Vascular surgery-associated ureteral injury: Zebras do exist

Michael Dalsing, Richard Bihrle, Stephen G. Lalka, Dolores F. Cikrit, Alan Sawchuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This report describes a case of direct ureteral injury sustained during retroperitoneal vascular surgery. The diagnosis was delayed and treatment was complicated by infection. To address the patient's problem initially and then to consolidate our impressions, a literature review was undertaken. The conclusions from this review suggest that direct ureteral injury during vascular surgery is rare but most common during redo surgery, is just as likely to be missed as discovered during surgery, and when missed may be so for months. The diagnostic delay is caused by a varied and often misleading presentation, and a ureteral contrast study is the ultimate diagnostic tool. In these delayed cases the typical ureteral treatment is a stented ureteroureterostomy or nephrectomy. In the present case the patient was otherwise healthy; therefore an aggressive attitude to renal salvage was taken. This is a unique case of ileal conduit replacement of the damaged ureter for this specific situation. Five years after repair, renal function is stable without infectious complications. The current literature would suggest that the vascular graft may be left undisturbed if the urine is sterile. If infection is present, graft removal appears the standard of care and was successful in the present case.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-186
Number of pages7
JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1993

Fingerprint

Equidae
Blood Vessels
Wounds and Injuries
Transplants
Kidney
Urinary Diversion
Vascular System Injuries
Delayed Diagnosis
Standard of Care
Ureter
Infection
Nephrectomy
Urine
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Vascular surgery-associated ureteral injury : Zebras do exist. / Dalsing, Michael; Bihrle, Richard; Lalka, Stephen G.; Cikrit, Dolores F.; Sawchuk, Alan.

In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 7, No. 2, 03.1993, p. 180-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f24eaff7fd3342f08963b5ef8a769817,
title = "Vascular surgery-associated ureteral injury: Zebras do exist",
abstract = "This report describes a case of direct ureteral injury sustained during retroperitoneal vascular surgery. The diagnosis was delayed and treatment was complicated by infection. To address the patient's problem initially and then to consolidate our impressions, a literature review was undertaken. The conclusions from this review suggest that direct ureteral injury during vascular surgery is rare but most common during redo surgery, is just as likely to be missed as discovered during surgery, and when missed may be so for months. The diagnostic delay is caused by a varied and often misleading presentation, and a ureteral contrast study is the ultimate diagnostic tool. In these delayed cases the typical ureteral treatment is a stented ureteroureterostomy or nephrectomy. In the present case the patient was otherwise healthy; therefore an aggressive attitude to renal salvage was taken. This is a unique case of ileal conduit replacement of the damaged ureter for this specific situation. Five years after repair, renal function is stable without infectious complications. The current literature would suggest that the vascular graft may be left undisturbed if the urine is sterile. If infection is present, graft removal appears the standard of care and was successful in the present case.",
author = "Michael Dalsing and Richard Bihrle and Lalka, {Stephen G.} and Cikrit, {Dolores F.} and Alan Sawchuk",
year = "1993",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/BF02001013",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "180--186",
journal = "Annals of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0890-5096",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Vascular surgery-associated ureteral injury

T2 - Zebras do exist

AU - Dalsing, Michael

AU - Bihrle, Richard

AU - Lalka, Stephen G.

AU - Cikrit, Dolores F.

AU - Sawchuk, Alan

PY - 1993/3

Y1 - 1993/3

N2 - This report describes a case of direct ureteral injury sustained during retroperitoneal vascular surgery. The diagnosis was delayed and treatment was complicated by infection. To address the patient's problem initially and then to consolidate our impressions, a literature review was undertaken. The conclusions from this review suggest that direct ureteral injury during vascular surgery is rare but most common during redo surgery, is just as likely to be missed as discovered during surgery, and when missed may be so for months. The diagnostic delay is caused by a varied and often misleading presentation, and a ureteral contrast study is the ultimate diagnostic tool. In these delayed cases the typical ureteral treatment is a stented ureteroureterostomy or nephrectomy. In the present case the patient was otherwise healthy; therefore an aggressive attitude to renal salvage was taken. This is a unique case of ileal conduit replacement of the damaged ureter for this specific situation. Five years after repair, renal function is stable without infectious complications. The current literature would suggest that the vascular graft may be left undisturbed if the urine is sterile. If infection is present, graft removal appears the standard of care and was successful in the present case.

AB - This report describes a case of direct ureteral injury sustained during retroperitoneal vascular surgery. The diagnosis was delayed and treatment was complicated by infection. To address the patient's problem initially and then to consolidate our impressions, a literature review was undertaken. The conclusions from this review suggest that direct ureteral injury during vascular surgery is rare but most common during redo surgery, is just as likely to be missed as discovered during surgery, and when missed may be so for months. The diagnostic delay is caused by a varied and often misleading presentation, and a ureteral contrast study is the ultimate diagnostic tool. In these delayed cases the typical ureteral treatment is a stented ureteroureterostomy or nephrectomy. In the present case the patient was otherwise healthy; therefore an aggressive attitude to renal salvage was taken. This is a unique case of ileal conduit replacement of the damaged ureter for this specific situation. Five years after repair, renal function is stable without infectious complications. The current literature would suggest that the vascular graft may be left undisturbed if the urine is sterile. If infection is present, graft removal appears the standard of care and was successful in the present case.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027276504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027276504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF02001013

DO - 10.1007/BF02001013

M3 - Article

C2 - 8518136

AN - SCOPUS:0027276504

VL - 7

SP - 180

EP - 186

JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery

JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0890-5096

IS - 2

ER -