, David Ingram, J. A. Levy, J. R. Cook, R. J. Athans

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Variability in precordial lead placement is a recognized source of electrocardiographic inaccuracy and lack of reproducibility. In an attempt to reduce error, we evaluated a new device to facilitate and guide precordial lead placement. This study involved three phases: (1) comparison of device-guided electrocardiogram with ECGs obtained by deliberate misplacement of precordial leads on the same patient; (2) electrocardiograms obtained by using the precordial lead device versus those obtained by standard technician methods; (3) reproducibility of precordial electrocardiographic leads between two technicians using the device to guide lead placement. Deliberate misplacement of precordial leads by 2 cm resulted in significant electrocardiographic interpretation changes in all patients. Comparing electrocardiograms obtained after device-guided precordial placement with those obtained after technician placement resulted in variations in 60% of patients including changes in R-wave amplitude, ST segments, Q waves, and transition zone. Significant Q-wave appearance/disappearance and/or significant ST-segment elevation/depression occurred in 19% of patients in Phase II. Sixteen percent of electrocardiograms showed significant changes when analyzed by an experienced electrocardiographer and 10% when interpreted by computer. Variable lead placements and resulting electrocardiographic alterations were not seen by either of two technicians when the device was used. This study confirms the widespread variability in precordial electrocardiograms secondary to lead misplacement. The use of a device to assist in the placement of precordial leads ensures accuracy and reproducibility of electrocardiography. Improved precision and quality control in this laboratory test have important implications in health care and its costs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-476
Number of pages8
JournalClinical Cardiology
Volume14
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electrocardiography
Equipment and Supplies
Lead
Quality Control
Health Care Costs

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • electrocardiogram
  • lead placement device
  • precordial lead placement
  • quality control
  • reproducibility
  • standardization
  • variability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Variability of electrocardiographic precordial lead placement : A method to improve accuracy and reliability. / Herman, M. V.; Ingram, David; Levy, J. A.; Cook, J. R.; Athans, R. J.

In: Clinical Cardiology, Vol. 14, No. 6, 1991, p. 469-476.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Herman, M. V. ; Ingram, David ; Levy, J. A. ; Cook, J. R. ; Athans, R. J. / Variability of electrocardiographic precordial lead placement : A method to improve accuracy and reliability. In: Clinical Cardiology. 1991 ; Vol. 14, No. 6. pp. 469-476.
@article{7247120473ae47d4885bc02b48eac5a3,
title = "Variability of electrocardiographic precordial lead placement: A method to improve accuracy and reliability",
abstract = "Variability in precordial lead placement is a recognized source of electrocardiographic inaccuracy and lack of reproducibility. In an attempt to reduce error, we evaluated a new device to facilitate and guide precordial lead placement. This study involved three phases: (1) comparison of device-guided electrocardiogram with ECGs obtained by deliberate misplacement of precordial leads on the same patient; (2) electrocardiograms obtained by using the precordial lead device versus those obtained by standard technician methods; (3) reproducibility of precordial electrocardiographic leads between two technicians using the device to guide lead placement. Deliberate misplacement of precordial leads by 2 cm resulted in significant electrocardiographic interpretation changes in all patients. Comparing electrocardiograms obtained after device-guided precordial placement with those obtained after technician placement resulted in variations in 60{\%} of patients including changes in R-wave amplitude, ST segments, Q waves, and transition zone. Significant Q-wave appearance/disappearance and/or significant ST-segment elevation/depression occurred in 19{\%} of patients in Phase II. Sixteen percent of electrocardiograms showed significant changes when analyzed by an experienced electrocardiographer and 10{\%} when interpreted by computer. Variable lead placements and resulting electrocardiographic alterations were not seen by either of two technicians when the device was used. This study confirms the widespread variability in precordial electrocardiograms secondary to lead misplacement. The use of a device to assist in the placement of precordial leads ensures accuracy and reproducibility of electrocardiography. Improved precision and quality control in this laboratory test have important implications in health care and its costs.",
keywords = "accuracy, electrocardiogram, lead placement device, precordial lead placement, quality control, reproducibility, standardization, variability",
author = "Herman, {M. V.} and David Ingram and Levy, {J. A.} and Cook, {J. R.} and Athans, {R. J.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "469--476",
journal = "Clinical Cardiology",
issn = "0160-9289",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variability of electrocardiographic precordial lead placement

T2 - A method to improve accuracy and reliability

AU - Herman, M. V.

AU - Ingram, David

AU - Levy, J. A.

AU - Cook, J. R.

AU - Athans, R. J.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Variability in precordial lead placement is a recognized source of electrocardiographic inaccuracy and lack of reproducibility. In an attempt to reduce error, we evaluated a new device to facilitate and guide precordial lead placement. This study involved three phases: (1) comparison of device-guided electrocardiogram with ECGs obtained by deliberate misplacement of precordial leads on the same patient; (2) electrocardiograms obtained by using the precordial lead device versus those obtained by standard technician methods; (3) reproducibility of precordial electrocardiographic leads between two technicians using the device to guide lead placement. Deliberate misplacement of precordial leads by 2 cm resulted in significant electrocardiographic interpretation changes in all patients. Comparing electrocardiograms obtained after device-guided precordial placement with those obtained after technician placement resulted in variations in 60% of patients including changes in R-wave amplitude, ST segments, Q waves, and transition zone. Significant Q-wave appearance/disappearance and/or significant ST-segment elevation/depression occurred in 19% of patients in Phase II. Sixteen percent of electrocardiograms showed significant changes when analyzed by an experienced electrocardiographer and 10% when interpreted by computer. Variable lead placements and resulting electrocardiographic alterations were not seen by either of two technicians when the device was used. This study confirms the widespread variability in precordial electrocardiograms secondary to lead misplacement. The use of a device to assist in the placement of precordial leads ensures accuracy and reproducibility of electrocardiography. Improved precision and quality control in this laboratory test have important implications in health care and its costs.

AB - Variability in precordial lead placement is a recognized source of electrocardiographic inaccuracy and lack of reproducibility. In an attempt to reduce error, we evaluated a new device to facilitate and guide precordial lead placement. This study involved three phases: (1) comparison of device-guided electrocardiogram with ECGs obtained by deliberate misplacement of precordial leads on the same patient; (2) electrocardiograms obtained by using the precordial lead device versus those obtained by standard technician methods; (3) reproducibility of precordial electrocardiographic leads between two technicians using the device to guide lead placement. Deliberate misplacement of precordial leads by 2 cm resulted in significant electrocardiographic interpretation changes in all patients. Comparing electrocardiograms obtained after device-guided precordial placement with those obtained after technician placement resulted in variations in 60% of patients including changes in R-wave amplitude, ST segments, Q waves, and transition zone. Significant Q-wave appearance/disappearance and/or significant ST-segment elevation/depression occurred in 19% of patients in Phase II. Sixteen percent of electrocardiograms showed significant changes when analyzed by an experienced electrocardiographer and 10% when interpreted by computer. Variable lead placements and resulting electrocardiographic alterations were not seen by either of two technicians when the device was used. This study confirms the widespread variability in precordial electrocardiograms secondary to lead misplacement. The use of a device to assist in the placement of precordial leads ensures accuracy and reproducibility of electrocardiography. Improved precision and quality control in this laboratory test have important implications in health care and its costs.

KW - accuracy

KW - electrocardiogram

KW - lead placement device

KW - precordial lead placement

KW - quality control

KW - reproducibility

KW - standardization

KW - variability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025858633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025858633&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 469

EP - 476

JO - Clinical Cardiology

JF - Clinical Cardiology

SN - 0160-9289

IS - 6

ER -